https://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=3751
Human Knowledge of Ice, Still Frozen
| by | Kyle Butt, M.Div. |
Many modern scientists who have jettisoned belief in a divine Creator
like to pretend that “science” has it all figured out. We are told that
modern scientific methods are able to tell us how the Universe
spontaneously popped out of nothing and what happened 10-43
seconds after the initial Big Bang. Furthermore, we are informed that
modern science adequately and eloquently has documented the transition
of a single-celled life form into the complex organism known as man. In
addition, we are told that there is no need for a belief in God, because
humans have figured out everything important or are on their way to
solving the last of the Universe’s unsolved mysteries.
Anyone familiar with true science knows, however, that such grandiose
claims ring as hollow as a drum. Not only have atheistic, evolutionary
scientists failed to offer reasonable ideas concerning the origin of the
Universe and biological life, but human knowledge of some of the most
basic structures remains extremely limited, to say the least.
Take ice formation, for instance. Humans have been interacting with ice
and snow for thousands of years. Yet, for all the time humans have been
studying the stuff, we know precious little about its formation.
Science writer Margaret Wertheim admitted: “In an age when we have
discovered the origin of the universe and observed the warping of space
and time, it is shocking to hear that scientists do not understand
something as seemingly paltry as the format of ice crystals. But that is
indeed the case” (2006, p. 177). While Weytheim is wrong about science
discovering the origin of the Universe (people for millennia have known
the true origin of the Cosmos to be God), she is right that human
ignorance glares at us through the simple structure of an ice crystal.
How can humans claim to know so much, and claim to be at the pinnacle
of all knowledge, intellect, and wisdom, and yet not be able to explain
how something as seemingly simple as ice forms? As God told the prophet
Jeremiah, “If you have run with the footmen, and they have wearied you,
then how can you contend with horses?” (12:5).
When Job questioned God’s care, God condescended to speak with the
suffering patriarch. Yet God’s answers were nothing Job expected to
hear. God did not begin by offering a reasoned defense of why He was
allowing Satan to torment Job. Instead, God asked Job questions that
exhibited Job’s ignorance and pathetic frailty. He asked Job where Job
was when God “laid the foundations of the earth” (38:4). God further
queried if Job could bind the constellations together, or control rain
and weather (38: 31-35). In the middle of God’s inquisition, He asked
Job: “From whose womb comes the ice? And the frost of heaven, who gives
it birth? The waters harden like stone, and the surface of the deep is
frozen” (38:29-30). God was asking Job if he understood ice and its
formation. Job’s answer to God’s interrogation shows his honest heart.
He said to God: “Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me, which I did not know” (42:3).
Would to God that our modern, “enlightened” generation of thinkers
would recognize that, just as Job, we still cannot explain even some of
the most “paltry” physical reactions as the formation of ice crystals.
That being the case, the only correct inference from such is to conclude
that the Intelligence that created ice and initiated the laws of its
formation is vastly superior in every way to human intelligence.
Margaret Wertheim is an evolutionist, but she was forced to concede:
“Though they melt on your tongue, each tiny crystal of ice encapsulates a
universe whose basic rules we have barely begun to discern.” All rules
and laws demand the presence of a lawgiver, and the humble snowflake
manifests the fact that our Universe’s Lawgiver has thoughts that are
supremely higher than human thoughts, and ways that are higher than
man’s ways (Isaiah 55:9).
REFERENCE
Wertheim, Margaret (2006), What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today’s Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty, ed. John Brockman (New York: Harper).