http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=4620
Directed Panspermia and Little, Green (Non-Existent) Men from Outer Space
Science
is supposed to be observation-based, according to the National Academy
of Sciences. “The statements of science must invoke only
natural
things and processes. The statements of science are those that emerge
from the application of human intelligence to data obtained from
observation and experiment” (
Teaching About Evolution…,
1998, p. 42, emp. added). The evolutionary community openly advocates
this idea—at least, as long as it doesn’t get in the way of its baseless
atheistic evolutionary presuppositions. Directed panspermia is a
relatively recent example of evolutionists’ brazen contradiction of
their own “observation and experiment” rule.
If there is no God, as the atheist claims, then how did life originate?
Did it spontaneously generate? More and more scientists are conceding
that there’s just too much scientific evidence against abiogenesis for
it to be palatable. After all, even the evolution-based biology and life
science textbooks openly admit that the work of Pasteur, Spallanzani,
and Redi disproved abiogenesis (e.g., Coolidge-Stolz, et al., 2005, pp.
36-37;
National Geographic…, et al., 2005, p. 19; Miller and
Levine, 2006, pp. 12-13). But if life did not create itself, it had to
come from somewhere, and the atheist “cannot allow a Divine Foot in the
door” (Lewontin, 1997, p. 31). So, where is he left? Outer space?
That is precisely what many in the evolutionary community are hoping
for. Some, like distinguished British astronomer Fred Hoyle and Chandra
Wickramasinghe, professor of astronomy and applied mathematics at
University College, Cardiff, Wales, realizing that the import of the Law
of Biogenesis cannot be ignored (see
Miller,
2012a), have jettisoned abiogenesis theory in support of the alien seed
theory, or “directed panspermia.” This theory speculates that life did
not spontaneously generate on Earth, but rather was brought here by
alien life forms 3.8 billion years ago and evolutionary development has
since been directed by them (“Professor’s Alien Life…,” 2010; Hoyle, et
al., 1984). Nobel laureate Sir Francis Crick, who co-discovered the
double helix structure of the DNA molecule, suggested that life was sent
here from other planets as well (1981). Famous atheist, theoretical
physicist, and cosmologist of Cambridge University, Stephen Hawking,
believes that aliens almost certainly exist, but believes humans should
be leery about making contact with them, since they may raid our
resources. According to him, we should use everything in our power to
avoid contact. He said, “If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much
as when Columbus landed in America, which didn’t turn out well for the
Native Americans” (“Stephen Hawking Warns…,” 2010). Some have suggested
that life simply fell to Earth from space after having evolved from the
warm, wet nucleus of a comet (see Gribbin, 1981; Hoyle and
Wickramasinghe, 1981). [NOTE: We have addressed this idea elsewhere
(e.g.,
Miller, 2012b).] In
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,
well-known British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, Oxford
University’s Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 to
2008, said concerning the possibility of intelligent design:
It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the Universe, a
civilization evolved by, probably, some kind of Darwinian means, to a
very, very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that
they seeded onto, perhaps, this planet. Now that is a possibility, and
an intriguing possibility. And I suppose it’s possible that you might
find evidence for that, if you look at the details of our chemistry,
molecular biology, you might find a signature of some kind of designer.
And that designer could well be a higher intelligence from elsewhere in
the Universe (Stein and Miller, 2008).
So, according to Dawkins, there could be a designer, and we could find
evidence of that designer in the “details of our chemistry.” Does that
sound familiar? It should. That is one of the fundamental arguments
theists have made for centuries in support of the existence of God—the
Teleological Argument. There is clear design in the Universe, and design
demands a designer.
Ultimately, since there is no evidence for the existence of aliens,
there can hardly be any evidence for their establishing life on Earth.
Such an idea can hardly be in keeping with the evolutionist’s own
beliefs about the importance of direct observation and experiment in
science. Such a theory does nothing but tacitly admit (1) the truth of
the Law of Biogenesis—in nature, life comes only from life; and (2) the
necessity of a creator/designer in the equation—in this case, aliens.
However, notice: since aliens are beings of nature, they too must be
governed by the laws of nature. Dawkins went on to say, “But that higher
intelligence would, itself, had to have come about by some ultimately
explicable process. It couldn’t have just jumped into existence
spontaneously” (Stein and Miller, 2008). So, the alien creators,
according to Dawkins, have been strapped with the laws of nature as
well. Thus, the problem of abiogenesis is merely shifted to the alien’s
abode, where the question of the origin of life must still be answered.
No wonder evolutionary astrophysicist and astronomy journalist, Stuart
Clark, rejects the alien seed theory. Writing in
New Scientist,
Clark stated that its probability is so “remote,” it should be left
aside (2008, 199[2675]:30). Bottom line: A Being not governed by the
laws of nature is needed to initiate life, according to the Law of
Biogenesis. The Bible, a book containing
supernatural characteristics, tells us Who that Being is. [NOTE: See
Thompson, 2004 for more on the question of extraterrestrial life.]
REFERENCES
Clark, Stuart (2008), “Where Did Life Come From?”
New Scientist, 199[2675]:30-31, September 27.
Coolidge-Stolz, Elizabeth, Jan Jenner, Marylin Lisowski, Donald Cronkite, and Linda Cronin Jones (2005),
Life Science (Boston, MA: Prentice Hall).
Crick, Francis (1981),
Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature (New York: Simon and Schuster).
Gribbin, John (1981), “Of a Comet Born,”
Science Digest, 89[3]:14, April.
Hoyle, Fred and Chandra Wickramasinghe (1981),
Evolution from Space (London: J.M. Dent & Sons).
Hoyle, Fred and Chandra Wickramasinghe (1984),
Evolution from Space: A Theory of Cosmic Creationism (New York: Simon and Schuster).
Lewontin, Richard (1997), “Billions and Billions of Demons,”
The New York Review, January 9.
Miller, Jeff (2012a), “The Law of Biogenesis,”
Reason & Revelation, 32[1]:2-11, January,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apPubPage.aspx?pub=1&issue=1018&article=1722.
Miller, Jeff (2012b), “Space: The Womb of Life?”
Reason & Revelation, 32[6]:62-64, June,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apPubPage.aspx?pub=1&issue=1032.
Miller, Kenneth R. and Joseph S. Levine (2006),
Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).
National Geographic Education Division, Lucy Daniel, Peter Rillero, Alton Biggs, Edward Ortleb, and Dinah Zike (2005),
Life Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill/Glencoe).
“Professor’s Alien Life ‘Seed’ Theory Claimed” (2010),
BBC News, February 1,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/south_east/8491398.stm.
Stein, Ben and Kevin Miller (2008),
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (Premise Media).
“Stephen Hawking Warns Over Making Contact with Aliens” (2010),
BBC News, April 25,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/8642558.stm.
Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science(1998), National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
Thompson, Bert (2004), “Is There Intelligent Life in Outer Space?” Apologetics Press,
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=1129.
