9/10/13

From Jim McGuiggan... Matthew 15:21-28: Not only a God of the hills

Matthew 15:21-28: Not only a God of the hills

In ancient times the nations thought their gods were limited to certain areas. Israel defeated Syria repeatedly in battle and the Syrians construed that Israel’s God was “a god of the hills.” So they thought if they could pitch the future battles on flat ground that they’d have more success against Israel. See 1 Kings 20:23-28. Naaman a famous general thought Israel’s God must be worshiped on Israel’s land so he carried some soil back to his home from Israel to build an altar to worship him. See 2 Kings 5:17-18. This view of limited divine power established itself in Israel also so they made alliances with other nations and worshiped their gods on models of their altars—Yahweh was limited, don’t you see. See Exodus 32:1-4 and 1 Kings 16:10-16. 
It wasn’t clear to all that there was only one true God and that his power extended over all. It wasn’t clear that there was only one world spirit that expressed itself in various shapes and forms throughout the entire earth and that if God reigned over it anywhere he reigned over it everywhere. 
When the reign of God finally and fully manifested itself on earth in the Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth, God made havoc of satanic structures and accomplishments. His reign showed itself within the borders of Israel at first and then spread to the rest of the earth. In the young Messiah God entered into the long-remembered centre of licentious Baal worship, Tyre and Sidon (Matthew 15:21-28) and cast out the spirit of the unclean and oppression and pain. The “strong man’s” goods were being spoiled by someone stronger and he was doing it not only in Israel—he was doing it anywhere the satanic power showed itself. 
This Lord of royal power was claiming every square foot of room in the entire universe and he was doing it in favour of the oppressed of all nations. He’s still doing it and we know he will make his own already complete victory the experience of all who are embraced in his redeeming work. This we know for he has promised and he has underscored that promise in the lives of little Canaanite mothers. 
Believe it! 

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, the abiding word.com.

From Mark Copeland.... The Allegory Of Hagar And Sarah (Galatians 4:21-31)



                     "THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS"

               The Allegory Of Hagar And Sarah (4:21-31)

INTRODUCTION

1. In the first four chapters of Galatians, Paul defends...
   a. His apostleship as being from God, not man - Ga 1-2
   b. His gospel of justification by faith in Christ, not by the Law of
      Moses - Ga 3-4

2. In defending the gospel of justification by faith in Christ, Paul
   makes five arguments...
   a. Personal argument - the Galatians' own experience - Ga 3:1-5
   b. Scriptural argument - the testimony of the Old Testament - Ga 3:
      6-25
   c. Practical argument - how one becomes a son and heir of God - Ga 3:
      26-4:7
   d. Sentimental argument - appealing to their relationship with Paul
      - Ga 4:8-20
   e. Allegorical argument - using Hagar and Sarah as an illustration
      - Ga 4:21-31

3. In this study, we will consider Paul's allegorical argument...
   a. "Allegory" comes from Greek allos (other) and agoreuein (to speak
      in public)
   b. An allegory is "a figurative representation conveying a meaning
      other than and in addition to the literal" - Wikipedia

4. It is important to note...
   a. "Paul does not deny the actual historical narrative, but he simply
      uses it in an allegorical sense to illustrate his point for the
      benefit of his readers who are tempted to go under the burden of
      the law" - Robertson's Word Pictures
   b. "the apostle gives an allegorical interpretation to the historical
      narrative of Hagar and Sarah, not treating that narrative as an
      allegory in itself" - Smith's Bible Dictionary

[To better understand Paul's allegorical argument, perhaps it is best to
first review...]

I. THE HISTORICAL ACCOUNT

   A. SARAH AND HAGAR...
      1. Sarah, who is barren, has a handmaiden named Hagar - Gen 16:1
      2. Sarah gives Hagar to Abraham to bear a child in her place - Gen 16:2-3
      3. Hagar conceives and despises her mistress Sarah - Gen 16:4
      4. Sarah deals harshly with Hagar - Gen 16:5-6
      5. Hagar returns to Sarah, and bears Ishmael - Gen 16:7-16

   B. ISHMAEL AND ISAAC...
      1. God promises that Sarah will have a son - Gen 17:15-17
      2. God confirms the covenant will be through Isaac, not Ishmael
         - Gen 17:18-21
      3. Sarah bears Isaac as God promised - Gen 21:1-8
      4. Sarah has Abraham send Hagar away - Gen 21:9-14

[With the historical account of Hagar and Sarah fresh on our minds, we
now turn to...]

II. THE APOSTOLIC APPLICATION

   A. PAUL REVIEWS THE HISTORICAL ACCOUNT...
      1. Abraham had two sons - Ga 4:21-22a
      2. One (Ishmael) by a slave woman (Hagar) - Ga 4:22b
      3. One (Isaac) by a free woman (Sarah) - Ga 4:22b
      4. The son of the slave was born of the flesh - Ga 4:23a
         a. Ishmael's conception was natural
         b. When Abraham went into Hagar
      5. The son of the free woman was born through promise - Ga 4:23b
         a. Isaac's conception was by God's power - cf. He 11:11-12
         b. As promised by God - cf. Gen 21:1-2

   A. PAUL APPLIES THE ALLEGORICAL ELEMENTS...
      1. The two women are two covenants - Ga 4:24-27
         a. Hagar represents Mount Sinai in Arabia, bearing children for
            slavery
            1) She corresponds to present Jerusalem
            2) She is in slavery with her children
         b. Sarah represents Jerusalem above, those who are free
            1) She corresponds to heaven (the New Jerusalem)
            2) She is 'our mother' (those in Christ)
            3) She who was barren is no longer desolate
      2. Those in Christ are like Isaac - Ga 4:28-31
         a. They too are children of promise
         b. They too have been persecuted
            1) Ishmael (born of the flesh) persecuted Isaac (born
               according to promise)
            2) Judaizing teachers (born of the flesh) persecuted
               Christians (born according to the Spirit)
         c. The Scriptures portend what will be the end
            1) The son of the slave woman (i.e., Judaizing teachers)
            2) Will not inherit with the son of the free woman (i.e.,
               those in Christ)
         d. Those in Christ...
            1) Are children of the free woman (heaven above)
            2) Are not of the slave (present Jerusalem, with the Law of
               Moses)

CONCLUSION

1. Thus Paul illustrates why the Galatians should not heed the Judaizing
   teachers...
   a. It would be a return to slavery (to the Law of Moses)
   b. It would be turning their back on the Spirit who conceived them
      - cf. Tit 3:5-7
   c. It would be turning away from the promises of heaven - cf. He 12:
      22-25

2. Our threat today might not be from Judaizing teachers...
   a. But there are those who would have us turn away from Christ
      1) Voices in the world
      2) False religions
   b. The end result would be the same
      1) A return to slavery - cf. Jn 8:31-34
      2) Falling short of receiving the promises - cf. He 4:1-2,11

Only by remaining in Christ can we be the free children of promise, with
Jerusalem above as our true mother...! - cf. Re 2:10c; 3:12


Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011

eXTReMe Tracker 

9/9/13

From Jim McGuiggan... Matthew 15:21-28: A little Canaanite woman

Matthew 15:21-28: A little Canaanite woman

Jesus entered the region of an old enemy of Israel. The old Phoenician kingdom centred in Tyre and Sidon came under the rule of Ethbaal, a priest of Astarte who slew his royal predecessor and was father of an infamous daughter, the princess of Sidon, Jezebel. She married Ahab, ruled the roost, turned Israel to Baal worship and scared the fearless Elijah witless. She's listed as among the great evils of Ahab (1 Kings 16). The passing years had made a difference, of course, but old memories and old enmities die hard and live long. Jews cared little for non-Jews but they harboured special feelings toward Samaritans and Sidonians (even if they were Greeks—see Mark 7:26).
Matthew reduces the entire incident to the truths he wants to stress. Jesus, in whom the kingdom of God was being revealed, entered this "foreign" region and before you know it ("suddenly" says the JB or "just then" says the NRSV on 15:22—the Greek has "look") there's a woman (apparently) following them all the way into some house (see Mark 7:24-30). As she follows she keeps calling on Jesus, the son of David (a Messianic title), to show her mercy in connection with her daughter.
Jesus keeps moving and says not a word to her. The disciples grow tired of her and repeatedly (an imperfect tense is used) ask him to, "send her away, for she keeps crying out after us" (15:23). Jesus responds to that remark in 15:24 and he is not addressing the woman; he's speaking to the disciples, so we have to wonder at the "but" with which 15:24 begins. The NIV and NRSV ignore the "but" though it's not ignored—and shouldn't be—by the KJV and others.
Here's the little problem. If they say, "Chase her away" and Jesus says, "But I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" it's a little difficult to understand his response to them. Some versions ignore the "but" and allow us to think he's addressing the woman. In other words, the disciples say chase her away and Jesus does just that by telling her he wasn't sent to help the likes of her.
But we have no reason to think Jesus was speaking to her (note the opening of 15:23). Most and perhaps all the versions have the disciples saying, "Chase her away" or something like it but that makes it difficult to understand him if he is speaking to them and when we allow the "but" to stand. "But I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" makes little sense if he's speaking to them. 
I think it's better to understand that they were implying that he should grant her request so that they could be done with her. [The word used for "send away" is also used to mean release or free or loose (it's used of Barabbas) or of forgiveness. See Matthew 18:27 and Luke 13:12 where it is used of a woman "loosed" from her illness.]
Whatever we make of the word used, Jesus' response to the disciples' repeated request seems to suggest that they wanted him to give her what she kept asking for. He reminded them that his mission was to Israel. They knew that, of course, and were glad of it; but they knew he had healed a Gentile centurion's servant. Still, they had no heart for this situation because if they wanted her freed from her suffering (due to her daughter's illness) it was only so they could be rid of her.
Finally the woman gets to him and kneels before him asking for help (15:25). He tells her it isn't right to take the children's food and give it to the dogs. We read that and take offence (sort of) but Matthew records it without any sense that there's rudeness in it; he isn't embarrassed in any way by Jesus. Jesus isn't implying that she or those like her are in a class with dogs. He insists on Israel's primary place in the unfolding drama of redemption—he was never embarrassed about that truth either (compare John 4:22 for a tonally important text).
Still, though he isn't insulting her he's provoking her, knowing that she's up to it. She makes it clear that she doesn't want "the children" to be left without food—she would just like some of the crumbs that fall around the table while the children are being fed. "I'll settle for the crumbs," she shrewdly and passionately responds.
Why is he making it difficult for this woman? We need to bear in mind that she might not have thought he was doing that; because she had love for a suffering daughter that made all apparent racial slurs, racial enmity, needling remarks, or whatever, feel like no burden at all (compare Genesis 29:18-20). But she had more than that and Jesus knew it! He had met another couple of foreigners, a centurion and a woman of (probably) ill-repute and a Samaritan into the bargain and both of them showed remarkable faith. They showed faith that should have made proud Jews feel ashamed. And here is another foreigner that proud Jews wanted rid off—a nuisance at best, they thought her to be. But Jesus provokes her and brings out before their eyes what was really in her.
Had she come and politely asked for help and been given it with hardly a word exchanged we would never have known—nor would the proud Jewish disciples—that this woman indeed had "great faith". I don't believe he worked with the woman as he did, to teach her a lesson of patience and fine stubbornness (see Luke 18:1-8) though she would have learned that. He didn't commend her for her patience or stubbornness. He commended her for her great faith. Once again "the children" had seen that someone outside the family had shown such faith in Jesus as would embarrass a host of Israelites. (This "foreign" element is prominent in Matthew along with the "Israel first" notion. It culminates in Matthew 28:19, and see 8:10-13.)
Let me repeat: Jesus doesn't commend her for her love of her daughter, her patience or her willingness to put up with jibes though all those were in her. He commends her for believing that the God who sent this Saviour to Israel to feed his children would not begrudge crumbs to a needy non-family member. She believed that the God who was now showing his reign in Jesus of Nazareth and showing his faithful love to his children would know how she felt about her child. She believed that God was so showing his power in and through Jesus that just the crumbs or scraps from his table would be more than adequate for her needs.
This remarkable faith was brought out into the open by Christ's prodding. Israel had much to learn from such a woman and Christ saw to it that they got the message. Christ was for the world and not just Israel! And many outside of Israel would have a vision of Jesus that Israel would have been jealous of.
And, anyway, who's to say he wasn't smiling as he bandied words with her?

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, the abiding word.com.

From Mark Copeland... True Friends And False Friends (Galatians 4:16-20)



                     "THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS"

                True Friends And False Friends (4:16-20)

INTRODUCTION

1. Friends can be a wonderful blessing...
   a. A source of comfort in times good and bad - Pr 17:17
   b. A source of good counsel - Pr 27:9

2. It is not always easy to know who your true friends are...
   a. Sometimes a true friend tells you what you don't want to hear
   b. Sometimes a false friend tells you what you do want to hear

3. In writing to the Galatians, Paul found it necessary to remind them
   of that truth...
   a. As he defended the gospel of justification by faith in Christ
   b. As he battled against the influence of those who sought to bind
      the Law of Moses

[In the course of reasoning with the Galatians on sentimental grounds,
Paul has some things to say about "True Friends And False Friends" (Ga
4:16-20).  We can glean from Paul's words that...]

I. TRUE FRIENDS SAY WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR

   A. THEY WILL TELL YOU THE TRUTH...
      1. Even if it makes them your enemy - Ga 4:16
      2. Even when the tone hurts - Ga 4:20
      -- Paul had been a true friend to his brethren

   B. YOU NEED TRUE FRIENDS...
      1. When hearing the gospel of Christ
         a. Who will tell you the full gospel as preached by Christ and
            His apostles - Mk 16:15-16
         b. Not just what is popularly believed, or what may appeal to
            our sensitivities - Ga 1:8-9
      2. When growing in grace
         a. Who will tell us of the need to grow, and the danger of
            apostasy - 2Pe 3:17-18
         b. Not just tickling our ears with things we enjoy hearing
            - 2Ti 4:3-4
      3. When drifting from God
         a. As Paul reached out to the Galatians in our text - Ga 4:
            19-20
         b. As Paul encouraged them to do the same to others - Ga 6:1
      -- Do we appreciate the value of such friends in our lives?

   C. HEED THE WISDOM OF DAVID AND SOLOMON...
      1. "Let the righteous strike me; it shall be a kindness. And let
         him rebuke me; it shall be as excellent oil; let my head not
         refuse it." - Ps 141:5a
      2. "Poverty and shame will come to him who disdains correction,
         but he who regards a rebuke will be honored." - Pr 13:18
      3. "The ear that hears the rebukes of life will abide among the
         wise. He who disdains instruction despises his own soul, but he
         who heeds rebuke gets understanding." - Pr 15:31-32
      4. "Like an earring of gold and an ornament of fine gold is a wise
         rebuker to an obedient ear." - Pr 25:12

[May we always appreciate the value of true friends.  On the other
hand...]

II. FALSE FRIENDS SAY WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO HEAR

   A. THEY WILL TELL YOU WHAT THEY WANT...
      1. When it makes you on their side - Ga 4:17
      2. When you have something they want - cf. Ga 6:12-13
      -- The Judaizing teachers were not true friends of the Galatians

   B. YOU NEED TO BEWARE OF FALSE FRIENDS...
      1. When you are being courted with zeal
         a. Their motives may not be right - Ga 4:17; cf. Ro 16:17-18
         b. Their knowledge may be wrong - cf. Ro 10:1-2
      2. When you are being manipulated
         a. As the false teachers were trying to manipulate the
            Galatians - Ga 4:17
         b. A tactic first used by Satan, and since by many others
            - 2Co 11:3,13-15; 2Pe 2:1-3
      3. When you are pursued only in their presence
         a. Paul sought their devotion even in his absence - Ga 4:18;
            cf. Php 1:27; 2:12
         b. False friends often forget about you when they are no longer
            with you
      -- Do we appreciate the danger of the wrong kind of friends?

   C. HEED THE WISDOM OF SOLOMON...
      1. "Fervent lips with a wicked heart are like earthenware covered
         with silver dross. He who hates, disguises it with his lips,
         and lays up deceit within himself; when he speaks kindly, do
         not believe him, for there are seven abominations in his heart;
         though his hatred is covered by deceit, his wickedness will be
         revealed before the assembly." - Pr 26:23-26
      2. "Open rebuke is better than love carefully concealed. Faithful
         are the wounds of a friend, but the kisses of an enemy are
         deceitful." - Pr 27:5-6

CONCLUSION

1. Many people have been led astray by the wrong kind of friends...
   a. Good habits have been corrupted by bad company - 1Co 15:33
   b. Immature Christians have been tossed around by cunning and
      deceitful teachers - Ep 4:14

2. May we learn from the interaction between Paul and the Galatians...
   a. True friends say what you need to hear
   b. False friends say what they want you to hear

Speaking of true friends, the greatest friend we can have is Jesus... -
cf. Jn 15:13-14



Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011

eXTReMe Tracker 

From Gary... Going up a tree






















This picture is from my granddaughter, Elizabeth (Lizzy).  As usual, I think she has a unique take on things, as the angle of this tree testifies.  When I saw this one, I thought of the walk I had with my dogs this morning and how the birds in the trees were especially full of chatter.  I couldn't see them, of course, but my imagination ran wild.  My mind went back to numerous dog-walks, particularly a number of them where we stopped at the bottom of Palamino Drive to view our friend Jasper the squirrel holding on to the bottom of the tree and eyeing us intently.  Not for a few seconds, mind you, but for SEVERAL MINUTES!!!   As I pondered these things I recalled a very recent Bible Reading; here is the passage I remembered...

Psalm 50
 1  The Mighty One, God, Yahweh, speaks,
and calls the earth from sunrise to sunset.
  2 Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty,
God shines out.
  3 Our God comes, and does not keep silent.
A fire devours before him.
It is very stormy around him.
  4 He calls to the heavens above,
to the earth, that he may judge his people:
  5 “Gather my saints together to me,
those who have made a covenant with me by sacrifice.”
  6 The heavens shall declare his righteousness,
for God himself is judge.
Selah.
  7 “Hear, my people, and I will speak;
Israel, and I will testify against you.
I am God, your God.
  8 I don’t rebuke you for your sacrifices.
Your burnt offerings are continually before me.
  9 I have no need for a bull from your stall,
nor male goats from your pens.
  10 For every animal of the forest is mine,
and the livestock on a thousand hills.
  11 
I know all the birds of the mountains.
The wild animals of the field are mine.
  12 If I were hungry, I would not tell you,
for the world is mine, and all that is in it.

  13 Will I eat the flesh of bulls,
or drink the blood of goats?
  14 Offer to God the sacrifice of thanksgiving.
Pay your vows to the Most High.
  15 Call on me in the day of trouble.
I will deliver you, and you will honor me.”

God loves animals; they are HIS!!!  But HIS priority is our well-being.  Our desire to please HIM is HIS DESIRE!!!  HE WANTS US more than all the animals put together. If you have any doubt about this, read verse 15 again.  I guess I loved Lizzie's picture so much because it was taken from Jaspers' perspective. Perhaps putting yourself in a lowly animals place is a good thing, because that is what God did with us.  Jesus humbled himself and became like us to save us from our own foolishness, stubbornness and SIN.  Look at the picture once more and THINK.  If you don't feel humble, you need to keep looking.  Doesn't do it for you??  OK, try thinking NUTS!!!

ps.  Thanks Lizzie, for being YOU!!!

9/8/13

From Gary... Please, don't add any more fences








Price park in Dade City has become one of my favorite places.  I take the dogs there several times a week- and they run and run and are free.  They never stay more than an hour (its Florida after all and we generally go about lunch- so its 90 already) and I know when it is time to go because they will stand in front of the inner locke at the left and wait to be taken out.  The thing is- the dog walk is only about a few hundred or so feet square, so in reality its not that big (to me).  But to them it must seem huge!  I was looking at this collection of pictures stitched together and thought of the law.  How it had boundaries, designed to prevent you from displeasing God.  But, to some people there just aren't enough fences in the world, so they add more. Its about control after all, so the more the merrier.  Enter tradition and your area for "running" gets smaller and smaller until you can only walk and finally- crawl.  This is what the Pharisees did with their traditions.  I suppose they might have meant well (I am being generous), but it had the effect of counteracting the Word of God.  Take the following exchange for example...

Matthew, Chapter 15

 1 Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem, saying,  2 “Why do your disciples disobey the tradition of the elders? For they don’t wash their hands when they eat bread.” 


  3  He answered them, “Why do you also disobey the commandment of God because of your tradition?   4  For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’  and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him be put to death.’   5  But you say, ‘Whoever may tell his father or his mother, “Whatever help you might otherwise have gotten from me is a gift devoted to God,”   6  he shall not honor his father or mother.’ You have made the commandment of God void because of your tradition.   7  You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, 
  8  ‘These people draw near to me with their mouth, 
and honor me with their lips; 
but their heart is far from me. 
  9  And in vain do they worship me, 
teaching as doctrine rules made by men.’” 

There is nothing wrong with tradition; but when it is accounted as being on an equal par with the Word of God, then it is dangerous.  Dangerous because a mere human being can think they are as powerful as the Almighty.  Idolatry, pure and simple.   Now, when we go to the dog-walk, the dogs somehow seem to know not to try to jump over the fence or to burrow underneath it.  They just run and play, do their business and otherwise just be the Canines they are.  I like that idea. Just be who you are.  Don't fight God!  Don't try to make null what HE wants you to do.  As usual, attitude is paramount!!!  You know- you can learn a lot from a dog!!!!


ps. The picture is only of the locke and a small area that protrudes at the front--  The whole dog-run is maybe three hundred feet square in addition to this part.

From Jim McGuiggan... Matthew 12:43-45 and demonic squatters

Matthew 12:43-45 and demonic squatters

What's the point of Matthew 12:43-45 and how does it relate to us? Without entering into a rehearsal of recent scholarly opinion maybe it’s safe to say that there’s enough information about the origins of the Pharisees to warrant us saying that they protested the apostasy of Israel that came about in the days of the Seleucid kings. Given this kind of setting they meant to keep Israel from a full-scale departure from the Torah as the expressed will of God. Perhaps they didn’t have as much influence in the Palestine of Jesus’ day—as Neusner, Sanders and others have taught us—but it’s clear from the New Testament and some references from Josephus that they weren’t a mousy little sect that practiced a quietist religion. (If they nurtured a Saul of Tarsus some of them must have been fiery indeed.) It’s true that Jesus seemed always to be in conflict with them but he did teach his disciples to pay attention to them though he had serious criticisms about their overall view and practice (Matthew 23:2-3, 25-28).
In what Arthur Gossip called "a shuddery little tale" Christ spoke to (or at least in the presence of) these Jewish leaders (12:2,14,24,38) about the owner of a house that was haunted (so to speak) by a demonic squatter who then (presumably) was driven from the house. The owner scrubbed the place spotless, papered and painted it and left it like that—scrubbed spotless and orderly. But empty! Meanwhile the demon wandered through waterless/wilderness places and finding no rest decided, he said, to "return to my house" (12:44). When he got back he found it even more suitable to him so he invited seven more squatter-friends even more vile than he into that scrubbed and orderly house. Christ said the latter situation was even worse than the first.
I want to take it that the Pharisees had enough influence in the land to be blind leaders of the blind (Matthew 15:1-14). I also want to link the cleansing of the house with something like the rejection of idolatry and pagan ways, which showed up in the days of John Hyrcanus and the Hasmoneans. The Pharisee types would have been leaders in this revolt against pagan uncleanness. That would indeed have been a work of God and it could easily be expressed in a parable about the removal of a demon from a house (a person or a generation). But a work begun is not a work ended and instead of filling the house with warmth and goodness, mercy and faithfulness it was scrubbed till it shone, ordered until it looked like a mausoleum—a place for dead mean’s bones (see 23:27). Paganism was cast out and in its place they substituted a spotless, ordered emptiness and into it rushed a greater demonism that just loved spotless and ordered emptiness.
A generation (12:39,45) that would see life as consisting of nothing but choices between two evil choices is in sad, bad trouble. To choose moral evil and be like publicans and sinners (characterized in Luke 15 as a selfish and immoral brat) or a spotless, ordered emptiness (characterized in Luke 15 as a sour, duty-conscious and self-righteous brother) is no good choice at all. Here comes the Christ, the possibilities are enormous and hope is alive again. Not to seize the moment and turn to God in full joy and righteousness is to prepare for future misery-—worse than they had known. Israel brought polished emptiness or brattish immorality with them into the temple. What would all that bring into the temple berfore very long? I think 70 AD and Jerusalem’s destruction hovers in the background (compare Matthew 23:29-39).
The issue here involves more than just individuals. It involves generations and even nations. Do you think it's possible to look back on history and see the work of God casting out demonic structures and world-views that weren't followed up by the generation? Have we any reason to believe that evil structures have fallen and others at least as evil have rushed in to fill the vacancy? Have we the record of such things in biblical history? Is it going on before our very eyes? And our individual lives? What happened when the USSR collapsed? And when the Berlin Wall came down? How might all that speak to us? You tell me.

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, the abiding word.com.