Most boring book in the Bible?
We call a thing boring if it
doesn’t hold our attention. A thing doesn’t hold our attention when it
doesn’t reward our investment or, at least, when it is less rewarding
than other things that are going on at the same time. Some literature is
like that. Some biblical literature is like that. The book of Numbers
is a bit like that, with its reams of names that are hard to pronounce
and lots of laws that mean nothing to a modern reader. Even if the names
were easy to pronounce, we don’t know the people and so they hold no
interest for us. It’s like reading a telephone book. Much of the
information in the book of Numbers was out of date even for ancient
Israel once they entered the land of Canaan and what wasn’t out of date
would have meant little to a generation that had never experienced the
various stations in the Wilderness wandering.
As a novel a book
like Numbers wouldn’t sell. As a history book it wouldn’t be readable
and would lack all kinds of things that a history book calls for. As a
tour guide it would be tossed aside and as a sheer information source it
would be as useful as a 1950’s bus schedule. How did a book like that
get into the Bible? How did it remain there all these centuries? The
answer’s complex and ranges from saying that God wanted it there to
saying it is an integral piece of a larger whole to saying it has riches
that a modern reader with a short and limited attention span has no
interest in.
And it doesn’t help English 21st century readers to notice that the book is named Numbers (the Greek is Arithmoi). Unless you’re an accountant or a mathematician you'd tend to think the book tedious.
The most adopted Hebrew name is Bamidbar
("in the wilderness") and it's probably true that that Hebrew name is
more appropriate. For it’s when we remember that the events all take
place in the wilderness that our appreciation of what happens there is sharpened.
One
of the appropriate criticisms I’ve heard of a lot of writing is that it
leaves nothing to the imagination. The reader must be told every single
thought in a character’s mind and detailed explanations or descriptions
must be offered for every scene. I suspect that hurts our capacity to
read and imagine. We’re supposed to use our imagination in reading the
Bible and our imagination is nowhere more fruitful than when reading a
book like Numbers (Bamidbar).
With only a little imagination we
can imagine Abraham and Sarah standing on a high hill somewhere, looking
down on the assembled and organized nation and remembering the call of
God. A man old in body and his wife unable to have children and yet this
vast family below them is their family.
With only a
little imagination as we look at the nation encamped below we can
imagine a series of circles within circles (or squares within squares).
In the center is the sovereign and holy Lord who is exalted above all,
encircled by priests who no longer are numbered with the tribes of
Israel but who in standing between God and the people protect the people
from the wrath of God. And priests who "protect" God from the
profanation of the people who would tend to become too familiar with
him. Familiarity may not breed contempt but it can weaken one’s sense of
awe.
With only a little imagination we can see God at the
physical center of the entire encampment and nation and by that we’re
told that that is the place he not only deserves but the place Israel
must acknowledge him to deserve. If they do not, they are in mortal
danger from many destructive inner enemies.
With only a little imagination we can read the names and divisions in the book of Numbers and see the army of the living God. We’ve seen epic movies like Spartacus or Braveheart or The Gladiator
and were awed by the size and power and unity of the divisions. It
draws the reader or viewer into that world of purpose and mission and
they become part of that enterprise. In the New Testament the Hebrew
writer does that very thing (and more) when he reminds the believers
what they had become part of (see 12:22-24). There’s something about
that that gives us added strength and assurance. Knowing that we’re
standing and marching shoulder to shoulder with a vast company of others
and that we all have a single purpose and destiny gives us a strong
sense of belonging. To know that others are "laying their lives on the
line" give us the courage to do the same.
With only a little
imagination we can guess at how astonished we would be to see such a
thriving multitude of living, worshiping people surviving—and more than
mere "surviving"—in such an impossible environment. We’d note the chaos
of the wilderness and the harmony of the encamped or marching people.
The very "impossibility" of it would make us wonder at how they could be there and thrive there; we would wonder how it was accomplished and how they came to be there and that
would lead us to the larger Story. And if God can gather and sustain a
nation in the chaos of the Sinai wilderness maybe he can gather and
sustain a nation in the chaos of the nations.
Bamidbar (Numbers)
is about a people that forgot both the power and faithfulness of their
God. They forgot that he created wilderness and that he was the Lord of
it (he turned Egypt into a wilderness—see Exodus chapters 7—11). They
forgot that it was his faithfulness to his promises to Abraham, Isaac
and Jacob that led him to deliver Israel from oppression in Egypt.
[Contrast 22:6 with Genesis 12:3.]
Bamidbar (Numbers) is about a
generation that was too afraid and too tired and too trustless to follow
the dream (the promise) and reap the benefits.
Bamidbar
(Numbers) is about a generation that prized basic essentials in slavery
greater than freedom and hope through hard times. [See 11:4-6 and 33
where they desired Egypt again for its meat and got its plagues. See too
16:13 where they called Egypt a land flowing with milk and honey. Contast this with Exodus 3:8.]
Bamidbar
(Numbers) cures us of our over-eager tendency to side with sinners
against God. In this way it exposes our own (perhaps) subconscious
tendency to murmur that things aren’t going as we would like them. We
note their wilderness conditions and "understand" too easily Israel’s
complaining; we feel sorry for Moses that he didn’t get into Canaan;
we’re inclined to think God was harsh in excluding that entire
generation, including more than 14,000 in the Korah rebellion and 24,000
at Peor (25:9). But Bamidbar (Numbers) while it is pervaded with grace
as the ground for Israel’s very existence has little time for excusing
constant and trustless moaning against God and his ways and the flagrant
rebellion that such a spirit often leads to.
Bamidbar (Numbers)
is about the importance of God-appointed leaders. Leaders are to
understand that they represent God and must honor him before the people
(see 20:1-12, 24 and 27:13). Leadership must not be seized or sought out
of jealousy or discontent with the way things are going (see 12:1-15
and 16:1-50 and especially 17:5,10 and "grumbling"). When God appointed
leaders the people were expected to obey them (27:12-22 and 17:5).
Bamidbar (Numbers) is about various forms of legislation that shaped and enabled Israel as a single people to express its faith. Bamidbar (Numbers) concerns itself with Israel proclaiming in act and structure what it believes
and not just how "nice" they are. The book says there is more to being
God’s people than being nice and kind and upright. God’s people is to be
a community of witness to whom the Lord is, to what he has done, is
doing and will do. By living in the structured way they did the entire
nation proclaimed a single faith. Ordinances and ritual have power that mustn’t be belittled or dismissed.
There must be devoted hearts and individual commitment but the people
of God must not be splintered into thousands of individual free-standing
units. Ordinances and structures help to see that that doesn’t occur
and that God’s people offer a united witness to the world.
We
don't have to pretend that everything in the book of Numbers makes
exciting reading to recognize that there's more in there than easily
bored people are able to see. Maybe the problem isn't with the book.
Didn't one man look at a masterpiece and say, "I don't see anything in
that"? And didn't someone beside him say, "And don't you wish you
could?"