http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=11&article=3782
Laying On of Hands

The
ability to perform miracles in the first century church was granted by
God in essentially two ways: baptism of the Holy Spirit and the laying
on of the apostles’ hands. The Bible only mentions the former avenue as
occurring twice (Acts 2 and Acts 10), and then only for special and
limited purposes, with a third occurrence implied in connection with
Paul’s unique calling (Acts 9:15; 22:21; Romans 1:5; 11:13; 1
Corinthians 15:8; Galatians 1:16; 2:7-8; et al. See Miller, 2003). The
latter avenue is specifically described by Luke in his account of the
initial proclamation of the Gospel to the Samaritans:
Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had
received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, who, when
they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy
Spirit. For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been
baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid hands on them,
and they received the Holy Spirit. And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given,
he offered them money, saying, “Give me this power also, that anyone on
whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit” (Acts 8:14-19, emp.
added).
Since the New Testament expounds no other means by which any person may
receive ability to perform miracles, it inevitably follows that no
person living on Earth today has miraculous capability. Holy Spirit
baptism was unique, exclusive, and limited at the beginning of the
church, and no apostles are alive today to impart miraculous ability to
anyone.
Some have challenged the exclusivity of the role of the apostles in
their unique ability to impart miraculous capability by calling
attention to the admonition given by Paul to Timothy: “Do not neglect
the gift that is in you, which was given to you by prophecy with the
laying on of the hands
of the eldership” (1 Timothy 4:14, emp. added). Based on this verse, some insist that the apostles were not the
only conduit through which God would/will impart miraculous ability. Does the New Testament clarify this situation?
In 2 Timothy 1:6, Paul plainly declared that the “gift of God” which
Timothy possessed was conferred “through the laying on of my hands.” How
does one harmonize 1 Timothy 4:14 with 2 Timothy 1:6? Was Timothy’s
miraculous ability conferred upon him by Paul, by the eldership, or by
both? The grammar of the text provides the answer. In 2 Timothy 1:6,
where Paul claimed sole credit for imparting the gift to Timothy, the
Holy Spirit employed the Greek preposition
dia with the
genitive, which means “through” or “by means of ” (Machen, 1923, p. 41;
Dana and Mantey, 1927, p. 101). However, in 1 Timothy 4:14, where Paul
included the eldership in the action of impartation, he employed a
completely different Greek preposition—
meta. The root meaning of
meta is “in the midst of ” (Dana and Mantey, p. 107). It denotes “the
attendant circumstances of something that takes place”—the “
accompanying
phenomena” (Arndt and Gingrich, 1957, pp. 510-511, emp. added). It
means “in association with” or “accompanied by” (Moule, 1959, p. 61;
Thayer, 1901, p. 404; cf. Robertson, 1934, p. 611). In other words,
Paul—as an apostle—imparted the miraculous gift to Timothy. It came from
God through Paul. However, on that occasion, the local eldership of the
church was present and participated with Paul in the event, lending
their simultaneous support and accompanying commendation. After
examining the grammatical data on the matter, Nicoll concluded: “[I]t
was the imposition of hands by St. Paul that was the instrument used by
God in the communication of the charisma to Timothy” (1900, 4:127; cf.
Jamieson, et al., n.d., 2:414; Williams, 1960, p. 956). Consequently, 1
Timothy 4:14 provides no proof that miraculous capability could be
received through other means in addition to apostolic imposition of
hands and the two clear instances of Holy Spirit baptism.
[NOTE: For a more thorough study of miracles, see "Modern-Day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation—EXTENDED VERSION"]
REFERENCES
Arndt, William and F.W. Gingrich (1957),
A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Dana, H.E. and Julius Mantey (1927),
A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Toronto, Canada: Macmillan).
Jamieson, Robert, A.R. Fausset, and David Brown (no date),
A Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).
Machen, J. Gresham (1923),
New Testament Greek for Beginners (Toronto, Canada: Macmillan).
Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-Day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy
Spirit Baptism: A Refutation—EXTENDED VERSION,”
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=11&article=1399.
Moule, C.F.D. (1959),
An Idiom-Book of New Testament Greek (Cambridge: University Press, 1977 reprint).
Nicoll, W. Robertson, ed. (1900),
The Expositor’s Greek Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
Robertson, A.T. (1934),
A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press).
Thayer, J.H. (1901),
Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1977 reprint).
Williams, George (1960),
The Student’s Commentary on the Holy Scriptures (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel), sixth edition.