http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com/2017/02/a-different-look-at-inquisition-george-l.html
A Different Look at the Inquisition --George L. Faull, Rel. D.
In Zurich Switzerland, on January 18th, 1525 an order was given by the
Zurich Council that all infants must be baptized within 8 days of birth.
Those not compliant to this ruling would be banished from Zurich. On
January 21st, all opponents of this decree were not allowed to meet or
speak in public.
This led to martyrdom and many of those who were martyred were
Anabaptist. An Anabaptist is not speaking of those called Baptists
today. They were a people who were nicknamed “Anabaptist”. This comes
from the Greek which means “over again” and “baptism”. So an Anabaptist
is “One who baptizes again!” They did not consider infant baptism or
sprinkling a recognized baptism, so they did not consider
believer-baptism a rebaptism so they rejected the nickname.
In March of 1525, this order was given: “You know without doubt, and
have heard from many that for a long time, some peculiar men, who
imagine that they are learned, have come forward astonishingly, and
without any evidence of the Holy Scriptures, given as a pretext by
simple and pious men, have preached, and without the permission and
consent of the church, have proclaimed that infant baptism did not
proceed from God, but from the devil, and, therefore, ought not to be
practiced… We, therefore, ordain and require that hereafter all men,
women, boys and girls forsake rebaptism, and shall not make use of it
hereafter, and shall let infants be baptized; whoever shall act contrary
to this public edict shall be fined for every offense, one mark; and IF
ANY BE DISOBEDIENT AND STUBBORN THEY SHALL BE TREATED WITH SEVERITY;
for, the obedient we will protect; the disobedient we will punish
according to his deserts, without fail; by this all are to conduct
themselves. All this we confirm by this public document, stamped with
the seal of our city, and given on St. Andrew’s Day, A. D., 1525.”
RESULTS: Felix Manz, Henry Reiman, Jacob Falk were drowned. December
1527 they were told, “He who immersed shall be immersed”. A townsman
said, “They like immersion, so let us immerse them”.
Balthasar Hobmaier said, “The command is to baptize those who believe,
to baptize those who do not believe, therefore is forbidden. He was
imprisoned and later when he was supposed to recant instead he shouted,
“Infant baptism is not of God and men must be baptized by faith in
Christ. I have never taught Anabaptism…but the right baptism of Christ,
which is preceded by teaching and oral confession of faith, I teach, and
say that infant baptism is a robbery of the right baptism of Christ.”
On March 10th, 1528 in Vienna, he was burned at the stake and 8 days
later, his wife was drowned.
Not only in Zurich and Vienna was this persecution against those who
were for immersion and against infant baptism practiced but at St. Gall,
Switzerland they issued this decree – September 9th, 1527: “In order
that the dangerous, wicked, turbulent and seditious sect of the Baptists
may be eradicated, we have thus decreed: If anyone is suspected of
rebaptism, he is to be warned by the magistracy to leave the territory
under penalty of the designated punishment [to be drowned]. Every person
is obliged to report those favorable to rebaptism. Whoever shall not
comply with this ordinance is liable to punishment according to the
sentence of the magistracy. Teachers of rebaptism, baptizing preachers,
and leaders of hedge meetings ARE TO BE DROWNED. Those previously
released from prison who have sworn to desist from such things, shall
incur the same penalty. Foreign Baptists are to be driven out; if they
return they SHALL BE DROWNED. No one is allowed to secede from the
[Zwinglian] church and to absent himself from the Holy Supper.”
The decree on March 26th , 1530, was even more severe: “All who adhere
to or favor the false sect of the Baptists, and who attend
hedge-meetings, shall suffer the most severe punishments. BAPTIST
LEADERS, THEIR FOLLOWERS, AND PROTECTORS SHALL BE DROWNED WITHOUT MERCY.
Those, however, who "From the cowardice that shrinks from new truth,
from the laziness that is content with halftruths, from the arrogance
that thinks it knows all truth, O, God of Truth, deliver us." Ulrich
Zwingli 2 THE GOSPEL UNASHAMED July 2015 assist them, or fail to report
or to arrest them shall be punished otherwise on body and goods as
injurious and faithless subjects.”
Likewise, the Geneva’s Switzerland council in 1632, hung and burned men
for denying the Trinity. The same persecution was in Dasil and Berne.
In Germany, Luther taught immersion even translating “baptize” as
“dip”. He wrote these words in 1518: “The signification of baptism
demands, for it signifies that the old man and sinful birth from the
flesh and blood shall be completely drowned through the grace of God.
Therefore, a man should sufficiently perform the signification and a
right perfect sign. The sign rests, in this, that a man plunge a person
in water in the name of the Father, etc., but does not leave him therein
but lifts him out again; therefore it is called being lifted out of the
font or depths. And so must all of both of these things be the sign;
the dipping and the lifting out. Thirdly, the signification is a saving
death of the sins and of the resurrection of the grace of God. The
baptism is a bath of the new birth. Also a drowning of the sins in the
baptism” (Luther, Opera Lutheri, I. 319. Folio edition).
He also wrote: “The term baptism is a Greek word; it may be rendered
into Latin by “mersio”: when we immerse anything in water, that it may
be entirely covered with water. And though that custom be quite
abolished among the generality, (for neither do they entirely dip
children, but only sprinkle them with a little water,) nevertheless they
ought to be wholly immersed, and immediately to be drawn out again, for
the etymology of the word seems to require it. The Germans call baptism
“tauf”, from depth, which they call “tief” in their language; as if it
were proper those should be deeply immersed, who are baptized. And
truly, if you consider what baptism signifies that the old man and our
native character that is full of sin, entirely of flesh and blood as it
is, may be overwhelmed by divine grace. The manner of baptism, therefore
ought to answer to the signification of baptism, so that it may show
forth a sign that is certain and full.” – Opera
“When the washing away of sin is attributed to baptism, it is rightly
so attributed; but the meaning of the phrase is too slight and weak to
fully express baptism, which is rather a symbol of death and
resurrection. For this reason I could wish that the baptized should be
totally immersed, according to the meaning of the word and signification
of the mystery; not that I think it necessary to do so, but that it
would be well that so complete and perfect thing as baptism should have
its sign also in completeness and perfection, even as it was doubtless
instituted by Christ.” – Primary Works, p. 192.
Later, Luther began to oppose immersion and those who opposed infant
baptism. Though he was opposed to executing them he wished them all to
be banished for disagreeing with his doctrines. Again, he changed his
mind and encouraged the destruction of peasants who revolted from the
lords seeking their freedom.
He wrote: “The peasants would not listen; they would not let anyone
tell them anything; their ears must be unbuttoned with bullets, till
their heads jump off their shoulders. ... On the obstinate, hardened,
blinded peasants, let no one have mercy, but let everyone, as he is
able, hew, stab, slay, lay about him as though among mad dogs, . . . .
so that peace and safety may be maintained...” [Martin Luther, Werke,
Erlangen edition, vol. 24, p. 294; vol.15, p. 276]
(Over 100,000 peasants died. Do I accuse falsely? - GLF)
He wrote: “It was I, Martin Luther, who slew all the peasants in the
insurrection, for I commanded them to be slaughtered. All their blood is
upon my shoulders. But I cast it on our Lord God who commanded me to
speak in this way.” [Martin Luther, Werke, Erlangen edition, vol. 59, p.
284]
So Luther sought the death of those opposing infant baptism and favored
believers’ immersion. In 1529, the Diet of Speirs all Anabaptists were
condemned to death. Mr. Halley points out 400 special police were hired
to hunt down those believers and execute them on the spot. Thousands
were burned across Europe for their faith. So the Lutherans killed many
of the immersed believers.
Urbanus Rhegius was a Lutheran who wrote a book in 1528 showing a river
running into the ocean of water that was on fire. This was the view of
Switzerland and Germany that immersion led to hell.
Banishment, death, burnings, hangings, torturing, branding, and imprisonment was their fate.
Likewise, Calvin was a persecutor and a murderer. “So entirely was he
in favour of persecuting measures, that he wrote a treatise in defence
of them, maintaining the lawfulness of putting heretics to death; and he
reduced these rigid theories to practice, in his conduct towards
Castellio, Jerom Bolsee, and Servetus, whose fates are too generally
known to require being here repeated. At the council of Geneva, 1632,
Nicholas Anthoine was condemned to be first hanged and then burned for
opposing the doctrine of the Trinity...” (J.J. Stockdale, The History of
the Inquisitions, 1810, p. xxviii). Martin Luther John Calvin July 2015
THE GOSPEL UNASHAMED 3 In the days of King Edward VI of England, Calvin
wrote a letter to Lord Protector Somerset and urged him to put
Anabaptists to death: “These altogether deserve to be well punished by
the sword, seeing that they do conspire against God, who had set him in
his royal seat” (John Christian, A History of the Baptists, Vol. 1,
chap. 15).
Historian John Christian observes that Calvin “was responsible in a
large measure for the demon of hate and fierce hostility which the
Baptists of England had to encounter.”
In October 1563, Calvin had Servetus killed, burned at the stake for
disagreeing on the Trinity. It was approved by both Melanchthon of
Germany and Bullinger of Geneva and other leading reformers. Some of the
worst persecutions were done by the Calvinists against the Arminians.
Some were beheaded, imprisoned, or banished. Likewise, the Church of
England under King Henry VIII, as well as King Edward VI and King James,
persecuted immersionists. They organized burnings. These included both
men and women. Many of their names are recorded in history but all in
God’s book of martyrs. Hangings were common as well persecutions and
imprisonments which continued over several centuries.
Why do I print this? It shows that it is not only the Muslims and
Catholics that kill their opponents. The reformers also persecuted those
who insisted on immersion and other Bible truths. The very founders of
Protestantism were also butchers filled with murderous practices on
those who disagreed with their doctrines.
The Legacy of Zwingli today - He was the one responsible for calling
baptism a work and establish the “faith only” doctrine we contend with
to this day.
As for John Calvin, the founder of Calvinism, predestination is still
taught in many mainline churches and was the cause of the death of many
believers in Christ. Yet he did not predestinate the murders.
Martin Luther by his own mouth caused the deaths of many in Germany and
Prussia. His hatred and persecution of Jews is also renowned. The
Church of England likewise took their toll on religious freedom.
Ironically, these men had been greatly persecuted by the Roman Catholic
Church. However, where they established themselves elsewhere in
Switzerland, Germany, England, etc., they motivated other countries to
prosecute and persecute. The persecuted became the persecutors. Romans
11:16 says, “If the root is holy, so are the branches.” Is not the
opposite true? “If the root is unholy, can the branches be holy?”
Isn’t it strange and ironic that the adherents to these men’s heritage
now are saying that the mode, purpose, and candidates for baptism is
simply immaterial? The rotting corpses of hundreds of thousands whom
their ancestors tortured and slew over these questions gave their lives
for believers’ immersion. Christ never intended His Kingdom to be spread
by force. Those who do so prove they are none of His. It was at the
price of the martyrs’ blood that we have the freedom today to preach
believers baptism. Truly many of our own brethren lack the courage in
this free society to preach the necessity of believer’s baptism.
Today, if we teach what the restoration fathers taught in rejecting the
reformer’s teachings, both would be counted worthy of martyrdom by the
founding reformers. The tolerance many brothers show toward the doctrine
of the founding reformers to me is astounding. To teach the faith-only
doctrine of Zwingli, the doctrine of election of Calvin, and the
non-necessity of immersion of Luther as practiced now by many in the
Church of Christ, denies not only the teaching of Jesus Christ but is a
rejection of our heritage. It cheapens and tramples the blood of Christ
and the blood of the martyrs. It makes the martyrs radical legalists who
simply died on the wrong hill.
(This article was collected from many sources. We especially are thankful for the writings of David Cloud.)
