https://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=5463
"Jesus Gave Him No Answer"
"To
err is human," the poet rightly said, and apologists are humans. But as
apologists, it is also inevitable that the writers and speakers for
Apologetics Press will be unjustly criticized, viciously and publicly
attacked, brazenly misrepresented, unethically plagiarized, or even
outright lied about—and not infrequently. After all, Jesus predicted
that persecution will come to those who attempt to speak the truth (John
15:18-20). From time to time, individuals will witness examples of such
shocking behavior and ask us with incredulity, “Do you guys respond to
that kind of behavior? And if so, how!?” Answers range from, “The best
we can, though not always perfectly” to “sometimes better than at other
times” to “not always in the wisest ways, but always with the desire to
defend the faith and trying to speak the truth in love.” The real
question in our minds, however, is not “How do we respond?” but how does
God tell us to respond to that type of persecution?
Jude 3 tells us that we are to “contend earnestly for the faith,”1
but how? Jude 3 is a mandate, but it does not prescribe a manner.
Scripture certainly has a lot to say about the attitudes we should have
when we are publicly mistreated and the ways we should respond to
people, making it clear that different people and situations often call
for different approaches. While we should always speak
the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15), it is also true that sometimes love
demands different approaches. The New Testament tells us repeatedly that
agape love is fundamental to Christianity.2 Without
love, one simply cannot be a Christian (1 John 4:7-8). That single
motivation—to love—would govern every decision and action that a
Christian takes, if he would be perfect. After all, according to the New
Testament and Jesus, Himself, sin ultimately boils down to a lack of agape3—love towards God and our fellow man.
Gathering all of the relevant passages on agape, we learn that it can be defined in the following way:
Having such concern for the well-being of someone else that I am
willing to unselfishly act on that concern for that person’s well-being,
no matter who it is or the cost to me.4
Notice, then, that love is not a feeling, but a choice (1 John 3:18). If we were to summarize the definition of agape in one word, it would be unselfishness, and it is always manifested through some form of a selfless act.5
That attitude encapsulates Who God is (1 John 4:7-8), while the
opposite—being self-serving—is described as being demon-like (James
3:14-16). Truly, if we wish to be like God, we will unselfishly put
ourselves aside and do what’s best for others, even when they are
mistreating us.
Jesus faces Pilate.
|
That said, a common misconception about biblical love is that it can be
defined solely as being gentle, tolerant, and without judgment. If one
were to be anything else in his evangelism or defense of truth, he would
be unloving and guilty of sin—according to the common misconception. In
truth, biblical love is not always manifested gently,6 with tolerance,7 or without judgment.8
In truth, different approaches are appropriate at different times.
Sometimes rebuking—an approach we would not generally deem gentle—might
be necessary (Luke 17:3), while at other times admonishing/warning
(Romans 15:14), edifying/building up (Romans 14:19), or
exhorting/encouraging (Titus 1:9) are appropriate. Notice, however, that
in all cases, love is the motivation: a desire to do whatever is
necessary to help others be pleasing to God—whether through gentle
pleading (Galatians 6:1) or through “tough love” (Hebrews 12:5-11; Titus
1:13). Further, boldness is certainly encouraged for evangelists (Acts
4:29), but it is to be tempered with humility (2 Timothy 2:25), prudence
(Proverbs 22:3), and being slow to speak (James 1:19), as Peter learned
the hard way on more than one occasion.9 Knowing the best
response for each situation would require more wisdom than any single
human could have, which is why humbly gaining knowledge through
experience (Proverbs 16:31), study (Proverbs 10:14), and counsel
(Proverbs 11:14) is emphasized in Scripture.
Preparation for the day of persecution and challenges
to your beliefs is also emphasized in Scripture. Peter reminds us to
“always be ready to give a defense” (1 Peter 3:15), since there will be a
day when a person will ask us why we have hope in God, if we are living
as we should before them. So we should strive to “be ready, in season
and out of season” (2 Timothy 4:2) to use whatever tactic might be
appropriate in various situations—whether it be merely convincing them
of the truth, or rebuking, or exhorting another Christian. Such
readiness takes diligence—incessant study and preparation (2 Timothy
2:15; Acts 17:11).
That said, Who better to study to learn how to respond to public
persecutions and challenges than the Chief Apologist, Himself—Jesus
Christ? After all, it is He Whom the Christian must emulate. Reading
through the gospel accounts, watching how Jesus chose to respond to His
critics, is a fascinating practice. Jesus was never looking for a fight,
but was always prepared to contend for the Faith and defend Himself
when necessary, and chose to do so many times throughout His ministry.
Typically, He did so seemingly dispassionately—using pure logic and
reason.10 The word used to describe Him in 2 Corinthians 10:1
is “meek”—the word often used to describe, not a wild bull in a China
shop, but a trained war horse: strength and fearlessness that is bridled
or under control. Jesus recognized that He had ultimately nothing to
lose by teaching the truth and, therefore, did not get “riled” up and
respond defensively to skeptics and antagonists. That is not to say,
however, that He never showed passion when the circumstance called for
it; but He was always controlled in His responses, being fearless of the
possible consequences. Oh that we all could emulate our Lord in this
regard.
At times, we at Apologetics Press have been criticized for not
responding to every comment on our Facebook page or choosing not to
debate every person who wishes to engage us in a public debate (which
apparently some do not realize happens often and would require several
more full-time representatives than we have on staff). Of particular
interest to those of us that study apologetics is the observation that,
though Christ was always ready for a debate, He also knew when not
to do so—whether because the timing was not right for a response, a
response would be pointless (e.g., Matthew 21:27), or a response would
even be detrimental to His ultimate cause. Just because a person
challenged Him did not mean that He felt He needed to respond. Since the
human inclination is to respond to every person, lest we be perceived
as not having an answer and, hence, “losing the debate,” Jesus’ wisdom
is awe-inspiring. In Matthew 7:6, while preaching the greatest sermon
the world has ever heard, Jesus warned His audience that some people do
not care about the truth and are like “swine”—unworthy of the valuable
information we might wish to impart. If we choose to proceed and reason
with the “pigs,” they are likely not only to stamp on the valuable
jewels we have given them, but they will likely stampede us as well. In
Proverbs 26:4, Solomon admonished the wise, “Do not answer a fool
according to his folly, lest you also be like him.” The principle is
clear: if the person or people to whom we are talking are not genuinely
interested in the truth, to spend time trying to convince them of the
truth would be wasteful and potentially even dangerous or
counterproductive.
In Matthew 10, Jesus again warned His apostles that there will be those
who “will not receive you nor hear your words” (vs. 14). In such cases,
they were not to continue pressing the issue, but rather, “shake off
the dust from your feet” and move on—a practice which Paul and Barnabas
implemented in their evangelistic journeys as well (Acts 13:51). With
that principle in mind, it is noteworthy to see Jesus’ implementation of
that principle in His own life. At times, He chose to respond to
challenges, depending on the audience, but at other times, He chose not
to do so, in spite of how He might be perceived. For instance, when
challenged by the chief priests and elders in the Temple to announce who
gave Him authority to teach, after posing a question of His own, Jesus
chose simply not to respond to their question (Matthew 21:23-27).
Surely the most notable example of Jesus practicing what He preached
about remaining silent at times was what was prophesied about Him in
Isaiah 53:7 regarding His crucifixion: “He was oppressed and He was
afflicted, yet He opened not His mouth; He was led as a
lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so
He opened not His mouth.” All four gospel records highlight Jesus’
refusal to respond to various attackers in the illegal trials leading up
to His crucifixion.11 Again, His willingness to remain
silent when most would respond defensively was a manifestation of such
superhuman self-control that Pilate “marveled greatly” (Matthew 27:14).
The principle is clear: there are times when not responding to attacks
is the best course of action. We would do well to gain the wisdom
necessary to recognize those moments. We pray that God will grant to all
Christians in the perilous times in which we live the wisdom to know
when to fight and when to remain silent, as well as the boldness to
fight when the time calls for it.
Endnotes
1 In 2 Timothy 2:24 the text says that “a servant of the Lord must not quarrel,” which commentators clarify as meaning not “striving contentiously” [Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary
(2012), WORDsearch Corp, Electronic Database.]. The ESV, therefore,
translates the word “quarrel” as “quarrelsome” (i.e., looking for a
fight). One can “contend” without being “contentious.”
2 James 2:8; 1 John 3:13-18; 4:7; John 13:34-35; 1 Corinthians 13:1-3; 16:14; Colossians 3:14.
3 Matthew 22:36-40; Galatians 5:14; Romans 13:9-10.
4 Galatians 5:23; Romans 5:8; 1 John 4:10; John 3:16; John 15:13; Matthew 5:43-48; cf. Endnotes 2 and 3.
5 Matthew 7:12; 16:24; Philippians 1:15-17; 2:3-8; 1 Corinthians 10:24; 2 Corinthians 5:15.
6 Hebrews 12:6; Titus 1:13; Proverbs 15:10; 20:30; 27:5;
Hosea 6:5. Consider Jesus’ behavior in John 2—overturning tables and
making a whip of cords to drive the moneychangers and animals from the
Temple. Consider also that sometimes loving a child involves physically
striking him (Proverbs 13:24). Note that the term translated “gentle” in
2 Timothy 2:24 (apiov) means to be “kind toward someone”—a
significant distinction in this case [William Arndt, F.W. Gingrich, and
Frederick W. Danker (1979), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press), second edition revised, p. 348]. The
ESV, NIV, RSV, and NASB renderings capture this meaning. One can be kind
to someone and simultaneously not necessarily be gentle, as the above
passages indicate.
7 2 Thessalonians 3:6,14; Titus 3:10; Romans 16:17; 1 Timothy 5:20.
8 John 7:24; 2 Corinthians 5:10.
9 John 13:5-9; Matthew 16:22-23; 17:1-5.
10 Dave Miller (2011), “Jesus Used Logic,” Apologetics Press, http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=11& article=3755; Dave Miller (2011), “Is Christianity Logical? [Part I],” Reason & Revelation, 31[6]:50-59, http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx? category=12&article=3869; Dave Miller (2011), “Jesus Was Logical,” Apologetics Press, https://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=10&article=653&topic=71; Dave Miller (2011), “Jesus Was Rational,” Apologetics Press, http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=10&article=1245&topic=71.
11 E.g., Matthew 26:62-63; 27:13-14; Mark 14:60-61; 15:4-5; Luke 23:9; John 19:9.