7/22/20

"THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW" Greater Than John The Baptist? (11:11) by Mark Copeland

"THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW"

Greater Than John The Baptist? (11:11)

INTRODUCTION

1. At the height of His earthly ministry, Jesus was approached by two
   disciples of John the Baptist - Mt 11:1-6
   a. John was in prison, and had sent the two disciples to Jesus
   b. Perhaps troubled by his own imprisonment, he wanted affirmation
      that Jesus was indeed the Messiah, the Coming One
   c. Jesus pointed to His works, and spoke of the blessedness of those
      not offended because of Him

2. Jesus used this opportunity to tell the multitudes about John the Baptist - Mt 11:7-10
   a. That he was not some easily shaken reed or man in soft clothing, but a prophet
   b. Indeed, he was the prophet foretold by Isaiah and Malachi - Isa 40:3; Mal 3:1; 4:5

3. But then Jesus made two remarkable statements - Mt 11:11
   a. First, that no one had been greater than John the Baptist
   b. Second, that one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he!

4. It is the second statement that has perplexed many...
   a. For the kingdom of heaven is the church that was about to be established
   b. And in the church there are many people who do not seem to measure up to a man
 like John the Baptist! -- How can any of us be greater than he? [When we know the answer, it should fill us with humility and gratitude, and encourage us to
greater dedication in our service to the Lord. Before we consider the answer, let's review...] I. THE GREATNESS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST A. HE WAS GREAT AS A MAN... 1. Enduring a life of austerity, with voluntary simplicity - Lk 1:80; Mt 3:4 2. He showed courage before king Herod, condemning his unlawful marriage - Mt 14:3-4 3. He possessed humility, showing deference at the height of his own ministry to a New Comer - Jn 1:19-37; 3:22-30 B. HE WAS GREAT AS A PROPHET... 1. His influence brought people throughout Judea into the desert - Mt 3:1-2,5 2. They were moved to be baptized and confess their sins - Mt 6:6 3. Yet He did not weaken his message to accommodate his audience - Mt 6:7-8 C. HE WAS GREAT IN PREPARING THE WAY FOR CHRIST... 1. Such was his particular mission - Mt 3:3; 11:9-10 2. And when Jesus came, he pointed people to Him - Jn 1:29,34-36;3:30,36 a. "Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!" b. "I have seen and testified that this is the Son of God." c. "He must increase, but I must decrease." d. "He who believes in the Son has everlasting life..." [In light of his mission, and the faithful manner in which he carried it out, no one had arisen greater than John (not even Moses, Elijah, etc., though they might be consider "as great as" John). But again, Jesus says that the least in the kingdom is "greater" than Johhn. How can that be...?] II. THE GREATNESS OF THOSE IN THE KINGDOM A. WE ENJOY GREATER KNOWLEDGE OF CHRIST... 1. John's limited knowledge of Christ is implied by his question - Mt 11:2-3 a. He had not seen what Jesus' disciples had seen b. He had not heard what Jesus' disciples had heard - cf. Mt 13:16-17 2. Through the further teaching of Christ and His apostles... a. We know the wonderful story of the cross! b. We know the nature of the kingdom, its establishment, its future glory! c. We know "many things" which even Jesus Himself had not taught His apostles until after the Holy Spirit was sent! - cf. Jn 16:12-13 -- Even "he who is least in the kingdom" knows things about Jesus and His church that John did not know! B. WE ENJOY A GREATER STATION IN THIS LIFE... 1. John was not in the kingdom of heaven (or church) during his life a. He proclaimed it was "at hand" - Mt 3:1-2 b. Jesus and His apostles were still preaching it as being "at hand" - Mt 10:7 c. Jesus would later speak of building His church - Mt 16:18 2. But with the establishment of the church, those who are in it... a. Have been translated into the kingdom of God's Son - Co 1:13; cf. Re 1:9 b. Have been made a royal priesthood and holy nation - 1 Pe 2:9 -- John lived under the Old Covenant; even "he who is least in the kingdom" lives under the New Covenant with its better sacrifice, hope,
and promises - He 7:9; 8:6 C. WE ENJOY GREATER PRIVILEGES... 1. John certainly enjoyed wonderful privileges a. He was filled with the Spirit from his mother's womb - Lk 1:15 b. Who certainly helped him fulfill his mission 2. But Jesus offers things which John did not have; e.g... a. A gift (or measure) of the Spirit that was not given until after Jesus was glorified - Jn 7:37-39 1) Something other than inspiration or miraculous powers, for many had enjoyed that before Jesus was glorified (ascended to heaven) 2) Because of the outpouring of the Spirit on Pentecost, all who are saved have experienced "the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit" - Tit 3:5-7 3) John was born of woman, but those in the kingdom are "born of the Spirit"! - cf. Jn 3:5 a) We therefore receive "the gift of the Spirit" - Ac 2:38 b) A gift that helps deliver one from the power of sin - cf. Ro 8:11-13 c) A gift not enjoyed by those under the Old Covenant - cf. Ro 7:14-8:4 b. The fellowship of the church, the body of Christ - Ro 12:5 1) Remember that John spent his life in the desert, and then in prison 2) He did not enjoy the blessings of fellowship available to the "least" in the kingdom 3) As promised by Jesus, we have a "hundred-fold" family members in this life, something John never had - Mk 10:28-30 -- Many other privileges peculiar to the New Covenant could be mentioned, all of which are enjoyed today by "he who is least in the kingdom"! CONCLUSION 1. In at least three ways, then, we are "greater" than John the Baptist... a. In our knowledge of Jesus Christ b. In our station of life by being in Christ c. In our privileges offered by Jesus Christ 2. As per J. W. McGarvey: "We find from this passage that all true greatness arises from association, relation and contact with Jesus Christ" (The Fourfold Gospel) a. As the forerunner of Christ, John was as great as any other teacher, prophet, priest, lawgiver, and king b. As the beneficiaries of Christ, even the least of those in His kingdom are greater than he 3. Should this not fill us with humility, gratitude, and a desire to greater service? a. That Jesus would bestow such great blessings upon us? b. That we ought to be more dedicated in our service to Christ? 1) Producing the fruit of the Spirit in our lives 2) Nurturing and enjoying the fellowship of the family of God 3) Proclaiming the gospel of Christ and the kingdom in its fullness If John was so faithful in that which is less, should we not be more diligent when we have that which is more? "For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more." (Lk 12:48)


Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2016

eXTReMe Tracker

Pluralism, Multiculturalism, Syncretism, and America by Dave Miller, Ph.D.

http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=11&article=1260

Pluralism, Multiculturalism, Syncretism, and America

by  Dave Miller, Ph.D.

As America continues her downward spiral into social, moral, ethical, and spiritual chaos, it is difficult to realize that the first 150 years of American civilization stand in such stark contrast to current culture. The Christian orientation of this country from its inception is irrefutable, revisionist history notwithstanding. The present extensive transformation of society, and the wholesale abandonment of biblical principles, are astonishing. If the Founding Fathers could be resurrected momentarily to observe the change, they would be unquestionably incredulous. They would be aghast, horrified, and deeply saddened that America could be so thoroughly redirected toward moral degradation—a condition that characterized the France of their day.

Pluralism is the notion that all religious belief systems and philosophies are of equal validity. Multiculturalism is the idea that American culture has historically been neither superior to nor preferable over any other culture in the world, and that all cultures—regardless of basic religious, moral, ethical, and spiritual beliefs and practices—are equally credible, viable representations of proper behavior and living. Multiculturalism actually denigrates American civilization as inferior to the other cultures of the world, demonizing it as oppressive, coercive, and exploitive. For both multiculturalism and pluralism, absolute truth does not exist. Both systems embrace the self-contradictory notion that truth is relative, and that right and wrong depend upon the subjective assessments of fallible humans. The politically correct climate that has been forged, insists that whatever people choose to believe is, indeed, correct and good—at least for them!

One illustration of the mad rush to dilute truth and to advocate the mindless acceptance of every imaginable belief or practice is the recent Interfaith Congress held at the Paul VI Pastoral Center in Fatima, Portugal, site of the Catholic shrine dedicated to “the Blessed Virgin Mary.” Attended by delegates representing many religions, including Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and African Paganism, the Shrine’s rector, Monsignor Luciano Guerra, spoke of the need to create a shrine where different religions can mingle—a “universalistic place of vocation” (“Fatima,” 2003). Jesuit theologian Jacques Dupuis insisted that the religions of the world must unite: “The religion of the future will be a general converging of religions in a universal Christ that will satisfy all” (“Fatima”). Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald, President of the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, spoke of the Shrine’s “inter-religious dimension” (“Vatican,” 2003).

Dupuis argued: “The other religious traditions in the world are part of God’s plan for humanity and the Holy Spirit is operating and present in Buddhist, Hindu and other sacred writings of Christian and non-Christian faiths as well” (“Fatima”). The Congress issued an official statement that urged all religions to refrain from proselytizing those of other religions, since “no one religion can irradiate another or strengthen itself by downplaying others. What is needed is that each religiontreat each [other] religion on the same footing of equality with no inferior or superiority complexes (“Fatima”). The statement emphasized the idea that peace may be achieved among all religions—if everyone will admit that contradictions exist between beliefs, and then concentrate on what unites them rather than what separates them.

History repeats itself over and over again. Stubborn humanity refuses to learn from the mistakes of the past. The Israelites were plagued by syncretism [the fusion of differing systems of belief, as opposed to remaining individualistic] through much of their Old Testament history. They did not remove God completely from their lives. They did not become outright atheistic (although polytheism amounts to the same thing). Rather, they engaged in syncretism and, as a result, mixed many elements of false religion into their own beliefs and practices. During the dark ages of the judges, a man named Micah was typical of the spiritual climate of the day. He had a shrine dedicated to the gods of the pagan nations, but he also latched on to a Levite in hopes of currying the favor of the one true God as well (Judges 17:5-13). The condition of the northern kingdom of Israel at the time of the Assyrian captivity was one in which “[t]hey feared the Lord, yet served their own gods” (2 Kings 17:33). By Zephaniah’s day, the same conditions prevailed. God pronounced judgment on Judah in the following words: “I will stretch out My hand against Judah, and against all the inhabitants of Jerusalem. I will cut off every trace of Baal from this place, the names of the idolatrous and pagan priests—those who worship the host of heaven on the housetops; those who worship and swear oaths by the Lord, but who also swear by Molech” (Zephaniah 1:4-5).

Precisely the same malady is afflicting America. Many Americans still claim to believe in the God of the Bible (although the number is declining year by year). However, many—perhaps most—have bought into the idea that we must not be “judgmental” or “intolerant” of the beliefs of others. Hence, our society is swiftly becoming a strange mixture of every sort of religious belief and practice. People in high places are calling upon nationwide acceptance of all religions without reservation—from Native American animism to Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism. Most shocking of all is the way that so many Americans have simply chosen to embrace a nebulous blend of ambiguous New Age beliefs that enables them to embrace diversity without consideration of specific differences in belief and practice. Spiritual ambiguity has become the sum and substance of religion for many.

It is interesting—if not sadly tragic—that although Israel was born in monotheism in 1500 B.C., it degenerated into paganism, polytheism, and idolatry. America, too, was born in monotheism—the God of the Bible, not Allah or the gods of Hinduism or Buddhism. But her citizenry is now moving full swing into raw paganism. The gods of sensualism and ethical relativity have become the focus of attention for large numbers of Americans. Sensible people have looked back over the centuries and recognized that any country or culture that worships physical things, or attributes divinity to anyone or anything except the one true God, is a country that is ignorant, superstitious, and unenlightened. Who would ever have dreamed that America would one day turn into just such a country? Israel returned to monotheism by the time of Christ—but only after years of suffering and tribulation as a consequence of their national sin. Will America survive the present mad rush away from God? History shows—probably not. The nation likely will face severe punishment in a variety of forms. Oh, that Americans in large numbers would heed the advice of God given to Solomon—a prescription for national health and well-being: “[I]f My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14).

REFERENCES

“Fatima to Become Interfaith Shrine” (2003), The Portugal News, November 1, [On-line], URL: http://the-news.net/cgi-local/story.pl?title=Fatima to become interfaith shrine &edition=all.

“Vatican Denies Fatima Will Become Interfaith Shrine” (2003), The Portugal News, November 29, [On-line], URL: http://the-news.net/cgi-local/story.pl?title=Vatican denies Fatima will become interfaith shrine&edition=all.

Philemon and Slavery by Dave Miller, Ph.D.

http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=11&article=560

Philemon and Slavery

by  Dave Miller, Ph.D.

American abolitionist, editor, orator, author, statesman, and reformer, Frederick Douglass, himself a former slave, was invited to deliver a speech in 1852 (eight years before the Civil War) to a women’s anti-slavery society in Rochester, New York. His assigned subject? “What, to the Slave, is the Fourth of July?” His remarks demonstrate forcefully that the Bible and the Christian religion were not to be blamed for the existence or perpetuation of slavery. In his brilliant oration, Douglass demonstrated that those “Christians” and churches in America at the time that used the Bible to sanction slavery were misinterpreting and misrepresenting it. He stated:

But the church of this country is not only indifferent to the wrongs of the slave, it actually takes sides with the oppressors. It has made itself the bulwark of American slavery, and the shield of American slave-hunters. Many of its most eloquent Divines [preachers—DM], who stand as the very lights of the church, have shamelessly given the sanction of religion and the Bible to the whole slave system. They have taught that man may, properly, be a slave; that the relation of master and slave is ordained of God; that to send back an escaped bondman to his master is clearly the duty of all the followers of the Lord Jesus Christ; and this horrible blasphemy is palmed off upon the world for Christianity.... Fellow-citizens! I will not enlarge further on your national inconsistencies. The existence of slavery in this country brands your republicanism as a sham, your humanity as a base pretence, and your Christianity as a lie.... Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity which is outraged, in the name of liberty which is fettered, in the name of the constitution and the Bible, which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery—the great sin and shame of America! (1852, emp. added).

Douglass was insistent and adamant: to propagate the form of slavery in America at that time was to disregard and trample upon the Bible (and the Constitution!), and to misrepresent and deny the very essence of Christianity and the will of Christ.

Douglass surely understood the New Testament correctly. In a succinct personal note to a fellow Christian (Philemon), the apostle Paul presented a fascinating glimpse into the Christian attitude toward slavery. In a masterpiece of pathos, Paul blended together tender affection, encouraging commendation, unanswerable logic, heartfelt sympathy, and respectful persuasion to convince Philemon to exude Christian compassion.

In examining the successive thoughts that Paul offers in verses 1-15 and 18-25, one is apt to miss the primary point that the apostle was making. Stripping away the side points that he musters along the way in building his appeal allows the central purpose of the letter to come into view as a result of Paul’s triple repetition of “receive him” in verses 12, 15, and 17. He folds the culminating objective in between the latter two verses. The climax is seen in his explicit allusion to the nature of the reception: to get Philemon to receive Onesimus back “no longer as a slave” (vs. 16).

Here is the real message of Philemon—and the Christian stance on slavery: God would have slaves not to be treated as slaves! This divine intention effectively eradicates the forms of slavery that are deemed objectionable. To treat a slave as an equal (“more than a slave”—vs. 16), and to treat him the way one wishes to be treated himself (Matthew 7:12), strips the institution of slavery of its objectionable traits. Who would not want to be the “slave” of a person who treats you as a dear, beloved brother? Paul’s directives to masters elsewhere in the New Testament focus on this same necessity of being just, fair, impartial, and non-threatening (Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 4:1). Recognizing that slavery would continue in the Roman Empire until Christian principles were able to gradually permeate and infiltrate its institutions, Paul gave sensible advice to Corinthian Christians:

Let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called. Were you called while a slave? Do not be concerned about it; but if you can be made free, rather use it. For he who is called in the Lord while a slave is the Lord’s freedman. Likewise he who is called while free is Christ’s slave (1 Corinthians 7:20-22, emp. added).

A Christian can be a Christian anytime, anywhere. His commitment to Christ is unaffected by his environment or what others may do to him. If he can (ethically and scripturally) improve his physical circumstances, then certainly he is authorized to do so. But if not, “let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called,” that is, one must fulfill one’s pre-baptism (legitimate) obligations (which, in the case of slavery, may entail financial or other matters). The Christian’s focus is to remain on being faithful to God—even in the midst of very unjust or inhumane circumstances. This is the consistent portrait given in the New Testament (e.g., Ephesians 6:5-8; Colossians 3:22-24). It certainly is no overstatement to insist that if Christianity, in its pure and accurate form, were implemented throughout the world, the evils of slavery would be eradicated.

REFERENCES

Douglass, Frederick (1852), Oration Delivered in Corinthian Hall, Rochester, http://books.google.com/books?id=1glyAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=frederick+douglass&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cmlfT5zROISygwfG57yCCA&ved= 0CFcQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=frederick%20douglass&f=false.

Perspectives Matter by Eric Lyons, M.Min.

http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=11&article=1372

Perspectives Matter
by  Eric Lyons, M.Min.

Twice a year for the past few years I have visited the offices of a certified public accountant in Montgomery, Alabama. Since I rarely went to his place of business (or even the area in which his business is located), I had a difficult time remembering exactly what side of the road it was on. When I expected to see it on my right, it would strangely appear on my left. Then, just as sure as I thought it might be on my left, I would find it on my right. Maybe I was just confused. Perhaps my memory was failing me. For whatever reason, I never took the time to figure out why I had the distinct impression that sometimes this building should be on the opposite side of the road. Whenever the time came for me to see the CPA, I simply headed in the direction of his office, confident that I could find it, but unsure on which side of the road it would appear.

Recently, I finally learned why sometimes the building was on my left and other times it was on my right: I had not realized that the street on which this office is located is a long, slow-curving semi-circle. Both ends of the street eventually meet up at the same road, just one intersection apart from each other. Since the two intersections look very similar, I (like many men who are rather unobservant) never realized that I sometimes turned left at one intersection and other times turned left at the next intersection. When I took the first left, the office building always appeared on my right. When I took the second left, the building was always on my left. For whatever reason, I had never paid close enough attention. I had failed to consider that the apparent contradiction was merely the result of two different perspectives: one from the North, and one from the South.

Sadly, many people approach a study of the Bible as carelessly as I approached the CPA’s office building: they fail to consider the various perspectives at play. Approximately 40 different inspired men from all walks of life wrote the Bible over a period of 1,600 years. These men lived at different times in different places among different people in different cultures. They wrote in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and the original recipients of their writings varied greatly—from Jewish, to Greek, to Roman, to all men. Sometimes the Bible writers wrote chronologically (e.g., Genesis 1; Matthew 4:1-11); at other times they wrote thematically (e.g., Genesis 2; Luke 4:1-13). Sometimes they focused on a group of people (e.g., Matthew 28:1; Luke 23:55-24:1); at other times they targeted a particular person within the group (e.g., John 20:1).

Oftentimes when two or more Bible writers differ in their description of a certain event, skeptics cry “contradiction.” In reality, however, the skeptics have merely overlooked or dismissed the fact that the inspired penmen wrote from different perspectives. One question I continually get asked and hear skeptics frequently repeat is, “How did Judas die?” “Did he hang himself as Matthew wrote (27:5), or, as Luke indicated (Acts 1:18), did he fall headlong and ‘burst open in the middle’ and all his entrails gush out?” The answer: Judas hanged himself, and later his body fell (from wherever it was hanging), burst open, and his entrails spilled. Are Matthew and Luke’s accounts different? Yes. Are they contradictory? No. They simply wrote about two different, specific moments during the same general event.

If we fail to recognize the logical reasons for differences in life, we will continually find ourselves dazed and confused. Just as I was perplexed for years over the exact location of a particular office building, because I had not taken the time to consider the exact direction from which I approached the building, skeptics and others will never come to a proper understanding of Scripture until they recognize that perspectives play a major role.

BAPTIST AND THE CHRISTIAN (Dialogue continued) GEORGE L. FAULL


http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com/2017/03/baptist-and-christian-dialogue.html

BAPTIST AND THE CHRISTIAN

(Dialogue continued)

GEORGE L. FAULL


Baptist::           Since we last talked I have thought a lot about you teaching that “baptism” is essential to salvation.” I’ve thought of some things that just kind of blow that idea out of the water. No pun intended.
Christian:         Okay, I am sure ready to listen and learn.
Baptist::           When you teach that you have to “be baptized to be saved,” you are teaching that you can earn your salvation.
Christian:         Well, why do you think a person is baptized?
Baptist::           You are baptized to get into the Church.
Christian:         So, in other words, you earn your way into the Baptist Church.
Baptist::           Well, no, that is not true.
Christian:         Now wait. If I say that one is baptized into Christ to be saved, you say that I am teaching that you can earn your salvation, but if you teach that you are baptized to get into the Baptist Church, are you not teaching that you can earn your way into the Baptist Church? Is that logical?
Baptist::           Well, baptism is simply the means of getting into the Baptist Church so it is not really earning your way into the Baptist Church.
Christian:         But if I say one is baptized into Christ, it all of the sudden becomes a work of merit to earn salvation. Is that what you are saying?
Baptist::           Well, kind of, I guess.
Christian:         Well, my mind won’t make such a great leap of faith as to believe there is a difference between one being a work of merit and the other not. There is no merit at all in being baptized into Christ. Salvation is merited completely by what Christ did on the cross. Salvation is only in Christ, so I was baptized into Him “where all the promises of God are. I am saved by what happened to Him, not what happened to me. There is no condemnation to those “in Christ.” If one is “in Christ, he is a new creature, old things are passed away and all things are made new.” The only way I know to be “in Christ,” is to be baptized into Him. Paul says,
`“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.”
Galatians 3:27
Baptist::           Well, we believe you are baptized to be a member of the Baptist Church.
Christian:         Yes, I know that is what you believe, but you do not believe you have to be baptized to get into Heaven.
Baptist::           No way.
Christian:         Well, I guess then that you believe it is easier to get into Heaven than it is the Baptist Church.
Baptist::           Huh?
Christian:         Well, if you do not have to be baptized to get into Heaven, but you do to be a member of the Baptist Church, it takes more to get into the Baptist Church than it does to get into Heaven.
Baptist::           Okay, I’ll admit that.
Christian:         I reckon you would have to, because that is what you believe. Let me ask you how you were saved.
Baptist::           I just said the “sinner’s prayer,” and asked Jesus into my heart.
Christian:         What is the “sinner’s prayer?” And what is this “asking Jesus into your heart?” I have never read that in the Bible. Where is that?
Baptist::           I don’t know but I’m sure it’s in there. Even the radio preachers quote it. Revelation shows Jesus standing at the door and knocking. You have seen the famous picture of Jesus knocking on a door without a latch.  He won’t barge in. He knocks and you have to let Him in.
Christian:         Well, I have looked and looked for “sinner’s prayer” and have never found it. The artist probably took his idea from the Revelation picture, but that is Jesus knocking on the door of the lukewarm church, not on an alien sinner’s heart.
Baptist::           Oh, my! I have never noticed that before.
Christian:         Let me ask you, how old were you when you were saved? And how old were you when you were baptized?
Baptist::           I was ten when I said the “sinner’s prayer,” and was saved, but I was twelve when I was baptized and joined the Baptist Church.
Christian:         So you were saved two years outside the Baptist Church?
Baptist::           Yes.
Christian:         So one does not have to be a member of the Baptist Church to be saved?
Baptist::           Oh, no! There are a lot of people saved that are not in the Baptist Church!
Christian:         Well, that is encouraging to know. So you don’t think that you have to be in the Church to be saved?
Baptist::           Oh, no! You don’t believe that you have to be in the Church to be saved, do you?
Christian:         Well, I believe, if you are saved, you are in the Church. On Pentecost, those that gladly received the Word were baptized and the same day there were added about 3,000 souls.
Acts 2:42 and 47, “42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. 47 Praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.”
We believe the Lord adds you to His Church, not men.
Baptist:            Well, what kind of Church was it?
Christian:         Well, it is Christ’s Church. It is His body and by one spirit we are all baptized into one body.
I Corinthians 12:13, “For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether [we be] Jews or Gentiles, whether [we be] bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.”
Baptist:            So, you are saying, when you were baptized, you were added to the Church?
Christian:         Yes, we were baptized into Christ. We became a part of His body. When we were baptized into Christ, we were baptized into His death. We died with Him and arose with Him to walk in a newness of life.
Romans 6:4, “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.”
Baptist:            Well, let me change gears here. Paul specif-ically said,”Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel.” It follows then that baptism has no part of the Gospel.
Christian:         It is true, Paul was sent to preach, not merely baptize. This is true, but let’s follow your logic. Since Paul was not sent to baptize, he was not sent to make Baptists, since you have said that it takes “baptism to make a Baptist.”
Baptist:            Now, that is not what I said.
Christian:         No, it is just the logical conclusion to your argument. Furthermore, if baptism is no part of the Gospel, then the Baptist Church is no part of the Gospel. It is not a Gospel Church since it takes baptism to make a Baptist. Will you admit to that?
Baptist:            You frustrate me.
Christian:         (Smiling)No, truth frustrates you. I have just been using your logic on your own doctrine.
Baptist:            Well, maybe so, but I am proud to be a Baptist!
Christian:         But you are not a Baptist, sir.
Baptist:            What do you mean, “I’m not a Baptist?” I have been a Baptist for twenty years.
Christian:         No, sir. I am sorry to tell you, but you are not a Baptist.
Baptist:            Now what do you mean by such a statement?
Christian:         You have been a member of the baptist Church for twenty years, but have you baptized any one?
Baptist:            No, you have to be an ordained minister to administer “baptism.”
Christian:         Then you are not a Baptist. A Baptist is one who baptizes. That is why John was called “the Baptist.” You have baptized no one, so how can you be called “a Baptist?”
Baptist:            Sir, you are playing word games.
Christian:         Not really. Is one who does not do plumbing a plumber? Is one who has never driven a nail a carpenter? Is one who has never preached a preacher? Are you, sir, really a Baptist, if you have never baptized?
Baptist:            Oh, boy!
Christian:         The Great Commission says, “Go, teach and baptize.” Baptist preachers do that, but you don’t. You do not obey the Great Commission.
Baptist:            You may have something there, but one needs to go to a minister to be baptized.
Christian:         You fellows are always talking about a man out in the dessert with no water to baptize them. Let me ask you this. What would happen if a man wanted to be baptized on an island with no ordained Baptist preacher present? How could he become a member5 of the Baptist Christ?
Baptist:            He couldn’t, but he does not have to be a member of the Church to be saved.
Christian:         But the Bible says that the Church is what is going to be presented without spot and blemish.
Ephesians 5:27, “That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.“
II Corinthians 11:2, “For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present [you as] a chaste virgin to Christ.”
I don’t know of anyone but the Church that is going to be saved, since He adds the saved to His Church.
Acts 2:42, “And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.”
It is His Church which He purchased with His own blood.
Acts 20:28, “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.” 
It is the purchased ones who are redeemed. It is the redeemed ones who are saved. Yes, I believed all saved persons are a member of His Church.
Baptist:            Well, you have given me something to think about. I think my arguments are sound in the overall, though.
Christian:         (Smiling, putting his right arm around him, replies,) We will have to talk again. In the meantime, I don’t think your arguments on baptism hold water. Pun intended.

And with that, they both laughed and ended company.

James 1:22 “But be ye doers of the word, and
not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.”

WILL YOU BEG IN HARVEST? by B. Johnson

http://www.oldpaths.com/Archive/Johnson/Edna/Elizabeth/1939/beg.html

WILL YOU BEG IN HARVEST?

"The sluggard will not plow by reason of the cold; therefore shall he beg in harvest, and have nothing" (Proverbs 20:4).

What happens when a person plows in the cold weather? If he waits until there is no discomfort in his work, he won't often work. If we only preach the word at a convenient time, we are not plowing in the cold. We are told to:

"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine" (2 Tim 4:2).

Worldly people will force us to conform to their ways unless we are willing to suffer their hatred and scorn to follow Christ and His commands.

"And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God" (Rom 12:2).

Jesus refused to be conformed to the world – but his brothers fell to the temptation! Jesus told them:

"The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil" (John 7:7).

We must be willing to stand for Jesus even in the cold and even when the world hates us.

"And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolk, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. But there shall not an hair of your head perish. In your patience possess ye your souls (Luke 21:16-19).

We need to use the spiritual plow in cold weather as well as good weather. We should not be like the sluggard who has nothing when the harvest comes.

Beth Johnson

Published in The Old Paths Archive
(http://www.oldpaths.com)

The right direction by Gary Rose



What an unusual picture! This plane is actually viewed from many directions- all at the same time. But, what if the plane represented your life and each bubble a possibility. The world would still be the same, but your choice of a bubble would make all the difference, wouldn’t it?


As I viewed this picture, I thought of yesterday’s reading from the book of Acts, which said….


Acts 16 ( World English Bible )

1 He came to Derbe and Lystra: and behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timothy, the son of a Jewess who believed; but his father was a Greek.

2 The brothers who were at Lystra and Iconium gave a good testimony about him.

3 Paul wanted to have him go out with him, and he took and circumcised him because of the Jews who were in those parts; for they all knew that his father was a Greek.

4 As they went on their way through the cities, they delivered the decrees to them to keep which had been ordained by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.

5 So the assemblies were strengthened in the faith, and increased in number daily.

6 When they had gone through the region of Phrygia and Galatia, they were forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia.

7 When they had come opposite Mysia, they tried to go into Bithynia, but the Spirit didn’t allow them.

8 Passing by Mysia, they came down to Troas.

9 A vision appeared to Paul in the night. There was a man of Macedonia standing, begging him, and saying, “Come over into Macedonia and help us.”

10 When he had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go out to Macedonia, concluding that the Lord had called us to preach the Good News to them.

11 Setting sail therefore from Troas, we made a straight course to Samothrace, and the day following to Neapolis;

12 and from there to Philippi, which is a city of Macedonia, the foremost of the district, a Roman colony. We were staying some days in this city.


Coincidentally, I read Jeremiah 9 and 10 as well, which said…


Jeremiah 10 ( WEB )

23 Yahweh, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man who walks to direct his steps.


God gives us all a variety of choices, but whether we seek God’s will is our choice. If we continually seek God’s will in our lives, we will be directed by him and our lives will be better for it. But don’t boast about that, but rather boast about this…


Jeremiah 9 ( WEB )

23 Thus says Yahweh, Don’t let the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the mighty man glory in his might, don’t let the rich man glory in his riches;

24 but let him who glories glory in this, that he has understanding, and knows me, that I am Yahweh who exercises loving kindness, justice, and righteousness, in the earth: for in these things I delight, says Yahweh.


Don’t glory (we could very well substitute the word boast for this) in what you have or have done in this world, but rather how well you know God, the creator and sustainer of the universe! Do this and you definitely be headed in the right direction!

Overcoming Temptation by Alan Mullins


Overcoming Temptation

1.  Don’t blame God for temptation

 

2.  Don’t get hooked into temptation by your desires 

 

3.  Don’t let temptation become sin and take your life

 

4.  Don’t be fooled by the power of temptation