9/18/13

From Gary... Just for fun


















If you know who Ray Charles is, then you will recognize this picture.  He had a fantastic voice and stage presence.  And I remember many of his songs, including the one sung in the video, which I labelled "Just for fun" above.  By the way; I just kept smiling all the way through it.  Whether it was the bird or my recollection of the movie (The Blues Brothers) I don't know and really don't care.  Life is too short and somehow there just can't be enough smiles and happiness here on this Earth.  As I think of this bit of foolishness, indulge me, as I relate a passage from the New Testament...

Acts, Chapter 12

 1 Now about that time, King Herod stretched out his hands to oppress some of the assembly.  2 He killed James, the brother of John, with the sword.  3 When he saw that it pleased the Jews, he proceeded to seize Peter also. This was during the days of unleavened bread.  4 When he had arrested him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four squads of four soldiers each to guard him, intending to bring him out to the people after the Passover.  5 Peter therefore was kept in the prison, but constant prayer was made by the assembly to God for him.  6 The same night when Herod was about to bring him out, Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains. Guards in front of the door kept the prison.

  7  And behold, an angel of the Lord stood by him, and a light shone in the cell. He struck Peter on the side, and woke him up, saying, “Stand up quickly!” His chains fell off from his hands.  8 The angel said to him, “Get dressed and put on your sandals.” He did so. He said to him, “Put on your cloak, and follow me.”  9 And he went out and followed him. He didn’t know that what was being done by the angel was real, but thought he saw a vision.  10
 When they were past the first and the second guard, they came to the iron gate that leads into the city, which opened to them by itself. They went out, and went down one street, and immediately the angel departed from him.

 11  When Peter had come to himself, he said, “Now I truly know that the Lord has sent out his angel and delivered me out of the hand of Herod, and from everything the Jewish people were expecting.” 12 Thinking about that, he came to the house of Mary, the mother of John who was called Mark, where many were gathered together and were praying.  13 When Peter knocked at the door of the gate, a maid named Rhoda came to answer.  14 When she recognized Peter’s voice, she didn’t open the gate for joy, but ran in, and reported that Peter was standing in front of the gate. 

  15  They said to her, “You are crazy!” But she insisted that it was so. They said, “It is his angel.” 16 But Peter continued knocking. When they had opened, they saw him, and were amazed.


Peter was miraculously release from prison and went to the house of Mary.  I can only imagine the scene at Mary's house; but what I can visualize is funny!!! Well, it is funny to me, anyway.  However, please remember.... I AM A BIRD OF A DIFFERENT FEATHER!!!  

From Jim McGuiggan... ENTER THE DRAGON

ENTER THE DRAGON

The gospel calls the NT elect to war. To war not against flesh and blood but against the malignant forces and powers that hold humanity in captivity. Life in the kingdom of God and his Christ is pictured in Revelation as a righteous assault against seven-headed beasts, against overwhelming numbers and humanity-hating "Orks". To offer less than that call to bright, brave, gallant young men and women is to risk boring them and having them walk away from the Body of Christ in search of righteous war and engagement against the enemy in some other place and way.
As presented in scripture, in prose and poetry, in narrative and apocalyptic literature Satan is the implacable enemy of God and all that God cherishes. I take it that Satan is a spiritual being, a malevolent spirit that has earned the reputation as leader of all that opposes God and his Lord Christ. But he’s more than that. Beyond his own personal hatred and spite, his name stands for any other form of rebellion or corruption arising at any time in any quadrant of God’s creation. So if we say this act or that is “satanic” we don’t mean that Satan personally did it or personally commissioned it; we mean it is of his character, it accords with his spirit, it moves in the direction of his own agenda. He sets the tone for whatever is anti-God, anti-life and pro-death.
The scriptures present him as a personal being who seduced mankind into sinful rebellion against God and brought on them the judgment of God. In urging them to sin he was seeking their pain, their loss and their death and the curse of God did fall on us in response to that pride-filled disobedience (see Genesis 3:16-19 and 6:1-7:24). In bringing this pain and disease and loss down on us Satan meant it for evil but God meant it for good because his wrath against sin is only another face of his mercy and grace. Since Satan encouraged the original human apostasy it won’t surprise us to find that in some texts disease and loss and even death are laid at Satan’s feet.

The Dragon’s Agenda

Satan’s agenda is to wreck and ruin. There are suggestions in scripture that Satan rebelled against God. There is explicit mention of angelic rebellion in places like 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6 and while there is no express mention of Satan in those texts they open the door for the reasonableness of a satanic apostasy. We presume Satan was created by God and since God cannot create what is inherently (by creation) evil we presume that Satan made himself God’s enemy.
There’s no reason at all to think that Satan thinks he can dethrone God! In the movie Gladiator a Roman officer surveys the ranks of the enemy who are about to engage in a battle they can’t possibly win and wonders why they won’t admit it. His general asks him, “Would we?” We continue to pursue lost causes for a variety of reasons fed by numerous motivations and if you hate a man savagely enough you’d be willing to bring the house down on yourself if you thought it would do him an injury. In light of his looming defeat in World War II Hitler made it very clear that whether the Nazi regime would win or lose:
We shall not capitulate…no, never. We may be destroyed
but if we are, we shall drag a world with us…a world in flames…
But even if we could not conquer them, we should drag half
the world into destruction with us and leave no one to triumph
over Germany. There will not be another 1918.
 
The apocalyptic visions of Revelation show the Dragon, who is identified with the great Serpent and Satan (Revelation 12:9; 20:2, and see Romans 16:20 with Genesis 3:14-15), at war with the Lamb and his armies. He seeks the destruction of the child born to be King and when thwarted in that he turns on the children of God (Revelation 12:1-5, 13-17). And he makes it his business to deceive the nations so that they will worship the beast and the Dragon who gives power to the beast (Revelation 13:4-14) rather than God.
In the poetry of John Milton we’re given a spellbinding description of Satan’s fanatical hatred and opposition to God. Early in Book I though racked with deep despair Satan smolders in “immortal hate” and hisses to Beelzebub, his chief ally, that his mind is fixed and that he will never bow to knee to God or sue for grace. Beelzebub wants to know the point of continuing a battle they can’t win when all they’d get is more defeat and Satan rebukes him for weakness and tells him:
                   Fallen Cherub, to be weak is miserable,
                   Doing or suffering: but of this be sure
                   To do aught good never will be our task,
                   But ever to do ill our sole delight,
                   As being contrary to His high will
                   Whom we resist. If then His providence
                   Out of our evil seek to bring forth good,
                   Our labour must be to pervert that end,
                   And out of good still to find means of evil.
 
He looks around at the desolation and gloom that has now become his kingdom and he insists that the farther from God he is the better. And with a tone of finality he sets his awful course,
                   Farewell, happy fields,
                   Where joy forever dwells! Hail, horrors! hail,
                   Infernal World! And thou, profoundest Hell,
                   Receive thy new possessor one who brings
                   A mind not to be changed by place or time.
                   The mind is its own place, and in itself
                   Can make a Heaven out of Hell, a Hell out of Heaven.
                   What matter where, if I be still the same…
                   Here at least we shall be free…
                   Here we may reign secure; and, in my choice,
                   To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
                   Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.
 
With this he goes off to build his capital, the great city Pandemonium, to which he gathers his despairing host of followers to, “Consult how we may most offend.” Finding them whimpering and beaten he so rages that with words without substance he raises their courage and dispels their fears. Flags are raised, trumpets are blown and the vast host begins to shout in unison, and with swords and lances beating on their shields they frighten the Night as they swear eternal hatred against God and all he loves.
This is what drives the Dragon’s agenda!
In Book 2 the satanic council admits they can’t harm God directly but rather than sit and nurse their eternal wounds in the dark Beelzebub tells of a new world where God’s darling children live and advises that the evil hosts should attack him by attacking them. It would even be better if the inhabitants of the new world were seduced into joining ranks with them since this would add bitterness to God’s pain when he punished the newcomers for their satanic rebellion.
                   Though Heaven be shut,
                   And Heaven’s high Arbitrator sit secure
                   In his own strength, this place may lie exposed,
                   The utmost border of his kingdom, left
                   To their defence who hold it: here, perhaps,
                   Some advantageous act may be achieved
                   By sudden onset either with Hell-fire
                   To waste his whole creation…or, if not drive,
                   Seduce them to our party…This would surpass
                   Common revenge, and interrupt His joy
                   In our confusion…when his darling sons,
                   Hurled headlong to partake with us, shall curse
                   Their frail original, and faded bliss
 
That is Satan’s agenda and so he works to seduce humans to turn against God because from his own experience he knows full well, “Who overcomes by force hath overcome but half his foe.” In seducing the humans he gives grief to God and interrupts God’s pleasure in the satanic defeat. If he, Satan must suffer, then God will suffer also by the loss of his children as they join in the satanic rebellion. This is the Dragon’s agenda.
“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.” 2 Corinthians 11:3.
That agenda is driven by his ceaseless and rabid hatred of God and he means to seduce us into betraying the Holy Father. John Milton pictures Satan spying on the humans in the garden and taking delight and pleasure from their innocence and joy that he says just melts him. Satan even feels sorry for them, says he isn’t really their foe and wishes he wasn’t going to do what he has in mind. Still, whatever it might cost the humans he purposes to ease his spleen on God by hurting what God loves and by using those God dearly loves he means to grieve God. The humans are tools and nothing more. Satan makes it clear it’s God he’s raging against and not the humans. So though he says he isn’t their foe and that he’s feel sorry that they will lose so much, he means to use them against God by making a pact of mutual friendship with them and give them hell instead of Paradise (midway through Book IV).
                     To you whom I could pity thus forlorn,
                        Though I unpitied.
                        League with you I seek,
                        And mutual amity, so strait, so close…

                        Hell shall unfold,
                        To entertain you two…

                        Thank him who puts me, loath, to this revenge
                        On you, who wrong me not, for him who wronged.                            
And for all his evil he blames God! He wouldn’t want to conquer this new world or rob the humans of their innocence and bring them eternal loss if God hadn’t forced him to do it.
I find Milton’s point here especially revealing. He has God’s arch enemy refusing to take the blame. Though he earlier talks his hellish followers into a frenzied rage against God, swearing that they will do no good but only harm and will even work harm out of all the good that is—despite all that impenitent swearing he claims the higher moral ground and blames God for the whole calamitous result. And because that’s his nature it is his agenda to lead the humans in the same path blame everyone else! Especially blame God!
Luke 9 twice tells us that Jesus had set his face top go to Jerusalem to meet his destiny in this phase of God’s will.  But it wasn’t only a moment of crisis for Jesus when he got to Jerusalem it was a moment of crisis for Jerusalem when Jesus got there. What would they do with him when he forced them to make a choice?
Something similar happens if we turn the cry of dereliction around and put it in God’s mouth. Jesus in truth represented not only humans before God but God before humans. In Jesus Christ humanity could look at the judgment their sins had brought down on them and in agony ask their Holy Father why he had forsaken them. But there, looking down at them from the cross is their God who asks them in return, “My children, my children, why have you forsaken me?”
Astonishing truth this, that God was prepared to spill his blood to gain our good will while the Dragon with hissing lies talked us into notions of godhood, of self-reliance and self-actualization. With arrogance and insolent ignorance we told God we had had enough of him and would take care of ourselves! “Freedom” tasted so good but it was a shameful freedom and a destructive liberty. Hugh R. Mackintosh, brilliant Scots theologian and preacher, preached a sermon he called Love’s Refusal. In Exodus 21 Israel was told to let the fellow-Israelite slave go free in the seventh year. Many of them must have eagerly counted the days but there were times when the one who came as a slave (due to debt or some such thing) learned to love the master and to develop ties in that home; ties he didn’t want to break. So he would refuse the freedom saying, “I love my master and my wife and children and do not want to go free.”
At this Mackintosh responds, “Freedom is good and Christ gives it abundantly; but freedom without Christ, freedom rather to put Christ away is evil through and through. Freedom is sweet, but what are all its joys if to taste them we must leave our best friend behind? Whatever we must renounce is as nothing to that which we have found in Him.”
The freedom offered by the sinister one could only be gained by base ingratitude, by a thankless and stupid heart that was blinded by corrupt and corrupting visions of false grandeur. It’s foolishness, of course, to pity God for he doesn’t need our pity, but isn’t it legitimate to see his brazen rejection as the foulest kind of treachery? Had he been a tyrant, had he tormented and narrowed us, had his treatment of us made us rue the day he made us—if any of that had been true would we not now look back on our rebellion and think of it with pride? But it wasn’t a brave insurrection; it was mean treachery. It wasn’t a gallant assault against an arrogant and harsh deity it was an arrogant, self-serving and stupid desertion.
Betrayal is so hard to take. You only have to read the story of Absalom’s treatment of his father David to sense the ugliness and shudder at it. Perhaps you came across the painful story some years ago of the woman who married an ex-con and loved him devotedly. A few years later he was accused of a very serious crime he didn’t commit but as a result of poor defence work he was sentenced to something like thirty years without parole. His wife was assured that if they had the money to get a top-notch lawyer he could get a retrial and be released. She took on extra jobs, scrubbed floors in office buildings at night, took in laundry, kept up her day job and lived on too little. Some years later, exhausted, looking much older and very thin she had enough money to get the lawyer. She hired him, they got the case reopened, he was set free and a few months later he went off with a younger and prettier woman. Betrayal is so hard to take.
Psalm 41 tells a sad story. The psalmist is ill, worn out with the struggle against the affliction and what’s worse he hasn’t treated God right. His enemies watch him in the throes of his agony and pretend to care. When they come to visit it’s really to see how quickly he’s sinking so that they can go and spread their good news about his bad news and to insinuate evil about him. Naturally that filled him with pain but what hurt him most was this (41:9), “Even my closest friend, whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.” There it is! And if the sufferer is king David, insult has been added to injury when the hero of the nation, the one to whom they owe so much, is despised.
Lord Byron, poor man, who knew what it was to turn to ruin by turning from God had this to say:

So the struck eagle, stretch'd upon the plain 
No more through rolling clouds to soar again,
View’d his own feather on the fatal dart,
And wing’d the shaft that quivered in his heart.

Keen were his pangs, but keener far to feel
He nursed the pinion which impelled the steel;

While the same plumage that had warmed his nest
Drank the last lifedrop of his bleeding breast.
 
Whatever mystery there is hidden in Christ’s cry to God, “Why have you forsaken me?” there’s mystery too when he turns his eyes on us and, speaking for God, wants to know from us, “Why have you forsaken me?” Can you explain it?
It is God who comes to our rescue, saving us from our sins (Matthew 1:21). He isn’t our enemy; he’s our redeemer. He and Satan are on opposite sides. It is Satan who would condemn the world and it is God who sent his Son into the world, we’re told expressly, not to condemn the world but to save it (John 3:16-17). It didn’t seem to matter to God that it was sinners he came to save; in truth, it was precisely because we were sinners and he knew it that he came to save us. It didn’t seem to matter to him that we didn’t want him—he wanted us! It didn’t seem to matter what we felt about him; what mattered was what he felt about us. It didn’t seem to matter that we didn’t want to be saved or that we wanted him out of our lives; he wanted to save us and to enter our lives.
Wouldn’t you think God would have more respect for himself? Wouldn’t you think he would prize his honor more highly than to come looking for a race that has treated him so insolently? Has he no shame? Is that why we forsook him—because he loved us too much? It’s from that God that Satan works to cut us off.
To be continued, God enabling

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, the abiding word.com.

From Mark Copeland... The Works Of The Flesh - III (Galatians 5:19-21)







                     "THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS"

                 The Works Of The Flesh - III (5:19-21)

INTRODUCTION

1. For several lessons we have focused on the "works of the flesh"
   listed in Ga 5:19-21

2. We have broken them up into several categories, including...
   a. Sins of moral impurity (adultery, fornication, uncleanness,
      lasciviousness)
   b. Idolatry and sorcery
   c. Infractions of the law of love (hatred, contentions, jealousies,
      outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies,
      envy)

3. In this study, we shall end our study of the works of the flesh by
   considering two sins...
   a. Drunkenness and revelries, which can be classified as sins of
      intemperance
   b. We shall also make an observation on the manner in which Paul
      concludes his list of the "works of the flesh"

[We begin by considering the two...]

IV. SINS OF INTEMPERANCE

   A. DRUNKENNESS (Grk., methe)...
      1. This word describes the state of intoxication due to alcohol
      2. The Bible is very strong in...
         a. Its condemnation of drunkenness - cf. 1Co 5:11; 6:9-10
         b. Its warning about the dangers of drinking - cf. Pr 20:1;
            23:29-35
      3. What about "drinking" that does not lead to "drunkenness"?
         a. The level of alcohol in modern day alcoholic beverages makes
            it difficult to distinguish between the two
            1) Levels of alcohol are much higher today due to advanced
               distilling techniques
            2) Some of the strongest drinks in the past were not much
               stronger than our mild beers today, thus making it much
               easier to get drunk today
            3) In ancient Greece there was very little drunkenness, for
               the normal practice was to dilute two parts of wine to
               three parts of water
         b. The Christian is also bound by the principle of influence
            - cf. Ro 14:13-21
            1) Should Christians engage in an activity (social drinking)
               that contributes to...
               a) The number one drug problem in our country? (1 in 9
                  are alcoholics)
               b) The senseless killing of 25,000 innocent victims a
                  year? (half of all driving related accidents involve
                  driving under the influence of alcohol)
               c) An estimated 25% of divorces? (which God hates - Mal 2:16)
            2) The responsibility of the Christian regarding influence
               is clear - Ro 14:21; 1Co 10:31-33
               a) Only the insensitive and selfish Christian would try
                  to justify engaging in social drinking today
               b) The mature Christian considers whether the practice
                  glorifies God, and benefits his fellow man

   B. REVELRIES, REVELLINGS, CAROUSING, ORGIES (Grk., komos)...
      1. This word refers to feasts and drinking parties that were often
         extended till late at night and indulge in revelry
      2. Such behavior is condemned not only here, but also in Ro 13:
         12-14
      3. Modern day forms of this sin would include what goes on at...
         a. Mardi Gras in New Orleans
         b. Many New Year's parties
         c. Some office Christmas' parties
         d. Some music concerts
      4. It does not require too much wisdom to see why such behavior is
         condemned
         a. How many friendships, marriages, etc., have been destroyed
            by unrestrained behavior
            that goes on at such functions?
         b. Even the "innocent" can often get caught up in the
            excitement and do something that ruins the rest of their
            life!
      5. In 1Pe 4:3-4, Peter states that...
         a. Such behavior as Christians is unbecoming
         b. The world thinks us strange for not engaging in such things

[The world may think us strange because we refrain from such things as
drunkenness and revelries; but as Peter goes on to say in 1Pe 4:5, all
will have to give an account to Him who is ready to judge the living and
the dead.  It is in view of the Judgment that prompts Christians to take
the "works of the flesh" seriously.  And not just those specifically
mentioned in Ga 5:19-21, but as Paul goes on to say...]

V. "...AND THE LIKE"

   A. CONCLUDING HIS LIST IN THIS WAY IMPLIES...
      1. Paul's list is not to be taken as all inclusive
      2. The sins listed are to give us a basic idea of the kind of
         things we are to avoid
      3. We must apply discernment on many activities which may not be
         specifically condemned in the Scriptures
         a. Many people want a "Thou shall not..." for anything to be
            wrong
         b. But the Bible does not list everything that is wrong (if it
            did, you would have to carry it around in a wheel barrow)
         c. Instead, we are given basic principles of conduct, with some
            specific examples to illustrate such principles
         d. We are expected to exercise discernment concerning good and
            evil using the principles found in the Scriptures - cf. He5:12-14

   B. DETERMINING THINGS THAT ARE "LIKE" THESE SINS...
      1. Today we are often faced with issues that may not be
         specifically mentioned in the Bible
         a. E.g., questions related to dancing, drugs, movies, music,
            smoking, television programs.
         b. How do I know when something not specifically addressed is
            right or wrong?
      2. One helpful way is to compare the activity in question to the
         two lists found in Ga 5:19-23
         a. Is the active "like" the works of the flesh?
         b. Or is it "like" the fruit of the Spirit?
      3. The better we understand these "works of the flesh" (as well as
         what constitutes the "fruit of the Spirit), the better we are
         to make decisions conducive to godly living

CONCLUSION

1. Such has been the purpose of our study:  to learn what sort of things
   constitute the "works of the flesh", so that we know what to avoid

2. For remember what Paul has written...

   "Those who practice SUCH THINGS will not inherit the kingdom of God"
                                                            (Ga 5:21)

3. Whether it be one of those things specifically listed, or something
   "such like" them, the consequences will be devastating!

4. In addition, the practice of such things makes it impossible to
   produce the fruit of the Spirit in our lives - cf. Ga 5:17

5. Finally:  the use of the word "practice" (Ga 5:21) implies that Paul
   is warning against those who persistently engage in such sins and
   refuse to repent...
   a. We have all been guilty of one or more of things that can keep us
      out of the kingdom of heaven
   b. But by God's grace anyone can receive forgiveness, as implied in
      this passage:

   "Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom
   of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor
   adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor
   covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit
   the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed,
   but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the
   Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God." (1Co 6:9-11)

If you are willing to give up the "practice" of such sins, you too can
have your sins washed away, finding sanctification and justification
through Jesus and the Spirit of God! - cf. Ac 2:38; 22:16

xecutable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011

9/17/13

From Jim McGuiggan... Matthew 2:13-15 and Hosea 11:1

Matthew 2:13-15 and Hosea 11:1

"Now after they had left, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, 'Get up, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you; for Herod is about to search for the child, to destroy him.' Then Joseph got up, took the child and his mother by night, and went to Egypt, and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, 'Out of Egypt I have called my son.' " (Matthew 2:13-15 with Hosea 11:1)
The phrase, "This was to fulfil" what the Lord said through the prophet makes it sound like Hosea 11:1 is a simple prediction. That is, it looks like Matthew says Hosea was speaking of an event many centuries after him when it's plainly the case that Hosea 11:1 is not a prediction at all but a comment about something that occurred centuries before Hosea was born.
Why would I say it is "plainly the case" that Hosea 11:1 is not a prediction but a comment on a past event? You only have to read the text to recognise that. Here's the text. "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son." What could be plainer? Ask fifty people to tell you what that sentence speaks of and I would venture to say all fifty would agree that it was talking about the time when God brought Israel out of Egypt at the Exodus. It could hardly be plainer!
Would it be that plain to Matthew? If it is so plain to us we'd have to conclude that it was that plain to Matthew or we'd think Matthew was intellectually/religiously and theological challenged. That won't do; it would be better to think Matthew knows as well as we do what the bare and isolated text indicates. That being the case, we need to look a bit deeper at how Matthew uses the notion of "fulfilment," his method of telling the Story and what in this case he has in mind. [Matthew's use of the "fulfilment" motif is a question for another time.]
The words in Hosea 11:1 are plain and the Exodus under Moses is clearly the event in view but why does God mention it? Has it no connection with the setting in which it occurs? We'd fully expect that it does and if so, how exactly does it fit in; what does it contribute to the overall context?
Let's suppose it's mentioned not only to underline God's past loving faithfulness to Israel but also to give assurance of his present and future commitment to Israel. What he did in the past—despite Israel's unfaithfulness even in Egypt—he will do in the future for an Israel that is now unfaithful. What if he's saying something like, "I have loved Israel from the beginning—as I showed at the Exodus—and you can be sure I will continue to love her"?
The prophet says (11:5) that faithless Israel who was brought out of Egypt (11:1, and see 2:15 and 12:13) will "return to the land of Egypt." He had already said this in 8:13, "...the Lord does not accept them. Now he will remember their iniquity, and punish their sins; they shall return to Egypt."
In historical fact, Israel (the northern kingdom) went into Assyrian captivity (11:5) but the prophet characterises that as a "return to Egypt."
Returning to Egypt is the undoing or the reversal of the Exodus so if God is to do her good in the future it would be a second Exodus (compare Isaiah 11:11). Once more God would call his son out of Egypt. That's what we would expect and it's precisely what we get in 11:11 when the faithful Lord delivers his faithless people. "How can I give you up, Ephraim…My heart recoils within me; my compassion grows warm and tender…I will not come in wrath…his children shall come trembling from the west. They shall come trembling like birds from Egypt…and I will return them to their homes, says the Lord." (Hosea 11:8-11)
Hosea doesn't see "Egypt" as a merely geographical term. For him as, I would suppose, for every Jew that takes his roots and heritage and theology seriously "Egypt" speaks of their fears, their past unfaithfulness, God's generous and holy grace and other profound truths. The idea that Matthew is simply matching the word Egypt with the word in Hosea 11 is a shallow approach to both writers and to the Spirit who speaks in them
In any case, Hosea's entire eleventh chapter is God's assurance in the face of human betrayal and Matthew believes that that assurance is fulfilled in Jesus. In Jesus Christ, Israel's representative and bearer of her hopes, the loving and faithful God calls Israel out of her Egypt once more and Matthew sees the life and ministry of Jesus as reflecting and fulfilling that deliverance. Matthew has more than geography on his mind when he sees the hope of Israel (Jesus) coming back home (see again Hosea 11:11 and see paragraphs 26-27 of this).

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, the abiding word.com.


Note: I am unsure as to whether or not I agree with Jim on this, but it is something I will consider... Gary

From Mark Copeland... The Works Of The Flesh - II (Galatians 5:19-21)



                     "THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS"

                 The Works Of The Flesh - II (5:19-21)

INTRODUCTION

1. Our study of the "works of the flesh" as found in Ga 5:19-21 now
   focuses on eight sins...
   a. They are "hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath,
      selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, envy" (NKJV)
   b. Which have been categorized as infractions of the law of love

2. Many find it hard to conceive that these eight sins are really all
   that terrible...
   a. Notice this news clipping that made the front page of the Orlando
      Sentinel (1/7/81) under the heading, "Pope Widens Sin Definition":
         "Pope John Paul II said today that sins of the flesh are not
      limited to fornication, orgies and drunkenness, but include
      idolatry, jealousy, envy and unfriendliness.
         "The pope made the remarks to his weekly general audience at
      the Vatican, his forum for the past 14 months on the subject of
      sex and sin.
         "In his latest discussion of the subject, the pope cited St.
      Paul, the first-century apostle, as giving Christianity a very
      wide definition of sins of the flesh.
         "'It is significant that when Paul speaks about the works of
      the flesh, he mentions not only fornication, impurity,
      libertinage, drunkenness and orgies which are the sins of sensual
      pleasure,' the pope said, 'but also speaks of other sins to which
      we are not accustomed to attribute a carnal and sensual character:
      idolatry, witchcraft, unfriendliness, discord, jealousy, dissent,
      divisions, factionalism, and envy.'"
   b. The heading made it sound like the pope is declaring something
      new, but as the pope himself stated, this is what Paul taught in
      the very passage we are studying

3. Indeed, what is said of immorality and drunkenness is also said of
   these eight sins:  "...those who practice such things will not
   inherit the kingdom of God"

[Therefore there is a great need to be informed as to what these sins
entail, and to make a concentrated effort to put them out of our
lives...]

III. SINS VIOLATING THE LAW OF LOVE

   A. HATRED, ENMITY (Grk., echthra)...
      1. Echthra means hostility, enmity, hatred - Strong
      2. It describes a state and attitude of mind toward other people
         which involves barriers between them and you
      3. Enmity is the direct opposite of love (agape); consider the
         contrast:
         a. agape - an attitude of mind which will never allow itself to
            be bitter to any man; always seeking the highest good of
            others
         b. echthra - the attitude which puts up barriers and draws the
            sword of division
      4. When we allow the work of the flesh to rule (e.g., echthra), we
         cannot allow the Spirit to produce the proper fruit in our
         lives (e.g., agape)

   B. CONTENTIONS, STRIFE, VARIANCE, DISCORD (Grk., eris)...
      1. Eris is the expression of enmity or hatred; it is the outcome
         in actual life of that state of mind
      2. Paul uses this word to describe one of the evils that was
         characteristic of the pagan world - Ro 1:28-29
      3. Sadly, it can also describe the condition that may exist in a
         church - cf. 1Co 1:11; 3:3
      4. This particular sin invades churches more often, perhaps, than
         many others
         a. Because of our tendency to categorize sins, we may allow
            this one to linger and  fester more than such sins as
            fornication, adultery
         b. Yet this sin is most destructive of Christian fellowship; it
            will just as easily destroy (maybe even more so) a local
            congregation as will sins of moral impurity

   C. JEALOUSIES, EMULATIONS (Grk., zelos)...
      1. Zelos can be either good or bad
         a. Used in a good way
            1) Isa 9:7 - "The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform
               this"
            2) Ro 10:1-2 - "...they have a zeal for God..."
            3) Used to describe an excitement of mind, ardor, fervor of
               spirit, for something good
         b. Used in a bad way
            1) 1Co 3:3 - "For where there are envy..."
            2) 2Co 12:20 - "For I fear...lest there be...jealousies..."
            3) A fervor of spirit that is misdirected, resulting in a
               form of envy and jealousy that is destructive of personal
               relationships
      2. Zeal that is misdirected is mostly directed toward self; i.e.,
         "selfish"
         a. When we are zealous for God, that is good
         b. When we are zealous in behalf of others' good welfare, that
            is good
         c. But when we are jealous for selfish reasons, it is wrong!
      3. Such jealousy was a mark of carnality in the Christians at
         Corinth - cf. 1Co 3:1-3
      4. In view of the coming of Christ, zelos (envy) is one of the
         "works of darkness" we need to cast off - Ro 13:11-14

   D. OUTBURSTS OF WRATH, FITS OF RAGE (Grk., thumos)...
      1. This word describes...
         a. The blaze of temper which flares into violent words and
            deeds
         b. The explosive temper which is uncontrolled
      2. Not to be confused with...
         a. Righteous indignation, which is proper and controlled; e.g.,
            the righteous indignation of God - Ro 2:4-11
         b. Anger which is properly checked and not allowed to produce
            an occasion for sin - cf. Ep 4:26-27
      3. Some try to excuse their explosive tempers as simply
         hereditary...
         a. "That is just the way I am"
         b. "I am just a fiery Irishman, a hot Italian, etc."
         c. "It is human nature"
      4. But Christians, no matter what their "nature", are blessed to
         become partakers of "divine nature", and must therefore put
         away these things - cf. 2Pe 1:3-4; Ep 4:31-32; Col 3:8-11

   E. SELFISH AMBITIONS, STRIFE, DISPUTES (Grk., eritheia)...
      1. This word describes a self-centered attitude in the doing of
         any work; for example...
         a. Working solely for money
         b. Seeking and holding political office purely for personal
            interests and ambition
         c. Doing the work of the Lord out of a desire for recognition,
            personal ambition, or rivalry
      2. It is used to describe those who were preaching Christ out of
         jealousy - cf. Php 1:17
      3. It is this word which describes those who create party
         divisions in the church...
         a. Who are acting out of vainglory and a desire to be first
         b. Rather than out of a true desire to stand for truth
      4. It is contrary to that "mind of Christ" described in Php 2:3-5

   F. DISSENSIONS, SEDITIONS (Grk., dichostasia)...
      1. This word literally means "a standing apart"
      2. It describes a condition where all fellowship, all togetherness
         are gone
         a. This was the condition in the church at Corinth - cf. 1Co 
            3:3
         b. Paul taught we should mark those who cause such divisiveness
            - Ro 16:17
      3. Such may be due to:
         a. Personal division (where two people refuse to speak to each
            other)
         b. Class division (i.e., class warfare between the rich and
            poor)
         c. Party division (where devotion to party rises above devotion
            to principle)
         d. Racial division (e.g., Jew vs. Gentile, Greek vs. barbarian,
            white vs. black)
         e. Theological division (misusing labels and fixing them
            unfairly on others)
         f. Ecclesiastical division (church division, especially in the
            form of denominationalism)
      4. This sin is committed when we confuse...
         a. Prejudice with principle
         b. Unreasonable stubbornness with unwavering resolution

   G. HERESIES, FACTIONS (Grk., hairesis)...
      1. It most commonly denotes a group belonging to a particular
         school of thought or action
         a. Such as the "sect" of the Sadducees - Ac 5:17
         b. Or the "sect" of the Pharisees - Ac 15:5
      2. Peter used it to describe false teachers who will bring in
         destructive divisions - 2Pe 2:1
      3. Thus it refers to divisiveness, especially that brought about
         by false teaching
      4. This word came to mean a belief or doctrine which is contrary
         to orthodoxy or the truth

   H. ENVY, ENVYING (Grk., pthonos)...
      1. William Barclay offers this distinction between phthonos and
         zelos:
         a. zelos is the envy which casts grudging looks
         b. phthonos is the envy which has arrived at hostile deeds
      2. We might also add this distinction:
         a. zelos is less serious, less bitter, less malignant than
            phthonos
         b. But zelos, left unchecked, can result in phthonos
      3. Whereas zelos has both a good and bad sense, phthonos is always
         bad
         a. It was phthonos that moved the Jewish leaders to deliver
            Jesus to Pilate - Mt 27:18
         b. phthonos is indicative of a reprobate mind that has denied
            God - Ro 1:28-29
         c. It is often the result of striving over words - 1Ti 6:3-4
         d. It is typical of our lives prior to salvation - Tit 3:3
         e. But it is part of that which we are to "lay aside" - 1 Pe
            2:1

CONCLUSION

1. "Murders" (KJV, NKJV) is not found in the oldest manuscripts and thus
   omitted in some translations...
   a. Though it certainly is an infraction of the law of love - cf. Ro
      13:9
   b. It is a sin of which even those who hate are guilty - cf. 1Jn 
      3:15

2. Why are such sins included in the works of the flesh...?
   a. Because of what Jesus did on the cross
      1) It is true that He died to reconcile man back to God - cf. 2 Co
         5:18-21
      2) But also to reconcile man back to man in one body! - cf. Ep 2:
         13-16
   b. Because we are to preserve this reconciliation
      1) Not only the "vertical" reconciliation we have with God, which
         we preserve by living holy lives (which is why we must also
         avoid sins of moral impurity)
      2) But also the "horizontal" reconciliation we have with one
         another, which we preserve by maintaining the unity of the
         Spirit in the body of peace - cf. Ep 4:1-3

3. Therefore, infractions of the law of love undo the work of Christ on
   the cross...!
   a. Dare we commit sins of moral impurity to jeopardize our
      reconciliation with God?
   b. Neither should we violate the law of love and jeopardize our
      reconciliation with one another

4. They also prevent us from producing the fruit of the Spirit in our
   lives...
   a. For such sins are certainly contrary to the Spirit - cf. Ga 5:17
   b. Making it impossible for us to enjoy love, joy, peace, etc. - cf.
      Ga 5:22

Our next study will conclude our look at the works of the flesh by
noticing the sins of intemperance...



Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011

From Mark Copeland... The Works Of The Flesh - I (Galatians 5:19-21)



                     "THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS"

                  The Works Of The Flesh - I (5:19-21)

INTRODUCTION

1. Of grave danger to the Christian are the works of the flesh...
   a. They can destroy the liberty we enjoy in Christ - Ga 5:13-15
   b. They prevent us from following the Spirit and doing the things we
      wish - Ga 5:16-17
   c. They keep us from inheriting the kingdom of God - Ga 5:21

2. It is imperative that we know what are the works of the flesh...
   a. Those things that are contrary to the Spirit - Ga 5:17
   b. Those sins which wage war against the soul - cf. 1Pe 2:11

[To aid us in this battle, Paul provides a list of sins that are quite
evident (Ga 5:19-21).  At the top of the list are...]

I. SINS OF MORAL IMPURITY

   A. FORNICATION (Grk., porneia)...
      1. Note:  Some translations begin with 'adultery' which is not
         found in some of the oldest manuscripts; it is certainly
         covered by 'fornication'
      2. Porneia - illicit sexual intercourse - Vine
      3. As used in the New Testament, we find it having at least four
         different applications...
         a. A reference to premarital sex - 1Co 7:1-2
         b. A synonym for adultery - Mt 19:9
         c. A generic term referring to all forms of unchastity - 1Co 6:13,18
         d. A specific sense referring to harlotry and prostitution - Re 2:20-21
      4. It therefore includes any sort of sexual intercourse between
         partners who are not married; e.g., premarital sex, adultery,
         homosexuality, prostitution, incest
      5. God's disdain for such immorality is seen in the fact...
         a. There are seven lists of evil in the writings of Paul
         b. Fornication is listed in five of them, and is the first in
            each of them

   B. UNCLEANNESS (Grk., akatharsia)...
      1. Akatharsia - in a moral sense: the impurity of lustful,
         luxurious, profligate living - Thayer
         a. It originally had reference to dirt or dirtiness in a
            physical sense
         b. In the Greek OT, it is used to denote ritual and ceremonial
            impurity which made it impossible for the worshipper to
            approach God - cf. Lev 22:3-9
         c. It then came to be used in a moral sense, of that moral
            depravity which disgusts the person who sees it
      2. Three ideas are therefore inherent in the word
         a. The quality of that which is soiled and dirty; some minds
            are like that
         b. An impurity where there is a repulsive quality that awakens
            disgust in decent persons
         c. That which separates man from God; in contrast,compareMt 5:8; Re 3:4

   C. LEWDNESS (Grk., aselgia)...
      1. Aselgia - also translated as lasciviousness, licentiousness,
         sensuality
      2. The basic meaning of the word
         a. In the NT it seems to be linked with sexual excess in a
            public way
         b. Barclay distinguishes three characteristics of this sin:
            1) It is wanton and undisciplined action
            2) It has no respect for the persons or rights of anyone
               else
            3) It is completely indifferent to public opinion and to
               public decency
      3. The general idea is one of shameless behavior
         a. Thayer defines this word by giving these examples:
            1) "filthy words"
            2) "indecent bodily movements"
            3) "unchaste handling of males and females"
         b. This word is one that best describes...
            1) What is often seen in much of modern dance, music,
               theater
            2) What goes on at many concerts, and on many talk shows
         c. The context in which it is often found in the Scriptures
            helps to understand this word - cf. Ro 13:11-14; Ep 4:17-19;
            1Pe 4:1-4

[With these three words (porneia, akatharsia, aselgia), we learn that
"the works of the flesh" involve sins of moral impurity.  As we continue
with Paul's list, we note that they also involve...]

II. SINS OF IDOLATRY AND SORCERY

   A. IDOLATRY (Grk., eidololatreia)...
      1. Eidololatreia - image worship - Strong
      2. Concerning idolatry as commonly considered...
         a. In the beginning stages of idolatry, no one worships the
            idol or image itself
            1) The idol simply served two purposes:
               a) To localize the god it represents
               b) To visualize the god it represents
            2) It is simply designed to make it easier to worship the
               god represented by the idol
         b. Inevitably, however, people will wind up worshipping the
            idol or image itself
            1) We see this in various forms of Catholicism
            2) Where the leaders say the image is not an idol, only an
               'icon'
            3) But who can deny that the average worshipper begins to
               view the image itself as something holy and to be
               revered?
            4) Thus that which is 'created' begins receiving adoration
               rightfully due the 'Creator'
         c. According to Ro 1:18-23, the basic error of idol worship is
            the worship of the 'created thing' rather than the 'Creator
            of all things'!
      3. Concerning idolatry as that which displaces God...
         a. Idolatry is not just the adoration or worship of images
         b. Paul defines 'covetousness' as idolatry - Ep 5:5; Col 3:5
            1) Any strong desire for material things that replaces our
               desire for God is a form of idolatry!
               a) Our hearts are such that they are drawn to whatever is
                  our treasure - Mt 6:21
               b) If our treasure is earthly things, our heart
                  (devotion) is drawn away from God
            2) We cannot serve material things and God at the same time!
               - Mt 6:24
         c. Thus we can be idolaters when we make things other than God
            Himself our priority in life, such as:  our job, house,
            hobby, family

   B. SORCERY (Grk., pharmakeia)...
      1. Pharmakeia is found to be used in three ways
         a. Medically, to the use of drugs with no bad meaning at all
         b. The misuse of drugs so as to poison, not cure
         c. The practice of sorcery and witchcraft, which often used
            drugs to cast spells and alter the behavior of others
      2. The practice of witchcraft and sorcery is strongly condemned
         - Exo 22:18; Re 21:8
      3. Examples of this sin today...
         a. There is an increasing number of religions based upon the
            occult, and that make use of drugs in their religion
         b. The "recreational" use of drugs also falls into this
            category
            1) Remember that altering the behavior of others through
               such drugs was a basic function of sorcery and witchcraft
            2) What is the difference between using drugs to alter
               others' behavior and your own?
            3) This is not to discount the proper medicinal use of drugs
            4) But just as the Bible condemns drunkenness, which is an
               altered state brought on by alcohol (a drug), so it would
               seem to condemn similar use of other drugs

CONCLUSION

1. In this study we have seen that the works of the flesh include...
   a. Sins of moral impurity (fornication, uncleanness, lewdness)
   b. The sins of idolatry and sorcery
   -- Our next study will survey sins violating the law of love

2. William Barclay observed that each of these sins is a perversion of
   something good...
   a. Fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness - perversions of the
      sexual instinct which in itself can be a beautiful thing as part
      of true love between a man and a woman
   b. Idolatry - a perversion of worship
   c. Sorcery - a perversion of the proper use of drugs
   -- He also noted:  "The awfulness of the power of sin lies precisely
      in its ability to take the raw material of potential goodness and
      turn it into the material of evil."

3. Because of the power of sin to corrupt, we need divine help to break
   free from its bondage...
   a. Jesus promises freedom from the bondage of sin - Jn 8:31-36
   b. He sent the Holy Spirit to deliver on that promise - Ro 8:12-13;
      Ga 5:16

Have you responded in obedience to the gospel that you might enjoy true
freedom from the corrupting power of sin...? - cf. Ac 2:38-39

xecutable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011