Danny & the preacher (2)
Sean died a few months after the surgery. The cancer
raged through him with lightning speed. The poor, worn out child made
his departure from the world and the parents were beyond consolation. It
must have been three weeks later that the preacher got a call from
Sean’s daddy who just couldn’t bear to think that the last word had been
said when they laid Sean in the ground. But he couldn’t pretend to
believe what he felt he had no grounds for. The opening line was simple.
I’m Sean’s dad, Do you remember me?
"I do," the man said. "Have been wondering how you were getting on."
"I told you at the hospital that I thought Sean’s life was
pointless." There was a catch in his voice. "But I didn’t feel that. I
only meant...I was only saying since there’s no God then this whole
existence was unplanned. Sean meant everything to us and whether anyone
planned him to be here or not he made our lives richer, and our hearts
are broken. I needed you to know that."
"I knew it," said the man. "Nobody with a grain of sense would have
thought you were dismissing Sean. In any case, those were awful days and
maybe not the best time for a discussion of world-views. I say ‘maybe’
because I’m not sure. In any case, here you are and I want to tell you
I’m genuinely saddened by your loss."
The grieving father said, "You said things I didn’t understand,
things I wasn’t in the mood to wrestle with. But I knew you were saying
that our son’s life and death had some profound meaning. It didn’t
matter to me at the time for all I could think of was that he was going
to die. I think I’m grasping at straws simply because I want to believe
that there’s more to his life than a few happy years and a hard death.
I’d like you to tell me what you meant, unless you were only saying
stuff in an attempt to make us feel a bit better."
They arranged to meet, met, sat a while, walked a while and then sat some more. And all the while they talked.
"I wanted to talk now," said Danny, "because I think I’m more open now to being persuaded. I want
to believe. As the months go by and the pain eases and I become
adjusted to his being gone I’ll not feel the need as I feel it now. I
know I’m vulnerable but I think I’ll recognise religious nonsense when I
hear it."
"All that makes sense," the man said. "And I think you’re right in
talking further about this while you feel this way. I hear a lot of talk
about ‘rational argument’ and the fact that we shouldn’t discuss things
while we’re emotional. Cool logic and rationality’s critically
important but there are areas of life that don’t fit neatly into the
realm of logic and rationality. Computers are marvellous things but they
have their limitations; people are more than breathing computers. To
battle injustice in society with nothing but rationality isn’t possible
and there are things that human icicles can’t see. There are truths we
can’t grasp until we experience love or driving passion. Not
everything’s settled by the law of the excluded middle."
"You said something about Sean and kids like him suffering for the
world. If you meant that a child’s suffering might move some people to
be more compassionate, I can see that. But it’s one of those empty pious
remarks. It can equally make people bitter. Is that what you meant?"
"No, that’s not what I meant; and you’re right, a child’s suffering
can work either way. We see that nearly every day, don’t we? Look, I
told you that what I believe has nothing to support it if we can’t give
Jesus Christ and the Hebrew-Christian scriptures our trust."
"Do you mean I have to believe everything I read in the Bible before I
can see Sean in a right way? If that’s it, we’re wasting our time
here."
"I don’t believe that, but the Bible does have a grand drift that
comes to a head in Jesus Christ. I’m one of those that believe God is
the ultimate author of the Bible. I’m not interested here in theories of
inspiration or exactly how he got that done, but I believe that in the
final analysis we have the Bible we have because God wanted it that way.
It’s like an historical drama that’s moving toward a finale of cosmic
renewal, where all wrongs are righted and there’s a happy ending. Yes, I
know, I know—. But it isn’t always wrong to want something to be true.
The atheist H.J Blackham said the most powerful argument against atheism
is that it’s too bad to be true."
"So what is it you say we have to do, believe it before we can believe it?"
"I’m saying that to the degree that you’re able, give the Story a
fair hearing. Do what you would do in so many other areas when someone
is proposing something you don’t go along with—give it a good hearing.
Nothing’s gained if the proposal is attacked at every point before it is
heard in its entirety."
"What if it’s stupid at every point? Should we pretend to be listening?"
"No, I think life’s too short to throw that much time away; but I’d
hope that you wouldn’t think that the Christian faith is that far out of
whack. I know you know people that are devoted Christians, people
intellectually capable, maybe even brilliant, and practical too, so
there must be something credible in it.
"Well, can we cut to the chase? I’ll just have to do my best and if I
feel I’ve heard enough we’ll leave it at that. That okay with you?"
"Sure. But I need you to understand that ‘cutting to the chase’
doesn’t mean there’s a ten-minute presentation coming up. And you need
to understand that to give it a fair hearing means you have to judge the
Story within its own parameters. The blacksmith that proved iron ships
couldn’t float by throwing a horseshoe into a barrel of water helped
nobody."
"The biblical Story says that God created us out of love and joy.
That he created us in his own image—that is, he created us to live in
creative, joyful and holy reflection of himself. So we didn’t arrive
here by chance and our lives weren’t meant to be misery, a ceaseless
brawl with disease and death."
Sean’s dad stirred but said nothing.
"But the human family—our parents at that point—rebelled and ‘sin’
entered. From there it spread throughout the human family, polluting
everyone it touched. Sin enters people and it’s there it must be dealt
with. God moved to deal with sin and brought ‘curse’ on his creation; a
curse that affected both the earth and the life on it. Death was part of
that curse."
"Spiteful, isn’t he!"
"I can see how you could view it that way, but that’s not the only
option. The biblical claim is that the move was to redeem humanity from
sin and mend the relationship—life was the end aim."
"The final goal is life, so he brings death? Even to innocent
children? If you’re saying that God put the guilty to death I’d even
have reservations about that, but when you talk about his punishing
kids...I think that’s obscene."
"God doesn’t punish the innocent! But yes, the Bible says that
he subjects even children and good people to pain and loss. We choke on
that too. But, again, motive matters supremely, doesn’t it? You watched
surgeons do things to Sean that were appalling. No, you didn’t watch
it; you asked for it and even paid to have it done. You couldn’t have done that unless you loved the boy supremely. This was no easy decision for you and Denise and it was nothing but your love and compassion for the child that drove you to say yes. The aim was life! If you can even begin to credit a God with love for the human family—the kind of love you and Denise felt and feel for Sean—you are on your way to the possibility of seeing Sean’s life and suffering in a different light.
"Well, I can see some point to that. But we did that only because
Sean was desperately ill. We wouldn’t have done it to him if he’d been
well. If you’re saying that God brought this on him that means God
thought he was ill—I suppose you’d say with sin."
"I’m making no suggestion that your child was a sinner or God was
punishing him. No, the point I want to make about paramedics and
surgeons is that their motive is not spite, and it’s not to inflict
pain. It’s to save life! Motive makes a difference to actions. And the more desperate the situation the more radical our loving response will be.
To bring life to your child you subjected him to terrible trauma. If
you’re able, give God the credit for wanting to bring life to a whole
human family by dealing with the thing that devours it—sin. I’m saying
that your motive relative to Sean is God’s motive relative to his entire
human family."
"But how does Sean fit into this? I can make sense of my putting him to this because he was desperately ill, but are you saying God thought he was desperately ill and gave him bone cancer?"
"No, Sean was a member of a family that’s desperately ill and he suffered from the curse that God brought on the family to bring it back to life."
"But why should an innocent child be punished for the crimes of the family? That stinks!"
"Listen, and listen to this carefully, God doesn’t punish the innocent! Punishment is only for the guilty. Sean’s suffering was not punishment
for wrong that he did! He’s a sweet child that suffered on behalf of a
guilty human family. The biblical Story says that Jesus became a boy
like your boy and that he suffered on behalf of the human family. Jesus
and Sean have some things in common. God wouldn’t exempt his unique Son
who was part of the human family—a family under God’s redeeming
judgement—and he wouldn’t exempt Sean. I’m not suggesting that Sean and
Jesus are altogether alike—Christ alone is the world’s Redeemer! The way
in which God has moved to redeem the world comes to its highest point
in Jesus Christ—a place no other can share. But the principle of
vicarious suffering is at the heart of that process and it didn’t begin
with Jesus on the cross and it didn’t end there."
"But why should Sean suffer for anyone? Why him? How does his pain
affect anything? Why should God pick on him? His suffering is so
senseless!"
"It would be if atheism is true! It would all come down to ‘bad
luck’. All life and death would turn out to be sheer chance. At some
point you came to believe that, and it brings you no comfort. There’s a
choice to make. Believe that death is another pointless inevitability in
a pointless universe or believe that it’s the work of God that’s a part
of the process that brings eternal life to humanity. God’s Son suffered
and died as your son did. Christ rose from the dead and lives immortal
now. His claim is that death is not the final word about Sean."
"So, I’m to find comfort in the fact that Sean will live again?"
"Yes! That’s part of it. It’s the claim of the living Christ over
against the theory that the only future is the vast death of the
universe, eternal darkness and unimaginable cold. All heat and light
exhausted, all life extinguished and no possibility of it ever
returning."
"If that’s the truth, it’s the truth and there’s nothing we can do about it."
"Of course! I’m just pointing out that facing that kind of future
should make anyone want something better. I’m saying that Christ says we
don’t have to believe that about Sean or anyone else. He isn’t gone
forever and the life he lived here was not without significance.
The Christ’s life, suffering and death give meaning to Sean’s. In the
light of Jesus Christ we can’t look at suffering and death and simply
damn it as pointless. In the light of Jesus Christ we can’t look at
Sean’s suffering and death and reduce it to nothing more than something
to weep about. The glory of God was seen here! Mary mourned at the cross
of her Son as you and Denise mourn at the death of yours—that makes
perfect sense. But there’s more there than something to mourn! I don’t want
to suppress your grief. I say that innocent children suffer because
humanity is morally insane and God is using them to bring it back to
sanity and life.
"Using them sounds like they expendable—paper plates and plastic forks."
"No! No! God loves Sean even more than you do. Your son will live
again. The whole story about your son will be told, along with the
stories of millions of other innocents that have borne the burden of
humanity’s guilt. Atheism might offer the view that we’re organisms that
just happened to grow like fungus on the face of a tiny planet in the
middle of nowhere. Christ knows Sean personally and they have shared
some things in common."
They agreed to meet again.