http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=3484
Evolutionary Theory Changes Its Tune...Again
| by | Eric Lyons, M.Min. |
The song has been playing like a broken record for decades: “Evolution is true. Evolution is a fact. Evolution is true. Evolution is a fact....” As long as this mantra is
repeated
by enough intellectuals, it seems many will become and/or remain
enamored with evolutionary theory—even when the underlying evidence is
shown continually to be inadequate and at odds with reality. Many
evolutionary-laden science textbooks declare that natural selection
(e.g., English peppered moths), mutations, embryology, homology, the
fossil record (e.g., the horse “family tree”), etc. all prove the
General Theory of Evolution. In actuality, none of
these proves what evolutionists claim. Creationists recognize the fossil
record, similarities among living things, natural selection, and
mutations, but we have observed nothing that proves
humans descended from amphibious creatures that crawled out of the water
hundreds of millions of years ago. The fact is, evolutionists’ “proofs”
are simply assertions. Their theory is merely a twisted interpretation of the physical world. What’s more, their “story” changes from one year to the next—and sometimes one day to the next.Consider evolutionists’ assertions regarding the origin of birds. A 1989 Earth Science high school textbook declared: “The fossil record clearly shows that the immediate ancestor of this bird [Archaeopteryx—EL] was
a
dinosaur” (Namowitz and Spaulding, p. 565, emp. added). In 1994,
Prentice Hall published a widely used middle school textbook titled Evolution: Change Over Time.
Adjacent to a chart showing how long ago birds supposedly evolved from
dinosaurs, the editors placed these words: “[B]iologists think that
birds are actually modern-day dinosaurs. Current theory indicates that
birds evolved from the most famous of the dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex”
(p. 67). Only last year, evolutionary scientists in China confidently
affirmed that “birds evolved from dinosaurs” (“Feathered Fossils...,”
2009), and just last month we reported how evolutionary scientists
writing in Nature magazine allegedly “confirmed” (yet once again) that birds evolved from dinosaurs (Butt, 2010).Shortly after this most recent dinosaur-to-bird article was published in Nature this past January (Zhang, et al., 2010), an article by Oregon State zoologist John Ruben appeared in the pro-evolutionary journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. What’s different about this story? For starters, Ruben acknowledged in the first line of the article that “new fossils, and reinterpretations of well-known fossils, sharply at odds with conventional wisdom never seem to cease popping up” (2010). Furthermore, he admitted to the “vagaries of the fossil record,” declaring what creationists have been affirming for years: “current notions of near resolution of many of the most basic questions about long-extinct forms should probably be regarded with caution” (2010, emp. added). “Even major aspects of paleobiology of intensely studied, recently extinct taxa (<10 added="" emp.="" p="" remain="" uben="" unresolved="" yrs.=""> One “major” unresolved aspect of paleobiology that Ruben addressed was the origin of birds.
Although
“many scientific and lay communities,” including countless public
school textbook editors, have been championing for decades that birds
are “living dinosaurs,” Ruben urged readers to put the brake on this
bandwagon. First of all, “very recent data suggest that many clearly
cursorial theropods [ground dwelling dinosaurs—EL]
previously thought to have been feathered may not have been” (Ruben;
cf. Lingham-Soliar, et al., 2007, 274:1823-1829; see also Butt, 2010).
What’s more, “the group that birds are assumed to have
been derived from, may not even have been dinosaurs” (Ruben, emp.
added)! Even though for many years, innumerable impressionable minds
have been taught the “factuality” of dinosaur-to-bird evolution,
evolutionary zoologist John Ruben says this was only an assumption.
Scientists have never proven that dinosaurs evolved into birds. In
fact, based upon recent model glide tests done by several scientists
around the country (see Alexander, et al., 2010), a growing number of
evolutionists appear to be “broadly at odds with one another” (Ruben).Evolutionary theories regarding bird-origins are contradictory, plain and simple. Some contend, “The evidence shows that birds evolved from dinosaurs,” yet others are drawing “totally different” conclusions (“Challenge to Dino-Bird...,” 2010)—based upon the same evidence. Although dinosaur-to-bird theorists have “insisted...that the debate is all over and done with,” Ruben has stated that “this issue isn’t resolved at all. There are just too many inconsistencies with the idea that birds had dinosaur ancestors” (Viegas, 2010). Instead, Ruben believes that “the evidence is finally showing that these [raptors] which are usually considered dinosaurs were actually descended from birds, not the other way around” (as quoted in “Challenge to Dino-Bird...,” 2010, emp. added, bracketed item in orig.).
Ruben is correct about one thing: the often-parroted claim that dinosaurs evolved into birds is merely an assumption (and a wrong one at that!). Yet, Ruben and others are sadly mistaken that birds evolved into dinosaurs. Both of these conclusions are simply unjustified, unproven interpretations of the fossil record. The fossil record in no way proves evolution. Dinosaurs never evolved into birds and birds never evolved into dinosaurs. God created these animals on days five and six of Creation...and no fossil has ever contradicted this fact.
REFERENCES
Butt, Kyle (2010), “Were Dinosaur ‘Feathers’ Colored?” Resources, [On-line], URL: http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/240350.
“Challenge to Dino-Bird Evolution Theory Not Dead Yet” (2010), [On-line], URL: http://www.world-science.net/othernews/100210_bird.htm.
Evolution: Change Over Time (1994), (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
“Feathered Fossils Prove Birds Evolved from Dinosaurs, Say Chinese Scientists” (2009), Mail Online, September 25, [On-line], URL: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1215998/Feathered-fossils-prove-birds-evolved-dinosaurs-say-Chinese-scientists.html.
Lingham-Soliar, Theagarten., Alan Feduccia, and Xiaolin Wang (2007), “A New Chinese Specimen Indicates that ‘ProtoFeathers’ in the Early Cretaceous Theropod Dinosaur Sinosauropteryx are Degraded Collagen Fibers,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, August 7, 274:1823-1829.
Namowitz, Samuel and Nancy Spaulding (1989), Earth Science (Lexington, MA: Heath).
Ruben, John (2010), “Paleobiology and the Origins of Avian Flight,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(7):2733-2734, February 9, [On-line], URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/7/2733.extract?sid=aae35bc0-203d-4460-b1c2-cadd08fd1665.
Viegas, Jennifer (2010), “Some ‘Dinosaurs’ Evolved from Birds?” DiscoveryNews, February 17, [On-line], URL: http://news.discovery.com/dinosaurs/some-dinosaurs-evolved-from-birds.html.
Zhang, Fucheng, Stuart Kearns, Patrick Orr, et al. (2010), “Fossilized Melanosomes and the Color of Cretaceous Dinosaurs and Birds,” Nature, January 27, [On-line], URL: etahttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature08740.html.