https://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=49
Natural Attenuation: Proof of Divine Design
[EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article was written by one of A.P.’s
auxiliary staff scientists. James Spencer holds a B.S. degree in
Environmental Geology and an M.S. degree in Geology from the University
of Mississippi. He has 24 years of technical services in the
geosciences, including six years with the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality, as well as 18 years with private environmental
consulting firms. Accredited as a Professional Geologist in three states
(Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas), Mr. Spencer holds membership in
the Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists. He
presently serves as Senior Hydrogeologist with EcoScience Resource
Group.]
As a working hydrogeologist, I am constantly reminded of God’s
handiwork. From the stratigraphic layers examined during drilling
operations, to the calculation of groundwater velocities and contaminant
transport based on complex governing equations, it is evident that a
pre-planned, intentional system is in place. Evolutionists would have us
believe that these natural processes have occurred by chance.
Nevertheless, I have no doubt that these systems are the work of God. I
am reminded of Deuteronomy 3:24—“O Lord God, You have begun to show Your
servant Your greatness and Your mighty hand, for what god is there in
heaven or on earth who can do anything like Your works and Your mighty
deeds?”
GROUNDWATER & REACTIVE TRANSPORT MODELING FOR REMEDIAL DESIGN
In 1984, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) named a hazardous waste site in the state of Louisiana to the National Priority List (NPL).
It was estimated at the time that the site held approximately eight
million cubic feet of contaminated materials. A computer model was
constructed for the site that would simulate the contaminant movement in
the subsurface. Modeling efforts resulted in a successful negotiation
with the EPA for monitored natural attenuation as the accepted remediation alternative. (“Natural
attenuation” refers to the reduction, weakening, and eventual
elimination of toxic substances in the soil and groundwater by nature’s
own processes.) This EPA determination
was a milestone for the site. Previously a pump-and-treat system, which
was based on an initial groundwater model developed to simulate
hydraulic containment, had cost millions of dollars to install, operate,
and maintain. A carbon absorption system was used to treat the
contaminated water recovered. By July 1998, over 170 wells were
operational.
During this time of recovery well installation in the mid-1990s, field
investigations continued in the direction the contaminants were
anticipated to flow. Laboratory analysis of water samples discovered the
presence of vinyl chloride (VC)—a compound not
present in the parent (original waste) material. At the time, the
presence of vinyl chloride confused investigators. After consultation
with other governmental agencies, it was assumed that degradation
(chemical breakdown) of the parent material was producing vinyl chloride
as a daughter product. However, the driving agent of this degradation
process, known as reductive dechlorination, was not fully understood.
Natural attenuation was discussed, but was not yet an accepted
environmental remedial alternative (i.e., clean-up solution) with the
regulatory agencies. Change came with the release of a 1999 directive by
the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER), titled “Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites.”
As research continued at this site (and others throughout the United
States), the degradation process became better understood. Reductive
dechlorination is a biological process that is used to describe certain
types of biodegradation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater. For
example, tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE),
and other chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons in groundwater, can be
biodegraded by naturally occurring anaerobic bacteria (i.e., bacteria
that are able to live without oxygen), most commonly of the genera dehalococcoides through a sequential degradation process. PCE degrades to TCE, TCE to dichloroethene (DCE), DCE to vinyl chloride (VC), and VC
to ethene. This biodegradation occurs when anaerobic bacteria present
in the contaminated site take electrons from organic compounds (called
“electron donors”) and produce H2. The dechlorinating bacteria use the
electron in the H2 to replace a chlorine atom.
Scientists wanted to substantiate these degradation processes, as well
as develop rate constants for the reactive transport model (a computer
model to simulate the transport of chemical compounds in groundwater,
including the degradation of parent compounds and generation of daughter
compounds). With the goal of observing the potential for natural
attenuation of the chlorinated ethanes and ethenes present at the site,
hydrogeologists conducted microcosm experiments to determine both the
pathways and rates of contaminant transformation under natural
conditions. The results indicated that the microbial population
necessary to dechlorinate contaminants was naturally present in the site sediments. With this fact in hand, researchers could now define the degradation pathway.
Researches then developed a three-dimensional reactive transport model (RT3D—a
multi-species reactive flow and transport simulation computer software)
for the site, utilizing the results of the microcosm experiments to
develop a site-specific reaction package to simulate the degradation
processes. The model was calibrated to current conditions in order to
make future predictions. Results indicated that the contaminant plume
would stabilize over time and no sensitive receptors (i.e., drinking
water aquifer, surface water body, etc.) would be impacted.
Consequently, the EPA approved monitored natural attenuation as the selected remedial alternative.
Microbial Population
Researchers conducted laboratory experiments in an attempt to identify,
define, and quantify the microbial population present within the site
subsurface (see Bae, et al., 2006; Bowman, et al., 2006). These efforts
resulted in the identification of several unique microscopic bacteria,
known as 16S rRNA gene sequences, that are closely related to Dehalococcoides ethenogenes.
In addition, two new anaerobic bacterial strains were isolated and
identified for the first time, and subsequently named after the site.
The data demonstrated that a large number of novel bacteria were present
in groundwater within the source zone, and the population appeared to
contain bacterial components necessary to carry out reductive
dechlorination.
Evolution of Thought
As noted in the above discussion, the “expert” thought has evolved from
a pump-and-treat-solution to monitored natural attenuation as the
accepted remedial alternative at this site. A computer model to simulate
the degradation processes was developed for the site to simulate
groundwater flow and contaminant transport with a site-specific reaction
package. With a better understanding of the degradation processes and
bacteria populations providing the driving force, natural attenuation
has become an accepted remedial alternative at this site and many
contaminated sites throughout the country. Despite increased
understanding, scientists have yet to provide a complete and adequate
definition of the microbial populations naturally present at all
remedial sites.
BUT WHERE DID IT COME FROM?
To recap, in order to develop a computer model to simulate groundwater
flow and contaminant transport, scientists must come to a proper
understanding of the geologic, hydrologic, and biological processes
occurring at the site. This understanding is fundamental when the goal
is to develop a defensible strategy for monitored natural attenuation
for presentation to regulatory agencies. Most importantly, the biologic processes at the Louisiana NPL site have been shown to be active and sufficient for reductive dechlorination of contaminants.
But where did these microbial populations come from? Did they evolve to
serve this purpose? Impossible, since, in direct contradiction to the
evolutionary hypothesis, they would have had to evolve over a short
period of time. After all, the contaminants present were not in
existence millions of years ago. For example, PCE
is a manufactured chemical compound widely used to dry clean fabrics
and degrease metals. Michael Faraday first synthesized it in 1821 by
heating hexachloroethane until it decomposed into PCE and chlorine. Since evolution cannot account for their presence, where did these microbes come from?
For creationists, the answer is simple and obvious. God created these
bacteria. Humans did not create this built-in method of breaking down
and neutralizing the artificial/synthetic toxic chemicals introduced by
humans into the environment. All the efforts of feeble man to
decontaminate the hazardous waste site were secondary, perhaps even
superfluous, to the naturally occurring attenuation processes already
present in the environment. The only logical explanation is that the
Creator of the Earth deliberately embedded restorative properties in the
environment in order for it to sustain itself for the Creator’s
purpose. Essentially, all we “educated” humans can do is observe,
monitor, document, and assign sophisticated jargon to what nature does automatically. God created His earthly creation to be self-sustaining, restorative, and resilient.
BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVE
In the beginning, God created the Earth to be inhabited by man, and for
man to rule the Earth and its resources (Genesis 1:26-30; Psalm 8:6-8).
In addition, God placed within the dynamics of the Earth the processes
by which He sustains it. The microbial populations that we scientists
are just now identifying, and whose purpose we are just now beginning to
understand, were created by God to sustain His creation. It is
certainly true that man has made mistakes that have been detrimental to
God’s Earth. However, it is also true that God is in control, and no
matter what humans do—accidentally or purposefully—that may be harmful
to the environment, God will sustain this Earth until it has served His
purpose! “By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the
word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things
which are visible” (Hebrews 11:3).
REFERENCES
Bae, H.S., Moe, W.M., Yan, J., Tiago, I., da Dosta, M.S., and Rainey,
F.A. (2006), “Brooklawnia Cerclae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., A
Propionate-Forming Bacterium Isolated From Chlorosolvent-Contaminated
Groundwater,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 56:1977-1983.
Bowman, K.S., Moe, W.M, Rash, B.A., Bae, H.S., and Rainey, R.A. (2006),
“Bacterial Diversity of an Acidic Louisiana Groundwater Contaminated by
Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Containing Chloroethanes and Other
Solvents,” FEMS Microbiology and Ecology, 58:120-133, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
U.S. EPA (1999), “Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, RCRA
Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank Sites.” United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Directive Number 9200 (Washington, D.C.: OSWER).
