"GOSPEL PREACHING IN THE FIRST CENTURY" Philip In The Gaza Desert INTRODUCTION 1. From Peter’s first two sermons, we saw that gospel preaching in the first century involved... a. Proclaiming the death, burial, resurrection and lordship of Jesus Christ b. Extolling the character of Jesus, and that He will one day return c. Calling on people to respond with faith, repentance, and baptism d. Offering the remission of sins, and the refreshing gift of the Spirit 2. From Philip’s preaching in the city of Samaria, we saw that it included... a. Proclaiming the kingdom of God and the name (character) of Jesus Christ b. Calling on people to believe on Him and to be baptized in His name (by His authority) [As we continuing our survey of gospel preaching in the first century, we have another example of Philip preaching the gospel, this time to a single individual in the Gaza desert...] I. THE SETTING A. PHILIP SENT TOWARD GAZA... 1. An angel of the Lord tells Philip to go toward Gaza - Ac 8:26 2. On the way there is a man sitting in his chariot - Ac 8:27-28 a. A eunuch of Ethiopia, in charge of the treasury of Queen Candace b. Returning home, having gone to worship in Jerusalem, reading the prophet Isaiah 3. The Spirit tells Philip to overtake the chariot - Ac 8:29 B. PHILIP PREACHES JESUS... 1. Hearing the eunuch reading Isaiah, Philip asks if he understands - Ac 8:30 2. The eunuch asks Philip to help him - Ac 8:31-34 a. He expresses the need for someone to guide him, and invites Philip to sit with him b. The scripture under consideration is Isa 53:7-8 1) Which speaks of one led as a sheep to the slaughter 2) Which describes one whose life is taken from the earth c. The eunuch asks if Isaiah was speaking of himself, or of someone else 3. Beginning with that Scripture, Philip preaches Jesus to him - Ac 8:35 [As before, with Philip in the city of Samaria, we are not give the details of the actual sermon. But from what is revealed we can infer much about what Philip preached...] II. THE SERMON A. FROM ISAIAH’S QUOTATION... 1. Jesus died for our sins a. Isaiah reveals the reason for the Messiah’s suffering - Isa 53:4-6,10-11 b. Preaching Jesus therefore proclaims His death for our sins 2. Jesus has been exalted a. Isaiah’s prophecy begins and ends with the exaltation of the Messiah - Isa 52:13; 53:12 b. The theme of Jesus’ exaltation permeated Peter’s preaching - cf. Ac 2:36; 5:30-31 c. Preaching Jesus therefore pronounces that He has been exalted by God B. FROM THE EUNUCH’S QUESTION... 1. The importance of baptism a. Notice the question asked by the eunuch - Ac 8:36 b. "See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?" c. Preaching Jesus clearly included preaching on baptism! 2. The immediacy of baptism a. The Ethiopian was anxious to obey; Philip was willing to accommodate him - Ac 8:38 1) Why the urgency? Why not wait until they got to town, or to a church? 2) Others were baptized immediately, even after midnight - e.g., Ac 16:30-33 b. The reason for such urgency is clearly taught elsewhere 1) Baptism is for the remission of sins - cf. Ac 2:38; 22:16 2) We experience the working of God, and put on Christ - cf. Col 2:12-13; Ga 3:27 C. FROM PHILIP’S QUALIFICATION... 1. The necessity of faith a. Philip’s response to the eunuch’s question qualified who should be baptized - Ac 8:37 1) "If you believe...you may" 2) Faith is a necessary prerequisite to baptism, which precludes infant baptism b. Indeed faith is necessary to salvation - cf. Jn 8:24 1) Through faith we can have life in His name - cf. Jn 20:30-31 2) Baptism is a working of God when our faith is present - Col 2:12 2. The necessity of heartiness a. Philip required a wholehearted faith - Ac 8:37 1) "If you believe with all your heart, you may" 2) Baptism without such faith renders one simply wet! b. The sort of hearty sincerity God has always required 1) By the children of Israel under the Law - Mt 22:37 2) By the partakers of Christ today - He 3:12-14 D. THE RESPONSE... 1. The eunuch is baptized immediately - Ac 8:38 2. The eunuch goes on his way rejoicing - Ac 8:39 CONCLUSION 1. From Philip’s preaching in the Gaza desert, preaching Jesus in the first century included... a. Preaching about the suffering and exaltation of Christ b. Preaching the necessity and immediacy of baptism by a sincere believer 2. Today, many do not preach Jesus as did Philip (and Peter)... a. They ignore baptism altogether, or render it insignificant b. They call upon people to pray, when apostolic preaching commanded people to be baptized Has Jesus truly been preached to you, as Philip preached to both the Samaritans and the Eunuch...?Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011
8/8/14
From Mark Copeland... Philip In The Gaza Desert- Acts, Chapter 8
From Mark Copeland... Philip In The City Of Samaria Acts, Chapter 8
"GOSPEL PREACHING IN THE FIRST CENTURY" Philip In The City Of Samaria INTRODUCTION 1. From Peter’s first two sermons, we saw that gospel preaching in the first century involved... a. Proclaiming the death, burial, resurrection and lordship of Jesus Christ b. Extolling the character of Jesus, and that He will one day return 2. We also learn from Peter that gospel preaching in the first century... c. Called on people to respond with faith, repentance, and baptism d. Offered the remission of sins, and the refreshing gift of the Spirit 2. We now turn to the preaching of Philip, not an apostle but one who... a. Served as a "deacon", then as an evangelist - Ac 6:1-7; 8:5; 21:8 b. Was a man of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom - cf. Ac 6:3 [We have two accounts of Philip preaching the gospel of Christ, the first in the city of Samaria...] I. THE SETTING A. THE GOSPEL SPREADS FROM JERUSALEM... 1. Prompted by persecution spearheaded by Saul (Paul) - Ac 8:1-3 2. Those forced to leave Jerusalem take the gospel with them - Ac 8:4 B. THE GOSPEL ARRIVES IN SAMARIA... 1. The former capital and region of the northern kingdom of Israel - 1Ki 16:23-24 2. Populated by Samaritans, with whom Jews had little contact - 2Ki 17:24; Jn 4:9 3. Excluded by the Limited Commission, included in the Great Commission - Mt 10:5; 28:19 4. Jesus preached to them; His servant Philip now does the same - Jn 4:1-42; Ac 8:5 C. THE GOSPEL CONFIRMED WITH SIGNS... 1. People heeded Philip because of the signs he did - Ac 8:6-8 2. Simon, a sorcerer, was also impressed - Ac 8:9-11 3. Fulfilling the purpose of the signs and wonders - cf. Mk 16:19-20; He 2:3-4 [In such a setting, Philip preached Christ to them (Ac 8:5). While we don’t have an actual record of his sermon, we are given sufficient information to know what his preaching entailed...] II. THE SERMON A. THE KINGDOM OF GOD... 1. "he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God" - Ac 8:12 a. Proclaimed by John and Jesus in their ministries - Mt 3:1-2; Mk 1:14-15 b. Expounded upon by Jesus after His resurrection - Ac 1:3 c. Later a major theme in Paul’s preaching - Ac 19:8; 20:25; 28:23,31 2. What preaching the kingdom of God likely entailed a. The need to seek first the kingship and sovereignty of God - cf. Mt 6:33 b. Now being exercised through His Son, Jesus - cf. Mt 28:18; Ac 2:36; 5:31 c. In which they could now participate - cf. Col 1:13; Re 1:9 d. By responding to the call of the gospel - cf. 1Th 2:12; 2Th 2:14 e. Remaining faithful to Christ, even to death - cf. Re 2:10, 26-27; 3:21 B. THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST... 1. "he preached...the name of Jesus Christ" - Ac 8:12 a. "Jesus" means "savior", and He saves us from our sins - cf. Mt 1:21 b. "Christ" means "anointed", and He is the Anointed One of God - cf. Mt 3:16-17; 17:5 2. "Note that the term name connotes the full revelation of the Son of God and that the double name Jesus Christ reveals both his earthly ministry and his divine office." - Kistemaker a. "Jesus, therefore, is king in the kingdom of God." - ibid. b. As Peter proclaimed, Jesus is Lord, Christ, God’s Servant, The Holy One, the Just One, the Prince of life, the Prophet - Ac 2:36; 3:12-15,22-26 C. THE RESPONSE... 1. They "heeded the things spoken by Philip", implying obedience - Ac 8:6; cf. He 5:9 2. Men and women believed and were baptized - Ac 8:12 3. Even Simon the sorcerer believed and was baptized - Ac 8:13 4. Which we saw earlier was for the remission of sins - cf. Ac 2:38 CONCLUSION 1. From Philip’s ministry in the city of Samaria, we learn that gospel preaching involved... a. Proclaiming the kingdom of God and the name (character) of Jesus Christ b. Calling on people to believe on Him and to be baptized in His name (by His authority) 2. In Philip’s ministry to the Samaritans, we see that he obeyed the Great Commission... a. Going to other "nations" to preach the gospel - Mt 28:19; Mk 16:15 b. Making disciples by baptizing them to be saved - Mt 28:19; Mk 16:16 Given the opportunity to respond to the good news of Jesus Christ, the Samaritans’ heeded the gospel through faith and baptism, just like the Jews in Jerusalem. How about you? Are you willing to submit to the sovereignty of God now being exercised through His Son Jesus, by obeying the gospel of Christ? In our next study, we will examine Philip preaching the gospel in the Gaza desert...Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011
From Mark Copeland.... Peter At Solomon’s Porch- Acts, Chapter 3
"GOSPEL PREACHING IN THE FIRST CENTURY" Peter At Solomon’s Porch INTRODUCTION 1. From Peter’s first sermon we saw that gospel preaching in the first century involved... a. Proclaiming the death, burial, resurrection and lordship of Jesus Christ b. Calling on people to respond in faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins 2. Now we turn our attention to Peter’s second recorded sermon... a. Found in chapter three of the book of Acts b. In which Peter has the opportunity to preach at Solomon’s porch [As before, let’s first review the circumstances that led to the sermon itself...] I. THE SETTING A. PETER AND JOHN HAD GONE TO THE TEMPLE... 1. Christians had been gathering daily in the temple - Ac 2:46 2. Peter and John arrived at the "hour of prayer, the ninth hour" (3 p.m.) - Ac 3:1 B. MAN LAME FROM BIRTH HAD BEEN HEALED... 1. Who was left daily at the gate of the temple called "Beautiful" - Ac 3:2-3 a. To ask alms from the people entering the temple b. Who asked Peter and John for alms 2. Peter healed him in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth - Ac 3:4-8 a. The lame man expected alms b. But Peter offered him something much better than silver or gold! c. The miracle was immediate and total! C. CROWD HAD GATHERED... 1. Drawn by the scene of the man walking, praising God - Ac 3:9 2. Amazed and wondering, for they knew he had been lame from birth - Ac 3:10 3. They gathered in the porch called Solomon’s - Ac 3:11 a. A colonnaded area along the eastern wall of the temple area - ESVSB b. With double columns 38 feet tall, spanning 49 feet, supporting cedar ceilings - AYBD [The similarity to the events in Acts 2 is apparent: a miraculous event occurs, it attracts the attention of the people. As before, Peter uses the opportunity to preach the gospel...] II. THE SERMON A. JESUS PROCLAIMED AS MIRACLE EXPLAINED... 1. Not by the power or godliness of Peter and John themselves - Ac 3:12 2. It was through faith in God’s Servant, Jesus - Ac 3:13-16 a. Whom the God of their fathers had glorified! b. Whom they had delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate! c. Whom they denied, asking for a murderer to be released in his stead! d. Whom God raised from the dead, as seen by witnesses! e. Whom Peter describes as the "Holy One," the "Just", the "Prince of Life"! 3. Through faith in His name the lame man was healed - Ac 3:16 a. Peter and John’s faith in Jesus, not the lame man’s faith b. For the lame man had not expected a miracle, but silver or gold - cf. Ac 3:4-7 B. REPENTANCE COMMANDED AS IGNORANCE ACKNOWLEDGED... 1. Peter admits they and their rulers acted in ignorance - Ac 3:17 2. What occurred was foretold and fulfilled by God - Ac 3:18; cf. Ac 2:23 3. Yet ignorance is no excuse, so they must "repent and be converted" - Ac 3:19 a. Repent - change their minds their minds regarding Jesus and their sinful ways b. Convert - turn to God, which implies baptism - cf. Ac 2:38; 1Pe 3:21 4. Reasons to repent and turn to God are given - Ac 3:19-26 a. That your sins may be blotted out (remitted) - cf. Ac 2:38 b. That times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord (possibly referring to the gift of the Spirit)- cf. Ac 2:38; Jn 7:37-39; Ga 4:6; 5:22-23 c. That God may send Jesus Christ (a reference to His second coming) 1) Who was preached to them before (via the prophets) 2) Whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things (of which the prophets of God had also spoken) d. They were sons of the prophets, and of the covenant God made with their fathers 1) A covenant made with Abraham, to bless the world in his seed 2) A promise fulfilled by God through His Servant Jesus, Whom He raised a) Who was sent by God to bless them b) To bless them by turning them away from their sins C. RESPONSE... 1. A negative response by the religious leaders - Ac 4:1-3 2. A positive response by many who heard (2000 believed) - Ac 4:4 CONCLUSION 1. Again we see that gospel preaching in the first century involved... a. Proclaiming the death, burial, resurrection and lordship of Jesus Christ b. Calling on people to respond with repentance (faith and baptism implied) c. Offering the remission of sins and refreshing gift of the Spirit 2. We also learn that it included proclaiming... a. The character of Jesus (Servant, Holy, Just, Prince of life, Christ, Prophet) b. The return of Jesus (i.e., His second coming) The power of the gospel to convict the hearts of men continues to be seen (5000 after two sermons). Though with some, the effect appears to be a hardening of their hearts. How have you responded to the gospel preaching? In faithful obedience, or have you been hardening your heart by refusing to obey in faith, repentance and baptism...?
Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011
From Mark Copeland... Peter On The Day Of Pentecost- Acts, Chapter 2
"GOSPEL PREACHING IN THE FIRST CENTURY" Peter On The Day Of Pentecost INTRODUCTION 1. Today we often hear people speak of "gospel preaching"... a. Where sometimes the gospel is not mentioned at all b. Or that preached is not the gospel preached by the apostles - cf. Ga 1:6-9 2. The gospel is "good news" which... a. Jesus wanted His apostles to preach to everyone - Mk 16:15 b. His apostles proclaimed after Jesus ascended to heaven - Mk 16:19-20 3. But is this same gospel being preached today? In the book of Acts... a. We have examples of gospel preaching in the first century b. Gospel preaching by the apostles and preachers of Jesus Christ 4. In this series, we shall consider examples of gospel preaching... a. Done by the apostles and preachers of Jesus Christ b. Examining the content of their sermons and response expected of the hearers [We begin with very first gospel sermon proclaimed by the apostle Peter...] I. THE SETTING A. THE DAY OF PENTECOST... 1. It was the day of Pentecost - Ac 2:1 2. One of three major Jewish feasts, also called the Feast of Weeks 3. Pentecost means "fifty", observed fifty days after the Passover 4. Jesus had ascended to heaven just ten days before - Ac 1:9-11 B. THE OUTPOURING OF THE SPIRIT... 1. The apostles had been waiting for the promise of the Spirit - Ac 1:4-5 2. Matthias had just been selected to replace Judas Iscariot - Ac 1:15-26 3. With audible and visual signs, the Spirit came upon the apostles - Ac 2:2-4 4. They spoke in foreign languages, understood by visitors from other countries - Ac 2:5-11 5. Some thought they were drunk, but it was too early in the morning - Ac 2:12-15 6. Peter explained that it was the fulfillment of Joel’s prophecy - Ac 2:16-21 [With the miraculous events explained, Peter now had the attention of the audience as he began the first gospel sermon ever preached...] II. THE SERMON A. JESUS ATTESTED BY GOD... 1. Peter proclaims Jesus as a Man attested by God through His miracles - Ac 2:22 2. Done in their midst, they could not deny the signs Jesus did while alive! B. JESUS PUT TO DEATH... 1. By crucifixion, which they themselves did with lawless (Roman) hands - Ac 2:23 2. Though it part of God’s predetermined purpose and foreknowledge - ibid. 3. Jesus’ death and their involvement they could not deny! C. JESUS RAISED FROM THE DEAD... 1. God raised Jesus, having loosed the pains of death - Ac 2:24 2. Peter offered three proofs that Jesus rose from the dead a. David’s prophecy, fulfilled in Jesus - Ac 2:25-31; cf. Ps 16:8-11 b. Eyewitness testimony, by the twelve apostles - Ac 2:32; cf. Ac 1:21-22 c. Outpouring of the Spirit, which the audience themselves saw and heard - Ac 2:33 3. Compelling evidence to those who were present! D. JESUS EXALTED AS LORD AND CHRIST... 1. The outpouring of the Spirit was the result of Jesus’ exaltation - Ac 2:33 2. Jesus’ exaltation was prophesied by David - Ac 2:34-35; cf. Ps 110:1 3. Thus the crucified Jesus was now Lord and Christ! - Ac 2:36 E. REACTION AND RESPONSE... 1. Cut to the heart, many asked "What shall we do?" - Ac 2:37 2. We note that the following was required: a. Believe in Jesus ("know assuredly") as Lord and Christ - Ac 2:36 b. Repent of sins - Ac 2:38 c. Baptism for remission of sins and gift of the Holy Spirit - Ac 2:38-39 3. The follow-up: a. Peter exhorted them "Be saved from this perverse generation" - Ac 2:40 b. 3000 gladly received his word and were baptized - Ac 2:41 c. Those baptized were "added" by the Lord to His church - Ac 2:41,47 d. Thus began the Lord’s church in Jerusalem - Ac 2:42-47 CONCLUSION 1. From Peter’s sermon we learn that gospel preaching in the first century involved... a. Proclaiming the death, burial, resurrection and lordship of Jesus Christ b. Calling on people to respond in faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of sins 2. If you had been there on that occasion, how would you have responded...? a. Like the 3000, would you have gladly been baptized? - Ac 2:41 b. Would you have continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine, etc.? - Ac 2:42 Or like many today have you yet to accept that gospel message preached in the first century? If so, may I like Peter plead with you: "Be saved from this perverse generation." Respond to the same gospel Peter preached, in the same way 3000 did on that occasion, by believing in Christ, repenting of your sins, and being baptized for the remission of sins. As Jesus said: "He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will condemned." - Mk 16:16Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011
From Gary... The answer to the question "behind the question"
I deliberately removed the color from this picture in order to emphasize the question posed to this contestant. Frankly, this is a stupid, insensitive and possibly racially offensive choice. I really understand WHY his eyes are so wide open, because I enjoy all the choices and would be VERY HARD PRESSED TO MAKE A CHOICE HERE MYSELF!!! Intellectually, I KNOW this is a game show (I wish I could remember which one) and its supposed to attract your attention- but sometimes, producers just go too far!!! Questions people ask say a lot about those doing the asking and the following two episodes (which are actually one encounter) makes you wonder about people.
Mark 12:12-17 NASB(12) And they were seeking to seize Him, and yet they feared the people, for they understood that He spoke the parable against them. And so they left Him and went away.
(13) Then they *sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to Him in order to trap Him in a statement.
(14) They *came and *said to Him, "Teacher, we know that You are truthful and defer to no one; for You are not partial to any, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay a poll-tax to Caesar, or not?
(15) "Shall we pay or shall we not pay?" But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, "Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to look at."
(16) They brought one. And He *said to them, "Whose likeness and inscription is this?" And they said to Him, "Caesar's."
(17) And Jesus said to them, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." And they were amazed at Him.
(13) Then they *sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to Him in order to trap Him in a statement.
(14) They *came and *said to Him, "Teacher, we know that You are truthful and defer to no one; for You are not partial to any, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay a poll-tax to Caesar, or not?
(15) "Shall we pay or shall we not pay?" But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, "Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to look at."
(16) They brought one. And He *said to them, "Whose likeness and inscription is this?" And they said to Him, "Caesar's."
(17) And Jesus said to them, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." And they were amazed at Him.
Mark 12:18-27 NASB
(18) Some Sadducees (who say that there is no resurrection) *came to Jesus, and began questioning Him, saying,
(19) "Teacher, Moses wrote for us that IF A MAN'S BROTHER DIES and leaves behind a wife AND LEAVES NO CHILD, HIS BROTHER SHOULD MARRY THE WIFE AND RAISE UP CHILDREN TO HIS BROTHER.
(20) "There were seven brothers; and the first took a wife, and died leaving no children.
(21) "The second one married her, and died leaving behind no children; and the third likewise;
(22) and so all seven left no children. Last of all the woman died also.
(23) "In the resurrection, when they rise again, which one's wife will she be? For all seven had married her."
(24) Jesus said to them, "Is this not the reason you are mistaken, that you do not understand the Scriptures or the power of God?
(25) "For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
(26) "But regarding the fact that the dead rise again, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the burning bush, how God spoke to him, saying, 'I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, and the God of Jacob'?
(27) "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; you are greatly mistaken."
(18) Some Sadducees (who say that there is no resurrection) *came to Jesus, and began questioning Him, saying,
(19) "Teacher, Moses wrote for us that IF A MAN'S BROTHER DIES and leaves behind a wife AND LEAVES NO CHILD, HIS BROTHER SHOULD MARRY THE WIFE AND RAISE UP CHILDREN TO HIS BROTHER.
(20) "There were seven brothers; and the first took a wife, and died leaving no children.
(21) "The second one married her, and died leaving behind no children; and the third likewise;
(22) and so all seven left no children. Last of all the woman died also.
(23) "In the resurrection, when they rise again, which one's wife will she be? For all seven had married her."
(24) Jesus said to them, "Is this not the reason you are mistaken, that you do not understand the Scriptures or the power of God?
(25) "For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
(26) "But regarding the fact that the dead rise again, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the burning bush, how God spoke to him, saying, 'I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, and the God of Jacob'?
(27) "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; you are greatly mistaken."
For a Jew, these would be very difficult questions and Jesus revealed both his spiritual insight and wisdom in those famous answers of his. But, why did those questions ever get asked in the first place? Well, the first group (Pharisees and Herodians) is easy- Verse 13 says they wanted to trap Jesus. But, what about the Sadducees? Seems to me that their pride was involved; for after all- THEY (THE SADDUCEES) were comprised of the ruling class and if anyone were going to GET JESUS, certainly it should be the very best Jews (WE RULE HERE; AFTER ALL!!!). The next time someone asks you a difficult question; do what Jesus obviously did: Answer the question, but also address the reason why the question was asked in the first place!!! If these things don't make you wonder about WHO JESUS REALLY WAS, nothing will!!!
PS. After some thought, I would pick Kool-Aid because I am just not as fond of sweet things as I was as a child!!!
8/7/14
From Jim McGuiggan... Jesus Christ and Creation
Jesus Christ and Creation
John and others have taught us that God must be
understood through Jesus Christ—if you've seen and known me you see and
know the Father, Jesus taught us (John 14); and if we've come to know
Jesus we've come to know the Holy Spirit who is the Spirit of God's Son
as well as the Spirit of God (Galatians 4:6).
When we think of knowing God by looking at Jesus I would suppose that we automatically think of God's character and the kind of heart he has; no bad thing that. But I think we need we should spare a thought for God's purposes.
His purposes reflect his character too, don't you know, but Jesus came
to accomplish things in his Father's name and as his Father's servant
and when we see Jesus we see the one in whom the purposes of God are
focused.
Colossians 1:15-17 makes us think of Genesis 1:26-28.
The echo of the "image of God" and then the notion of dominion and power
in which Jesus is said to be preeminent and the one in whom all things
hold together. Colossians 1 echoes Genesis 1 but it takes us light years
beyond it. Three distinct prepositions tell us how and why the creation
came to be. It came to be "through" him as the agent of creation (1
Corinthians 8:6). As surely as election and redemption is "in" Jesus so
also was the world created "in" him (see Ephesians 1:4). He is the
conceptual sphere within which God worked to create; creation was
created in light of Jesus, with Jesus as its driving thought and
inspiration. And the creation was created for (or "unto") him—he was
creation's goal. In the glorious and immortal Jesus, the Son of God and
the last Adam the creation found its completion. What went before was
real and wonderful but it was all moving toward him. This God purposed
in creation before the human family rebelled and our rebellion did not
change his mind. The redeeming life and person of Jesus Christ completes
the two tasks—he sets the world right in redemption and brings it to
its purposed climax with him as its glorified Lord.
The Incarnation, redeeming life, death, resurrection and
exaltation confirm God's eternal creation purposes by bringing about
redemption and reconciliation. The creation is not destined for
destruction in "the great fire"—it was created for Jesus.
This has ramifications for how we look at, work with and relate to the creation.
©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.
Many thanks to Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, theabidingword.com.
humm... will have to think about this one... Gary
Many thanks to Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, theabidingword.com.
humm... will have to think about this one... Gary
Was Jonah Swallowed by a Fish or a Whale? by Eric Lyons, M.Min.
http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=11&article=2830
The book of Jonah reveals that “[t]he Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish
three days and three nights” (1:17, emp. added). About 800 years later,
Jesus alluded to this amazing event (Matthew 12:39-41). According to
the King James translation of Matthew 12:40, Jesus referred to Jonah
being “three days and three nights in the whale’s
belly” (emp. added). Since fish and whales are different creatures,
skeptics accuse Jesus and the Bible writers of making a mistake (cf.
Wells, 2012). Longtime Bible critic Dennis McKinsey alleged that Matthew
12:40 is “[p]robably the most famous scientific error by Jesus” (1995,
p. 142). “Apparently Jesus hadn’t read the Old Testament very closely…
Anyone with even a minimum of biological knowledge knows that a whale is
not a fish and a fish is not a whale” (pp. 142-143).
Such a criticism of Jesus and the Bible writers epitomizes the impotence of skeptics’ attacks on God and His Word. McKinsey bases his criticism solely on an English translation made nearly 1,600 years after Jesus spoke these words. The skeptic never bothered to compare translations. He never asked about the word that Jesus originally spoke or that Matthew recorded. He did nothing but make a cursory criticism that might sound sensible on the surface, yet with only a little investigation, is easily and rationally explained.
What was the underlying Greek word that is translated “whale” in the KJV (as well as a few other versions)? A brief look in various respected Greek dictionaries quickly reveals that the word is ketos and is defined broadly as a “large sea creature” (Newman, 1971, p. 100), “sea monster” (Danker, et al., 2000, p. 544), or “huge fish” (Vine, 1952, p. 209). Jesus indicated that Jonah was swallowed by a “large sea creature,” which was not necessarily a whale, but may have been.
Nearly 300 years before Jesus spoke of Jonah being swallowed by a ketos (Matthew 12:40), translators of the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) used this same Greek word (ketos) to translate the Hebrew word (dahg, fish) found in Jonah 1:17, 2:1, and 2:10. The fact is, as Hebrew and Greek scholar Jack Lewis concluded, both dahg and ketos “designate sea creatures of undefined species” (1976, 2:178). In no way did Jesus, the Creator of all things (John 1:3), make a mistake about what kind of animal God “had prepared” to swallow Jonah. The animal was a great sea creature, and not necessarily a great “fish” according to our modern, more limited, definition of the word. It may very well have been a type of fish (e.g., shark), water-living mammal (e.g., whale), or extinct, dinosaur-like, water-living reptile. We simply cannot be sure. As Dave Miller concluded: “Both the Hebrew and Greek languages lacked the precision to identify with specificity the identity of the creature that swallowed Jonah” (2003).
Finally, one crucial truth that many (especially the Bible critics) miss in a discussion about God and the Bible writers’ naming and classifying of animals is that God did not classify animals thousands of years ago according to our modern classification system. As far back as Creation, God divided animals into very basic, natural groups. He made aquatic and aerial creatures on day five and terrestrial animals on day six (Genesis 1:20-23,24-25). Just as God sensibly classified bats with “birds,” since they both fly (Leviticus 11:13-19; see Lyons, 2009), He could classify whales as “fish,” since they both maneuver by swimming. To accuse Jesus or the Bible writers of incorrectly categorizing an animal based upon Carolus Linnaeus’ 18th-century classification of animals, or any other modern method of classifying animals, is both illogical and unjust.
[NOTE: For more information on the Hebrew and Greek words dahg and ketos, see Miller, 2003.]
Lewis, Jack P. (1976), The Gospel According to Matthew (Austin, TX: Sweet).
Lyons, Eric (2009), “Did the Bible Writers Commit Biological Blunders?” Reason & Revelation, 29[7]:49-55, July.
McKinsey, Dennis (1995), The Encylopedia of Biblical Errancy (Amherst, NY: Prometheus).
Miller, Dave (2003), “Jonah and the ‘Whale’?” Apologetics Press, http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=6&article=69.
Newman, Barclay M., Jr. (1971), A Concise Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament (London: United Bible Societies).
Vine, W.E. (1952), An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words (Old Tappan, NJ: Revell).
Wells, Steve (2012), Skeptic’s Annotated Bible, http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/whale.html.
Was Jonah Swallowed by a Fish or a Whale?
| by | Eric Lyons, M.Min. |
Such a criticism of Jesus and the Bible writers epitomizes the impotence of skeptics’ attacks on God and His Word. McKinsey bases his criticism solely on an English translation made nearly 1,600 years after Jesus spoke these words. The skeptic never bothered to compare translations. He never asked about the word that Jesus originally spoke or that Matthew recorded. He did nothing but make a cursory criticism that might sound sensible on the surface, yet with only a little investigation, is easily and rationally explained.
What was the underlying Greek word that is translated “whale” in the KJV (as well as a few other versions)? A brief look in various respected Greek dictionaries quickly reveals that the word is ketos and is defined broadly as a “large sea creature” (Newman, 1971, p. 100), “sea monster” (Danker, et al., 2000, p. 544), or “huge fish” (Vine, 1952, p. 209). Jesus indicated that Jonah was swallowed by a “large sea creature,” which was not necessarily a whale, but may have been.
Nearly 300 years before Jesus spoke of Jonah being swallowed by a ketos (Matthew 12:40), translators of the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) used this same Greek word (ketos) to translate the Hebrew word (dahg, fish) found in Jonah 1:17, 2:1, and 2:10. The fact is, as Hebrew and Greek scholar Jack Lewis concluded, both dahg and ketos “designate sea creatures of undefined species” (1976, 2:178). In no way did Jesus, the Creator of all things (John 1:3), make a mistake about what kind of animal God “had prepared” to swallow Jonah. The animal was a great sea creature, and not necessarily a great “fish” according to our modern, more limited, definition of the word. It may very well have been a type of fish (e.g., shark), water-living mammal (e.g., whale), or extinct, dinosaur-like, water-living reptile. We simply cannot be sure. As Dave Miller concluded: “Both the Hebrew and Greek languages lacked the precision to identify with specificity the identity of the creature that swallowed Jonah” (2003).
Finally, one crucial truth that many (especially the Bible critics) miss in a discussion about God and the Bible writers’ naming and classifying of animals is that God did not classify animals thousands of years ago according to our modern classification system. As far back as Creation, God divided animals into very basic, natural groups. He made aquatic and aerial creatures on day five and terrestrial animals on day six (Genesis 1:20-23,24-25). Just as God sensibly classified bats with “birds,” since they both fly (Leviticus 11:13-19; see Lyons, 2009), He could classify whales as “fish,” since they both maneuver by swimming. To accuse Jesus or the Bible writers of incorrectly categorizing an animal based upon Carolus Linnaeus’ 18th-century classification of animals, or any other modern method of classifying animals, is both illogical and unjust.
[NOTE: For more information on the Hebrew and Greek words dahg and ketos, see Miller, 2003.]
REFERENCES
Danker, Frederick William, William Arndt, and F.W. Gingrich, (2000), Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Lewis, Jack P. (1976), The Gospel According to Matthew (Austin, TX: Sweet).
Lyons, Eric (2009), “Did the Bible Writers Commit Biological Blunders?” Reason & Revelation, 29[7]:49-55, July.
McKinsey, Dennis (1995), The Encylopedia of Biblical Errancy (Amherst, NY: Prometheus).
Miller, Dave (2003), “Jonah and the ‘Whale’?” Apologetics Press, http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=6&article=69.
Newman, Barclay M., Jr. (1971), A Concise Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament (London: United Bible Societies).
Vine, W.E. (1952), An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words (Old Tappan, NJ: Revell).
Wells, Steve (2012), Skeptic’s Annotated Bible, http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/whale.html.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



