2/1/14

From Jim McGuiggan... 1 Peter 3.19, spirits in prison

1 Peter 3.19, spirits in prison

Percy asked who the "spirits in prison" are that are mentioned in 1 Peter 3:19. Somewhere around 414 AD Augustine wrote his fellow-bishop Evodius about this section of scripture. Over and over again he confessed its difficulty and several times he urged his friend to ask other wise people to comment on it. I think Peter had his nerve when he said Paul wrote some things difficult to understand (2 Peter 3:16). In any case, Augustine thought that "the spirits in prison" were men who were in the bonds of moral darkness and ignorance.

I tend to the view that they are the spirits of those to whom Noah preached. They are spirits in prison while Peter writes but they were very much alive when Noah preached to them. In 4:6 Peter speaks of the gospel being preached "to them that are dead." I don’t think he meant that the gospel was preached to men who had already died. They were dead while Peter wrote but when the gospel was preached to them they were living.

In chapter 3 Peter returns to something he has already mentioned in 2:18-24. He insists there that if suffering is to come, the Christian servants should make sure it is suffering they didn’t earn. It is better to suffer for righteousness sake than to suffer (be punished) for evil-doing. In 3:13-22) he returns to that (especially verse 17).

There are three suffering situations in that section. There is the (possible) suffering of the Christians (3:14), the suffering of Christ (3:18) and the suffering of the antediluvian rebels (3:20).
The rebels in Noah’s day suffered at the hand of God for doing evil and the outcome was not blessing but imprisonment after this earthly phase of living. Jesus Christ suffered in this earthly phase of living but he did it for good because he did it for God and the result was resurrection and enthronement (3:21-22). The Christians are to take their choice. If they choose good they will (possibly) suffer (3:14) but the end result is salvation beyond death (proclaimed in their baptism) because they are raised with Christ (3:21). Their baptism is a commitment to obedience (3:21) and the antediluvian baptism is the outcome of a commitment to disobedience. The antediluvian baptism resulted in death and imprisonment and the Christian baptism results in life, renewed life to God through the resurrection and glorification of Christ.

If they should suffer even worse trials than they’re suffering up to now (1:7) and are martyred at least they won’t have died at the hand of God as Noah’s peers did. Nor will they die to God. Some saints who may already have been martyred (compare 4:6) suffered the fate of Jesus Christ who was put to death in the flesh (3:18, 4:1). But the gospel had been preached to them (compare 1:12,25) that though they would suffer as men in the flesh they would live unto God in spirit (4:6).

Yes, but if the spirits in prison are really the pre-flood peers of Noah how is it that Jesus preached to them (3:19)? I suppose he could have done it between his death and resurrection. What he would have preached, why to that specific group rather than everyone or some other group would remain a complete mystery. And the purpose for which he preached to them would be another mystery. To give them a "second chance"? Why them and not all? Why them when Genesis 6 describes them as so wicked that God "repented" of having made man?

Following many others my guess is that he preached through Noah who, Peter tells us, was a preacher of righteousness (2 Peter 2:6). We’re told that the Spirit of Christ spoke through the prophets (1 Peter 1:11) so his Holy Spirit surely spoke through Noah. So maybe we should capitalize "spirit" in 3:19 and make it the Holy Spirit, plain and simple.

But that’s probably too simple. The "flesh" very often in scripture (and especially in Paul) speaks from a moral perspective and suggests something sinister—the "flesh" is all that is opposed to God (Romans 8:5-8 is a single illustration). But it doesn’t always suggest that. It can suggest human vulnerability and weakness. Paul speaks of Christ being put to death in weakness and made alive in power (2 Corinthians 13:4) and Peter speaks of him being put to death in "flesh" (there’s no definite article) and made alive in "spirit". Flesh and spirit in Peter probably speak of two modes of existence. "In (the) flesh" was Christ in his vulnerability and in spirit is his existing in divine power, beyond vulnerability (that would be where 3:22 comes in). Perhaps Peter (who knows about Christ’s pre-existence, 1 Peter 1:20) is saying that by virtue of his divinity Christ was able and did indeed preach through Noah to those who now while Peter writes are spirits in prison.

©2004 Jim McGuiggan. All materials are free to be copied and used as long as money is not being made.

Many thanks to brother Ed Healy, for allowing me to post from his website, theabidingword.com.