http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-millennium-is-not.html
THE "MILLENNIUM" IS NOT . . .
by David Vaughn Elliott
The very thought of
a thousand-year reign of Christ excites the imagination. Usually this
period is termed "the millennium" from the Latin meaning "one thousand
years." This much-talked-about thousand years, or millennium, is named
only six times in Scripture. Moreover, all six times are in the same
text: Revelation 20:1-7. With such scant mention in the Bible, students
should be very careful in trying to reach a conclusion regarding the
meaning of this period of time.
WHAT REVELATION 20:1-7 DOES NOT SAY
Before examining what Revelation 20 does say, it is very enlightening to notice what it does not say:
1 - It does not say where Christ is during this period, whether in heaven or on earth.
2 - It does not say where the martyrs are during this period.
3 - Although it does mention "the first resurrection" and "the second death," it does not mention "the second resurrection."
4 - It does not say that Satan is powerless during the thousand years.
5 - It does not say that the thousand years is a period of great peace with no persecution.
6 - It does not even mention the Jews, Jerusalem or any temple.
7 - It does not say that everyone on earth is in subjection to Christ during the thousand years.
8 - It does not offer any "second opportunity" for salvation.
9 - It does not say that the "reign" is a physical, earthly one, like David's reign.
There is so much that Revelation 20 does not say, one wonders where
all the ideas about "the millennium" come from. The reply is simple:
they come by connecting other texts to Revelation 20 (not to mention the
addition of ideas that are not found anywhere in the Bible). However,
before proceeding to other texts, there are further considerations to
keep in mind.
NO ONE INTERPRETS IT ALL LITERALLY
The claim is made that the "thousand" years, and what is connected to
the thousand years, must be understood literally. However, the text is
admittedly filled with symbols, thereby placing in question a literal
interpretation of those parts of the text that are not as clear.
No one understands that the dragon/serpent is literal. In fact, the
book itself very specifically and very clearly says otherwise. In both
20:2 and 12:9, the inspired writer says that the dragon, the "serpent of
old" is Satan, the Devil.
No one understands "the beast" mentioned in 20:4 as a literal
four-legged animal. The reference, of course, is to chapter 13, which in
turn is based on Daniel 7. Daniel 7:23 says, "The fourth beast shall be
a fourth kingdom on earth." Most interpreters recognize that the beast
represents Rome at some time in history. Even those who do not apply it
to Rome understand that the beast is a symbol of some anti-Christian
power.
Then there is the chain, the key and the seal. Does anyone see them
as literal? Is not Satan a spirit being, albeit an evil spirit? Can a
physical chain bind an evil spirit? Would a literal, physical seal be
any deterrent to him?
The book of Revelation is a highly symbolical book. Jesus himself
explains that the seven lampstands are the seven churches and the seven
stars are the angels of the seven churches (1:20). Whether one
understands "angels" here as heavenly beings or earthly "messengers,"
Jesus confirms what is seen in other Bible prophecies--namely, that
stars in prophecy often represent outstanding individuals, just like
"Olympic stars" today.
Symbols continue throughout Revelation to the very last chapter,
where Jesus calls himself "the Bright and Morning Star" (22:16). The
next verse speaks of "the bride," a reference to Christ's church. With
all this figurative language throughout the book and in chapter 20
itself, there is no inherent necessity that other elements in the
chapter be interpreted literally.
"THOUSAND" IN THE BIBLE
English dictionaries give these definitions for "thousand": "a very
large number," "a great number or amount." This use is very common in
our daily language. Mom says, "I told you a thousand times to clean up
your room." Or consider the "Thousand Islands" in the Saint Lawrence
River, which include more than 1,500 islands.
There are several prophecies in Daniel and Revelation with numerical
values: 3 1/2, 42, 62, 69, 1260, 1290, 1335. Such numbers are quite
definite and specific. The number "1,000," however, is a very "round
number," frequently used to express an indefinitely large amount,
whether in English, or Spanish or Russian--or in the Bible.
In Deuteronomy 1:11, Moses expresses to Israel: "May the LORD God of
your fathers make you a thousand times more numerous than you are."
Israel at that time consisted of 600,000 men of war, not counting women
and children. A very conservative estimate would be that, with women and
children, they totaled two million. A thousand times two million is two
billion! Was Moses literally wishing they would number two billion? Or
was he simply using "thousand" like we often do?
In Psalms 50:10, God says: "Every beast of the forest [is] Mine,
[And] the cattle on a thousand hills." How about the rest of the hills?
Would anyone dare limit God's ownership to a strict 1,000 count?
Certainly not.
Consider also Psalm 105:8,9: "He remembers His covenant [to Abraham]
forever, The word [which] He commanded, for a thousand generations." A
generation is the average span of time between the birth of parents and
the birth of their offspring, about 30 years. A thousand generations
would be 30,000 years! Literally, the text says that God commanded (or
remembers) His covenant for 30,000 years. But wait. There are no
"generations" in eternity. Thus, if we force 1,000 here to be an exact
number, the world must continue for 30,000 years from the time of
Abraham, which is 26,000 years into our future. Unless you can accept
that Jesus will not return for 26,000 years, you are forced to
understand "thousand" in Psalm 105 as an unspecified large number.
In short, in the Bible, just as in common-every-day English, 1,000 is
often used as an indefinitely large number. There is no reason why the
same cannot be true in Revelation 20.
OTHER SCRIPTURE MUST BE STUDIED
From all the above, it is very clear that Revelation 20:1-7 cannot
possibly be understood by itself. It raises too many questions.
Everyone's explanation is based more on other Scriptures than on
Revelation 20 itself.
There are at least two major views of the matter. On the one hand,
there are those who connect "the millennium" to all the Old Testament
kingdom prophecies. They say that Jesus did not fulfill those prophecies
at His first coming. They say that because the Jews rejected the
kingdom, Jesus had to postpone the kingdom's arrival. They believe in a
literal future one-thousand-year reign, in which all the Old Testament
prophecies will be literally fulfilled via an earthly kingdom centering
around Israel, Jerusalem and a rebuilt temple.
On the other hand, there are those who also say that the "thousand
years" is the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies of the
kingdom. However, they say that those prophecies are not something yet
to be fulfilled in our future. They say that Jesus was not a
failure--that He accomplished the work He came on earth to do. They say
that God set up His kingdom on schedule just as Daniel and Jesus had
prophesied. They say the kingdom of God is not a physical kingdom, nor a
Jewish kingdom. They say the kingdom is spiritual, it is for Jew and
Gentile alike and it is here now. They say that the expression "a
thousand years" is a general term expressing an indefinitely long period
of time.
It is clear that a person's understanding of "the millennium" is very
much influenced by his understanding of the kingdom prophecies and
their fulfillment. That is why the present Insight is not the first, but
rather the sixth, in a series. A consideration of many facts about the
kingdom, as examined in five previous long Insights, is absolutely
necessary as a prerequisite to delving into something as difficult as
Revelation 20.
TWO FUTURE RESURRECTIONS?
WHAT DID JESUS SAY?
A superficial glance at Revelation 20 would appear to uphold the idea
that there are two future resurrections, separated by one thousand
years. It seems to say that there will be a "first resurrection," that
of the righteous, before the thousand years, followed by a "second
resurrection," that of the wicked, after the thousand years.
Such a concept, however, does not harmonize with Jesus' teaching on
the subject. For example, Jesus taught that on "the last day," the
righteous will be raised from the dead and the wicked will be judged. It
will be the end. There is no room in Jesus' "last day" teaching for one
thousand years to follow the resurrection of the righteous. Likewise,
in the parable of the tares, Jesus clearly taught that saints and
sinners must live together in this world until the end. Not only so, but
He adds, "First gather together the tares." There is no way to
harmonize this parable with the concept of taking the wheat out first,
allowing the tares to continue in the world after that. (For greater
detail on Jesus' teaching regarding "the last day" and the parable of
the tares, see Insight #78: "The Rapture.")
The Judgment,
as taught by Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46, leaves no room for two
resurrections separated by a thousand-year reign. Verses 31 and 32
clearly identify the time of the judgment as taking place when Christ
returns: "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy
angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the
nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from
another, as a shepherd divides [his] sheep from the goats." This
judgment pronounces who will enter the kingdom (in its future phase) and
who will not. "Then the King will say to those on His right hand,
'Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you
from the foundation of the world'... Then He will also say to those on
the left hand, 'Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire
prepared for the devil and his angels' " (verses 34,41).
What did Jesus mean by "inherit the kingdom"? Not a mere thousand
years. Listen to His final words regarding both goats and sheep: "These
will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal
life" (verse 46). No millennium here. According to Jesus, the judgment
is followed by eternity. According to Jesus, the future phase of the
kingdom is equated to "eternal life."
A RECOGNITION OF WHAT JESUS SAID
In the January, 1999, issue of "Midnight Call," Norbert Lieth offered
an amazing admission of what has just been said. Discussing the writing
of 1 Thessalonians 4, he says, "Until then, the doctrine of the first
resurrection had been a mystery. It wasn't taught in the Old Testament,
nor in the Gospels." Referring to the writing of 1 Thessalonians and 1
Corinthians, he says, "Only in them was the mystery of the Rapture
revealed (1st Corinthians 15:51-53). Until then, it was believed that
the resurrection of all the dead would take place on the last day
(Daniel 12:2 and 13, John 5:25-29 and 11:24)." Mr. Lieth thus admits
Jesus taught "the resurrection of all the dead would take place on the
last day"!
According to the "Midnight Call," the Rapture was a new doctrine
revealed 20 or more years after Jesus' ascension. There is no inherent
problem with that--the Spirit was leading the apostles into all truth
(John 16:12,13). The problem is that the supposed new revelation
contradicts the clear teaching of Jesus. Mr. Lieth admits the
contradiction. He admits that Jesus taught the opposite of two future
resurrections. When Mr. Lieth says, "it was believed," according to his
own context, he is saying, "Jesus believed." In other words, Jesus did
not believe Mr. Lieth's doctrine.
It is plain for all to see that Jesus' doctrine says all the dead will
be resurrected the same time, on "the last day." Therefore, the doctrine
of two future resurrections, separated by "the millennium," is a
doctrine that opposes the clear teaching of our Lord and Savior Jesus
Christ.
THE KINGDOM IN REVELATION
Previous Insights offered detailed evidence of the existence of the
kingdom of God in the first century A.D.--evidence in the four Gospels,
in the book of Acts and in the epistles of Peter and Paul. Now it is
time to examine the book of Revelation, outside of chapter 20.
In the opening verses of the book (1:9), John says: "I, John, both
your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience
of Jesus Christ." John was already "in the tribulation"! John was
already "in the kingdom"!
In 1:5,6, John speaks of "Jesus Christ... who loved us and washed us
from our sins in His own blood, and has made us kings and priests to His
God and Father." Some Greek manuscripts read "kings" while others read
"kingdom." There is little difference in ultimate meaning. Revelation
20:6 says, "they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign
with Him a thousand years." "Priests and reign." That is practically a
repeat of 1:6 "kingdom and priests" or "kings and priests." Moreover,
1:6 reads, "has made us." That is past tense. It expresses an
accomplished fact, a present reality. We are reigning now!
Revelation 2:11 promises, "He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the
second death." Avoiding the second death is thus a blessing for all
faithful Christians. Therefore, Revelation 20:6 is neither stating a new
truth nor a truth reserved for a special group of Christians when it
says, "Blessed and holy [is] he who has part in the first resurrection.
Over such the second death has no power." This is speaking of all
Christians.
Verse 1:5 also says, "Jesus Christ... the ruler over the kings of the
earth." Jesus is ruler now! We all know what type of ruler He is: a
King. Jesus is king now! In 3:21, Jesus says of himself, "I also
overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne." Jesus is on the
throne now! Under the seventh trumpet (11:15), there are "loud voices in
heaven, saying, 'The kingdoms of this world have become [the]
[kingdoms] of our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall reign forever and
ever!" Whatever historical date one places on the fulfillment of the
seventh trumpet, notice that Jesus' reign is "forever and ever." It is
eternal, as Daniel 2:44 prophesied. Any interpretation of Revelation 20
that limits the kingdom of God and Christ to one thousand years is
simply not in harmony with the rest of Scripture.
RELATIONSHIP OF CHAPTERS 12 AND 20
Revelation 12, regarding the woman, the dragon, the male child and
war in heaven, is not without its difficulties; but consider verses 10
and 11:
"Then I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, 'Now salvation, and
strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of His Christ have
come, for the accuser of our brethren, who accused them before our God
day and night, has been cast down. And they overcame him by the blood of
the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, and they did not love
their lives to the death.' "
First, note that salvation and the kingdom arrive at the same
time--at the time Satan is "cast down" out of heaven. What is the
earliest possible point in history for the arrival of salvation and the
kingdom of God? Verse 11 says that the war was won "by the blood of the
Lamb." So all of this must necessarily have taken place after Calvary.
A more difficult question: what is the latest possible point in
history for the arrival of salvation, the kingdom and the casting down
of Satan? Verses 13 and 14 say that, after Satan was cast to the earth,
he persecuted the woman and she fled into the wilderness, where she
remained for "time and times and half a time." Therefore, salvation and
the kingdom had to arrive some time before the persecution of the woman
for "time and times and half a time."
It is generally understood by all that the "time and times and half a
time" is a reference to 3 1/2 years, or 1260 days as stated in 12:6.
Whether this is 1260 literal days, or a figurative day-for-a-year
interpretation, is a question for another study.
The prevailing view among futurists is that the 3 1/2 prophetic years
refers to the second half of "the tribulation," which is followed by
the arrival of the kingdom in "the millennium." However, this does not
agree with Revelation 12. Revelation 12 says that at the moment Satan is
cast out of heaven, a loud voice in heaven declares, "Now salvation...
and the kingdom of our God... have come." The persecution of the woman
for 3 1/2 years comes after Satan is cast down, thus after the arrival
of the kingdom. Futurists, however, teach that the 3 1/2 years take
place before the arrival of the kingdom in "the millennium." Such an
interpretation of Revelation 20, that places the 3 1/2 years before the
arrival of the kingdom cannot harmonize with Revelation 12.
Chapter 12 clearly points to three events as simultaneous: the
casting down of Satan, the arrival of salvation and the arrival of the
kingdom. If the kingdom is not here yet, then salvation is not here yet.
By the same token, if salvation is here now, the kingdom is here now!
All this agrees exactly with what John had already affirmed in 1:9: "I,
John, both your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom."
John, in 95 A.D. declared that he was already in the kingdom.
THE MILLENNIUM IS NOT...
Most of the beliefs that anyone has about "the millennium" are not
based on Revelation 20. Beliefs about the millennium are derived from
other sources.
Based on other Scripture, it has been shown that:
1
- The millennium is not a period of time between the bodily
resurrection of the righteous and the bodily resurrection of the
wicked.
2
- The millennium is not a yet future arrival of Jesus' kingdom in which
he will fulfill what He failed to fulfill when He first came.
3 - The millennium is not some time yet future when Jesus for the first time will sit on His throne and reign as King.
4 - The millennium is not a period of time that will arrive 2,000 years after salvation arrived in the world.
What then is the millennium of Revelation 20? Future long Insights,
Lord willing, will explore how the expressions of Revelation 20 can be
harmonized with the rest of the New Testament. In particular, there will
be a study on what the rest of the New Testament teaches about the
first resurrection and another study on what it teaches about the
binding of Satan.
(Scripture
in the preceding article is taken from the New King James Version.
Copyright (c) 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights
reserved.)