https://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=2842
Bill Nye: The (Pseudo-)Science Guy
[In light of the coming debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham on February 4th, we wish to recall your attention to Bill Nye’s statements several months ago regarding Creation and evolution.]
 |
|
wikipedia.org (Ed Schipul) 2012 CC-by-sa-2.0 |
Many of us who are scientists grew up watching “Bill Nye the Science
Guy,” and learned to love science in the process. Sadly, Bill Nye came
out in 2012 with a video that indicates he is vehemently opposed to
parents who teach children that evolutionary theory is false. In a
YouTube video posted by
BigThink.com, Nye said:
Denial of evolution is unique to the United States…. People still move
to the United States, and that’s largely because of the intellectual
capital we have—the general understanding of science. When you have a
portion of the population that doesn’t believe in that, it holds
everybody back. Really. Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life
science. In all of biology. It’s like, it’s very much analogous to
trying to do geology without believing in tectonic plates. You’re just
not going to get the right answer. Your whole world is just going to be a
mystery instead of an exciting place…. Once in awhile I get people that
really, or, that claim, they don’t believe in evolution. And my
response, generally, is, “Why not? Really. Why not?” Your world just
becomes fantastically complicated when you don’t believe in evolution.
Here are these ancient dinosaur bones or fossils. Here is radioactivity.
Here are distant stars that are just like our star but that are at a
different point in their life cyle. The idea of deep time, of this
billions of years, explains so much of the world around us. If you try
to ignore that, your world view just becomes crazy. Just untenable. It’s
self-inconsistent. And I say to the grown-ups: If you want to deny
evolution and live in your, in your, uh, world that’s completely
inconsistent with everything we observe in the Universe, that’s fine.
But don’t make your kids do it. Because we need them. We need
scientifically literate voters and tax payers for the future…. We need
engineers that can build stuff—solve problems…. In another couple
centuries, that world view, I’m sure, will be, just won’t exist. There’s
no evidence for it (Fowler and Rodd, 2012).
Such comments, though not surprising, certainly are unfortunate, since
so many young people have long hung on Bill Nye’s every word about
science.
Several points are worthy of mentioning in response to Mr. Nye. It is
true that widespread denial of evolution seems to be somewhat unique to
the United States (see Miller, 2012), although there are other
contenders (cf. Le Page, 2008). It is also true that many people clamor
to get into the United States and that the United States has been the
leader in the technological revolution over the last century. What’s
unfortunate is that
Nye totally ignores the fact that America
has become the superpower that we are in science and in every other
field—while largely not believing in evolution. America has
historically been Christian and pro-Bible (and thus, anti-evolution),
and in truth, it is due to that stance that America has flourished.
Becoming more pro-evolution would actually move us in the opposite
direction from the direction that has made us great in the first place.
Believing in evolution will actually “hold America back”—while believing
in Creation has not.
Nye believes that dinosaur fossils, radioactivity, distant stars, and
deep time prove evolution and disprove Creation. As you know, we address
such matters on a regular basis (e.g., Lyons and Butt, 2008; DeYoung,
2005; Lyons, 2011; Miller, 2010) and have shown that the scientific
evidence supports the Creation model rather than the Evolutionary model.
The Creation model can offer reasonable explanations, in keeping with
the scientific evidence, for the existence of matter, energy, life, the
laws of science, design, beauty, religious intuition, morality,
“anomalies” in the geologic column, and many other things, while the
evolutionary model falls far short. It is the evolutionary model that is
“completely inconsistent” with much of what we observe in the Universe.
In truth, it is the evolutionary model that is holding back the
progress of science. If evolutionary scientists would stop spending time
and money in pursuit of unscientific notions (like trying to figure out
how abiogenesis could happen, even though science has already disproven
that idea time and again; or how something material could come from
nothing or exist forever, even though science has already disproven
those ideas time and again; or trying to find “missing link” fossils
that prove that we came from ape-like creatures, when over 130 years of
exploration into the geologic column has not helped in that pursuit),
and begin interpreting the scientific evidence in light of the Creation
model, much more progress could be made, as was the case in America’s
past.
Evolutionary theory spawned the false concept of vestigial organs. That
idea would have all but stopped scientific research on those organs,
since according to evolutionary theory, those organs are now useless or
nearly so. Now we are realizing that those organs are not vestigial, but
important, and we are reaping the effects of evolutionists’ lack of
emphasis on those organs for over a century. Little research has been
done on many of those organs in the past century due to the vestigial
argument. On the other hand, when scientists have turned their attention
towards the created order for scientific inspiration—as creationists do
since we understand that the Chief Engineer designed it—they are
discovering that the Universe is replete with fully functional, amazing
designs worthy of mimicking. The Creation model is hardly a hinderance
to scientific progress. Contrary to Nye’s charge to parents—we encourage
parents to continue to advocate the creationist mindset! The fruit of
that pursuit has been the emergence of the most advanced and prosperous
country in the history of mankind (cf. Skousen, 2009). Teach your kids
the truth! “We need scientifically literate voters and tax payers for
the future. We need engineers that can build stuff—solve problems.”
In a CBS interview after the release of the video, Nye talked about his passion concerning evolutionary theory.
I feel passionate about it for the betterment of the United States,
the United States economy, and our future. What makes the United States
great—the reason people want to live in the United States, move here
still—is because of our ability to innovate. This goes back to Ben
Franklin and Thomas Alva Edison and George Washington Carver, let alone
landing on the moon—Neil Armstrong. All these people believed in science
(“Bill Nye on Creationism Critique…,” 2012).
While we disagree that the “reason people want to live in the United
States” is solely our ability to innovate, we certainly agree that the
freedom and encouragement to engage in innovative endeavors in this
country is a significant perk in coming here. However, Nye has failed to
realize that the freedom to innovate in this country stems from the
fundamental belief held by the Founders of this country—that men have
been “endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights,” including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These
unalienable Rights, according to the Founders, were derived from the God
of the Bible, in which, the Founders, en masse, believed (see Miller,
2008b). Belief in the Bible has resulted in fewer evolutionists in
America—since Darwinian evolution and the biblical account of Creation
cannot be harmonized (see Thompson, 2000). And yet, again, America is
still greater than, perhaps, any other country in the history of the
world.
Ironically, Nye mentions Franklin, Carver, and Armstrong among the
great scientists of history. Franklin, though less religious than many
of the Founders, was still a strong proponent of biblical morality in
America and believed in the God of the Bible. Carver was a well-known
Creation
scientist, and Armstrong was among this country’s pioneering astronauts
who even read from the Bible from space during television broadcasts
(see Miller, 2008a). Nye failed to mention the fact that many great
scientists from history have made significant contributions to the field
of science, even though they were firm believers in God and Creation.
Johannes Kepler, the father of modern astronomy and modern optics, was a
firm Bible believer. Robert Boyle, the father of chemistry, was a Bible
believer. Samuel F.B. Morse, who invented Morse Code, was a believer.
Wernher Von Braun, the father of the space program at NASA, was a strong
believer in God and Creation, as well as Louis Pasteur, the father of
biology, Lord Kelvin, the father of thermodynamics, Sir Isaac Newton,
the father of modern physics, and Faraday, the father of
electromagnetism. Dozens of other well-known scientists from history
could be cited (see Morris, 1990).
Although numbers ultimately mean nothing in regard to truth,
creationists can certainly come up with an impressive list of qualified
scientists living today who have examined the scientific evidence and
concluded that the evolutionary model falls short in explaining our
existence.
Creation Ministries International posted a list of
some 187 scientists alive today (or recently deceased) who believe in
the biblical account of creation (“Creation Scientists…,” 2010). The
scientists who are listed all possess a doctorate in a science-related
field. Over 90 different scientific fields are represented in the list,
including several types of engineers, chemists, geneticists, physicists,
and biologists. Astronomers and astrophysicists; geologists and
geophysicists; physicians and surgeons; micro-, molecular, and
neurobiologists; paleontologists and zoologists are represented, and the
list goes on. Jerry Bergman amassed a list of more than 3,000
individuals. Most have a Ph.D. in science, and many more could be added,
according to Bergman.
On my list I have well over 3,000 names including Nobel Prize winners,
but, unfortunately, a large number of persons that could be added to
the public list, including many college professors, did not want their
name listed because of real concerns over possible retaliation or harm
to their careers (2006).
For over 30 years, we at Apologetics Press have conducted numerous
seminars and published hundreds of articles by qualified, credentialed
scientists who speak out in support of the biblical account of creation
as well—scientists with graduate degrees in geology, astrophysics,
microbiology, neurobiology, cell biology, biochemistry, aerospace
engineering, nuclear engineering, and biomechanical engineering.
Creationists can certainly speak with credibility in scientific
matters—and we can show with confidence that the scientific evidence
does not support Bill Nye and his evolutionary theory.
Concerning a recent NASA conference he attended, Nye noted how
extraordinary it is that anybody in the world could attend that
conference in a sense, since it was broadcast all around the world using
technology that did not exist in the past, but now does, thanks to
science. “That’s a result of science. That’s not a result of thinking
the Earth is some extraordinarily short number of years old” (“Bill Nye
on Creationism…,” 2012). It is true that our technology is a result of
science, and in a sense, it is not necessarily all due to “thinking the
Earth is some extraordinarily short number of years old,” since not all
technological breakthroughs or hang-ups are necessarily the result of
one’s belief on the age of the Earth. However, technology is also not a
result of thinking the Earth is some extraordinarily
long number of years old either. One’s belief about how old the Earth is does not
necessarily directly
affect the findings of science. Even prominent evolutionists recognize
that one does not need to believe in Darwinian evolution in order to be a
scientist. Richard Dawkins of Oxford University said, “a student of,
say, nerve cells, might decide that he is not aided by thinking about
evolution. The nerve specialist agrees that his nerve cells are the
products of evolution, but
he does not need to use this fact in
his research…. That is a defensible position…. A physicist certainly
doesn’t need Darwinism in order to do physics” (1996, p. 283, emp. added). A person’s stance on evolutionary theory may not
directly affect his scientific findings, but it certainly can
indirectly
affect his findings through God’s Providence—as has been manifested
throughout the history of this country and the blessings that Almighty
God has bestowed upon us through scientific advancement. When God is
happy with the decisions of a country, the country is blessed with
prosperity and advancement (Psalm 33:12). So, Bill Nye and people like
him are a hindrance to scientific progress. Why? (1) Because his views
foster the acceptance of false information and hinder the free exchange
of ideas; (2) Because many scientific man hours are wasted on pursuing
pseudo-science; and (3) Because his unbiblical view of the origin of the
Universe will ultimately lead to the drying up of the fountain of God’s
providential scientific blessings in this country. May God help us to
boldly fight this war for the soul of America.
REFERENCES
Bergman, Jerry (2006), “Darwin Skeptics,” [On-line], URL: http://www.rae.org/darwinskeptics.html.
“Bill Nye on Creationism Critique: I’m Not Attacking Religion” (2012),
CBS News, August 28,
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505270_162-57501492/bill-nye-on-creationism-critique-im-not-attacking-religion/.
“Creation Scientists and Other Specialists of Interest” (2010), Creation Ministries International,
http://creation.com/creation-scientists.
Dawkins, Richard (1996),
The Blind Watchmaker (New York: W.W. Norton).
DeYoung, Don (2005),
Thousands...Not Billions (Green Forest, AR: Master Books).
Fowler, Jonathan and Elizabeth Rodd (2012), “Bill Nye: Creationism is Not Appropriate for Children,”
BigThink.com,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbYJfwFgOU.
Le Page, Michael (2008), “Evolution Myths: It Doesn’t Matter if People Don’t Grasp Evolution,”
New Scientist, 198[2652]:31, April 19.
Lyons, Eric (2011), “Common Sense, Miracles, and the Apparent Age of the Earth,” Apologetics Press,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=4082.
Lyons, Eric and Kyle Butt (2008),
The Dinosaur Delusion (Montgomery: AL: Apologetics Press).
Miller, Dave (2008a), “American Astronauts: From Belief to Unbelief,” Apologetics Press,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=12&article=2490.
Miller, Dave (2008b),
The Silencing of God (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press).
Miller, Jeff (2010), “Inevitable—Given Enough Time?” Apologetics Press,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=3729.
Miller, Jeff (2012), “Literal Creationists Holding Their Ground in the Polls,”
Reason & Revelation, 32[9]:94-95, September (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press).
Morris, Henry M. (1990),
Men of Science Men of God: Great Scientists Who Believed in the Bible (El Cajon, CA: Master Books), third printing.
Skousen, W. Cleon (2009),
The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle That Changed the World (Malta, ID: National Center for Constitutional Studies), 17
th printing.
Thompson, Bert (2000),
Creation Compromises (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press), second edition,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/pdfs/e-books_pdf/cre_comp.pdf.
