https://executableoutlines.com/topical_series/christian-apologetics/ca_03.html
"CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS"
Our Dependence Upon The New Testament
INTRODUCTION
- We have seen the evidence from UNBIASED SOURCES that establishes Jesus of Nazareth...
- As a person of history
- Who lived and died in the First Century A.D.
- But we also pointed out that such sources tell us nothing about...
- Who He was
- What He did ...to earn such a reputation that, centuries later, His teachings and life still has so much influence in our society
- For the Christian, the only record which describes in any detail the life and death of Jesus is the NEW TESTAMENT
- But as a HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, is it reliable?
- Can we trust it to be accurate in relating facts of history con- cerning Jesus, His life, death and resurrection?
- Can we even have confidence that what we have today in the form of the New Testament is an accurate copy of that penned by the original authors?
- These are some of the questions we shall attempt to answer as we begin to examine "THE HISTORICAL RELIABILITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT"
[But first, for CHRISTIANS to appreciate the importance of this subject, it may help to demonstrate how dependent our faith is on the reliability of the New Testament as a historical document...]
- WHY DO WE BELIEVE THAT JESUS IS THE CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD?
- THE "ANSWERS" WE MOST LIKELY WOULD GIVE ARE...
- "Because of the miracles He did"
- "Because He fulfilled hundreds of the Messianic prophecies found in the Old Testament"
- "Because He rose from the dead"
- BUT WHERE DOES ONE LEARN ABOUT THESE THINGS?
- Where do we read about His miracles? THE NEW TESTAMENT!
- Who says that He fulfilled the Messianic prophecies? THE AUTHORS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT!
- What evidence is there for the resurrection of Jesus Christ? AGAIN, IT IS PRIMARILY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!
- WHAT IF IT WERE SHOWN CONCERNING THE NEW TESTAMENT...
- THAT IT WAS WRITTEN OVER 100 YEARS AFTER THE EVENTS SUPPOSEDLY HAPPENED?
- Then the New Testament was not written by eyewitnesses, nor by those whose names are connected with it (Paul, Peter, etc.)!
- It was the general consensus of many scholars in the last century that the New Testament was in fact composed during the Second Century A.D., not the First
- If such is true, then the New Testament is a FORGERY!
- THAT IT IS FILLED WITH ERRORS IN REFERENCE TO GEOGRAPHY, PEOPLE, AND EVENTS?
- Then how could we trust the authors of the New Testament to be accurate in describing supernatural events, when they were careless with describing the natural ones?
- This would make the New Testament an UNRELIABLE RECORD!
- THAT THE MANUSCRIPT EVIDENCE IS VERY SCARCE, AND A THOUSAND YEARS REMOVED FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS?
- Then we would have no way of testing the accuracy of the copyists, who for hundreds of years preserved the New Testament only by making copies by hand
- Then our faith in Jesus would be based upon shallow ground, upon a document which is historically questionable!
- OUR FAITH IN JESUS IS DEPENDENT ON THE NEW TESTAMENT BEING RELIABLE AS A HISTORICAL DOCUMENT!
- "BLIND FAITH" MAY SEEM ADEQUATE FOR SOME...
- For children who believe whatever their parents say
- For people who are never placed in an environment where their faith is challenged (like state universities)
- For people who are not trying to convince others to trust in Jesus for their salvation
- BUT IF WE DESIRE TO HAVE A "STRONG FAITH" FOR OURSELVES AND OTHERS...
- Then we need to understand our dependency upon the New Testament
- We need to know how to demonstrate the evidence which supports it as a reliable, historical document!
CONCLUSION
- Hopefully, we now appreciate the need to carefully examine the evidence for the historical reliability of the New Testament
- In doing so, we shall apply the same kind of tests applied to any ancient document to determine its reliability!
- The next study will examine what is the "ACID TEST" for any ancient document claiming to be a historical record of certain events...
Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2022